NobleSavage
Veteran Member
No, but they fail anatomy if they use the term "dick tube."
I do know of the term urethra, but dick tube is so much more fun to type.
No, but they fail anatomy if they use the term "dick tube."
So not what I had in mind ...There is a summer Proctology Lab course.
My delayed reaction to this is if they are going to be preforming the test it might be a good idea for them to be required to experience it. Doctors and nurses should know what it's like to be on the other side.
Usually the test is conducted in a private room with only the technician and perhaps an appropriate sex nurse present. No walking across rooms or public self stimulation required. There is no training benefit for the public presentation process described.
So not what I had in mind ...There is a summer Proctology Lab course.
So not what I had in mind ...There is a summer Proctology Lab course.
If it can be shown that a student's grade depend upon whether or not she volunteered to be an exam patient, the school will have a real problem, because that is coercion.
There is a summer Proctology Lab course.
So not what I had in mind ...
It's the sort of thing that would be right up your alley.
I don't know since I am not a attorney. But I would think some degree and combination of sexual harassment, sexual molestation, extortion, possibly A&B. Probably other things as well. Depends on what the prosecution strategy would be.
If it can be shown that a student's grade depend upon whether or not she volunteered to be an exam patient, the school will have a real problem, because that is coercion.
I don't think so if it was disclosed beforehand that this would be part of the grade.
Assuming no one is being forced against their will to take the class or attend the school.
Of course it's also possible that the teachers went well beyond what the students could have reasonably expected when they agreed to take the class and consented to being graded in part on submitting to the exams.
Maybe I'm missing something, but haven't medical students been doing tests on each other since the beginning? My ex BIL (an ER doctor) told me they usually performed diagnostic tests on each other, including some of the more embarrassing ones. I remember thinking at the time that I'm glad I never was interested in medicine as a career.
My delayed reaction to this is if they are going to be preforming the test it might be a good idea for them to be required to experience it. Doctors and nurses should know what it's like to be on the other side.
Usually the test is conducted in a private room with only the technician and perhaps an appropriate sex nurse present. No walking across rooms or public self stimulation required. There is no training benefit for the public presentation process described.
Why can't that be simulated in a test? One required volunteer, one student being tested, one proctor, and a private room. Isn't requiring an "appropriate sex nurse" sexist? What if the nurse is trans-hybrid-gender-confused?
I don't think so if it was disclosed beforehand that this would be part of the grade.
Assuming no one is being forced against their will to take the class or attend the school.
Of course it's also possible that the teachers went well beyond what the students could have reasonably expected when they agreed to take the class and consented to being graded in part on submitting to the exams.
No.
The grade awarded in a course reflects a students performance and mastery of the material. It is not compensation for being a classroom fixture. Disclosing that students are required to submit to a medical procedure before class starts does not change the nature of the exchange. If the class is a required credit for graduation, there is no choice.
As for no one being forced to attend the school, I doubt the application form includes a warning that students will be expected to submit to pelvic exams by fellow students. "Informed consent" requires information.
Second this. To the extent practical I think all of the hands-on people should be required to be on the other end of invasive tests so they understand what their patients are going through. Without that I've seen too much disregard for patient's comfort. So few doctors care about things like cold instruments.
Second this. To the extent practical I think all of the hands-on people should be required to be on the other end of invasive tests so they understand what their patients are going through. Without that I've seen too much disregard for patient's comfort. So few doctors care about things like cold instruments.
I'd have my doubts this is a particularly effective or reliable method to accomplish that goal. It also creates a gender discrepancy in cases such as these.
Second this. To the extent practical I think all of the hands-on people should be required to be on the other end of invasive tests so they understand what their patients are going through. Without that I've seen too much disregard for patient's comfort. So few doctors care about things like cold instruments.
I'd have my doubts this is a particularly effective or reliable method to accomplish that goal. It also creates a gender discrepancy in cases such as these.
I'd have my doubts this is a particularly effective or reliable method to accomplish that goal. It also creates a gender discrepancy in cases such as these.
Uh uh uh!
If you complain about gender discrepancies like this, then you are "persecuting" men. Then we will have to listen to all the conservative/libertarian MRA nuts whine about how much they're being oppressed by "feminazis" and "political correctness."
I'd have my doubts this is a particularly effective or reliable method to accomplish that goal. It also creates a gender discrepancy in cases such as these.
^^^ that.
Was reading Loren's and NS's comments, and wondering how they expect a vaginal ultrasound should be performed on a man.
I figure there are enough invasive/embarrassing tests for both sexes to go around and in the case of med techs or nurses it's going to be the male that is the odd one out.
Second this. To the extent practical I think all of the hands-on people should be required to be on the other end of invasive tests so they understand what their patients are going through. Without that I've seen too much disregard for patient's comfort. So few doctors care about things like cold instruments.
- - - Updated - - -
Thank ewe.
Usually the test is conducted in a private room with only the technician and perhaps an appropriate sex nurse present. No walking across rooms or public self stimulation required. There is no training benefit for the public presentation process described.
Why can't that be simulated in a test? One required volunteer, one student being tested, one proctor, and a private room. Isn't requiring an "appropriate sex nurse" sexist? What if the nurse is trans-hybrid-gender-confused?
Appropriate-sex nurse is actually a matter of protecting the doctor from false charges.
No.
The grade awarded in a course reflects a students performance and mastery of the material. It is not compensation for being a classroom fixture. Disclosing that students are required to submit to a medical procedure before class starts does not change the nature of the exchange. If the class is a required credit for graduation, there is no choice.
As for no one being forced to attend the school, I doubt the application form includes a warning that students will be expected to submit to pelvic exams by fellow students. "Informed consent" requires information.
You are aware this class is training people to give medical exams?
I'd have my doubts this is a particularly effective or reliable method to accomplish that goal. It also creates a gender discrepancy in cases such as these.
Uh uh uh!
If you complain about gender discrepancies like this, then you are "persecuting" men. Then we will have to listen to all the conservative/libertarian MRA nuts whine about how much they're being oppressed by "feminazis" and "political correctness."