• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Suspect behind threats to Jewish sites arrested

I have noticed a trend of Derec calling black male suspects to crimes guilty, but non-Black men are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. I know that others have mentioned this to him in other threads he posts about black males. I wonder what his excuse will be this time.
 
I have noticed a trend of Derec calling black male suspects to crimes guilty, but non-Black men are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
That's just plain wrong but par for the course for your style of argumentation. I have done the "innocent until proven guilty" for black suspects too in the past, when there was a reasonable doubt as to their guilt. For example Jameis Winston where the accuser did not really present any convincing evidence of his guilt.
 
I have done the "innocent until proven guilty" for black suspects too in the past, when there was a reasonable doubt as to their guilt.
Not much of a defense, Derec.
Doesn't the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' apply to all suspects, whether or not there's reasonable doubt in your mind, until they're actually convicted in court?

Besides, he said 'trend,' Derec.
That's not an absolute.
And one or two counter- examples doesn't exactly disprove a charge of 'trend.' Especially if you're so picky about when to apply the concept.
 
I have noticed a trend of Derec calling black male suspects to crimes guilty, but non-Black men are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
That's just plain wrong but par for the course for your style of argumentation. I have done the "innocent until proven guilty" for black suspects too in the past, when there was a reasonable doubt as to their guilt. For example Jameis Winston where the accuser did not really present any convincing evidence of his guilt.

When two of your hobby horses intersect, there are often exceptions. So, for example, if this was a women lie about sex assault hobby horse, you might make an exception to your black males are guilty hobby horse.
 
I have done the "innocent until proven guilty" for black suspects too in the past, when there was a reasonable doubt as to their guilt.
Not much of a defense, Derec.
Doesn't the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' apply to all suspects, whether or not there's reasonable doubt in your mind, until they're actually convicted in court?

Besides, he said 'trend,' Derec.
That's not an absolute.
And one or two counter- examples doesn't exactly disprove a charge of 'trend.' Especially if you're so picky about when to apply the concept.

I think we are all guilty of assuming guilt or innocence of people accused of crimes based on our own interpretations of publicized facts and/or our own biases without waiting for the outcome of a trial to inform our decision... or even after the verdict. For instance, I was, am, and forever will be convinced that George Zimmerman and O.J. Simpson are both guilty of murder no matter what the juries decided.

Yes, some of us will base our opinions on facts as presented by the media, rather than the color of the accused's skin; but I wouldn't come down too hard on Derec's assumptions of guilt.

My primary objection to the way Derec has presented this is the misleading thread title: Suspect behind threats to Jewish sites arrested.

Either through ignorance or artifice, he made it seem as if this person is suspected of being responsible for all of the threats and attacks all over the country in spite of the fact that authorities were immediately calling it a "copy-cat" limited to the New York area.

And yes, he proceeds as if he already has every possible fact about the accused (even though he declines to share his sources for these claims)

Meantime, he fully admits to be playing a game of "gotcha"
 
I have noticed a trend of Derec calling black male suspects to crimes guilty, but non-Black men are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
That's just plain wrong but par for the course for your style of argumentation. I have done the "innocent until proven guilty" for black suspects too in the past, when there was a reasonable doubt as to their guilt.
Yeah, but your standard for reasonable doubt appears to be much lower for white suspects than for black suspects.
 
I think we are all guilty of
Not until convicted! (:D)
assuming guilt or innocence of people accused of crimes based on our own interpretations of publicized facts and/or our own biases without waiting for the outcome of a trial to inform our decision...
Yes, of course.
But the key is, some of us will tend jump to such conclusions.
Some of us will tend to caution other posters that 'innocent until proven guilty' is the watchword in these sort of publicized cases.
And some will tend to remind others of 'IUPG' for certain cases: White defendant, female accuser, cop...
 
That's not science.
The existence of hermaphrodites as well as male and female is science.
And sexual identity is a psychological phenomena, not a matter of genitalia.
Thanks for the evidence that the right-wing is anti-science.

There are those on the Left who will deny that gender is anything but a social construct. Those people as at least as insane in the membrane as, say, those who deny climate change.

I don't think you understand the difference between gender and gender identity.

Maybe not a science denier, just ignorant.
 
Why would you start a thread about someone who thinks like you do? Obviously, he is not on the same side of extremism as you are, but his world view is made of all the same stuff as yours. His mentality is just as ridden with ignorance, absolutism, fanaticism, cultural myopia, fear of change, fear of others, willingness to punish outgroups, etc., as any right wing authoritarian follower. His zealotry is just aimed at other fascists.
 
Why would you start a thread about someone who thinks like you do? Obviously, he is not on the same side of extremism as you are, but his world view is made of all the same stuff as yours. His mentality is just as ridden with ignorance, absolutism, fanaticism, cultural myopia, fear of change, fear of others, willingness to punish outgroups, etc., as any right wing authoritarian follower. His zealotry is just aimed at other fascists.

You are projecting, as usual.
 
Why would you start a thread about someone who thinks like you do? Obviously, he is not on the same side of extremism as you are, but his world view is made of all the same stuff as yours. His mentality is just as ridden with ignorance, absolutism, fanaticism, cultural myopia, fear of change, fear of others, willingness to punish outgroups, etc., as any right wing authoritarian follower. His zealotry is just aimed at other fascists.

You are projecting, as usual.

Yeah, I'm a total boot licker and hater of vulnerable people. I always take the side of power and totally get off on attacking the powerless. I think all the outgroups identified by whatever authority I'm sucking up to at the moment should be severely punished, and I vote for people who promise to eradicate everyone I've been conditioned to hate. I never support efforts to help anyone outside my ideological in-group.

You are delusional, as usual. Derec's World! Derec's World! Party time! Excellent!
 
You are projecting, as usual.

Yeah, I'm a total boot licker and hater of vulnerable people. I always take the side of power and totally get off on attacking the powerless. I think all the outgroups identified by whatever authority I'm sucking up to at the moment should be severely punished, and I vote for people who promise to eradicate everyone I've been conditioned to hate. I never support efforts to help anyone outside my ideological in-group.

You are delusional, as usual. Derec's World! Derec's World! Party time! Excellent!

Yabut you have NO answer to the devastating argument advanced by the bigot: "I know you are, but what am I!"
 
Yeah, I'm a total boot licker and hater of vulnerable people. I always take the side of power and totally get off on attacking the powerless. I think all the outgroups identified by whatever authority I'm sucking up to at the moment should be severely punished, and I vote for people who promise to eradicate everyone I've been conditioned to hate. I never support efforts to help anyone outside my ideological in-group.

You are delusional, as usual. Derec's World! Derec's World! Party time! Excellent!

Yabut you have NO answer to the devastating argument advanced by the bigot: "I know you are, but what am I!"
OMG I dread that one. *shivers*
 
You are projecting, as usual.

Yeah, I'm a total boot licker and hater of vulnerable people. I always take the side of power and totally get off on attacking the powerless. I think all the outgroups identified by whatever authority I'm sucking up to at the moment should be severely punished, and I vote for people who promise to eradicate everyone I've been conditioned to hate. I never support efforts to help anyone outside my ideological in-group.

You are delusional, as usual. Derec's World! Derec's World! Party time! Excellent!

Derec you need to be like this:

lifeline010.jpg
 
Yeah, I'm a total boot licker and hater of vulnerable people. I always take the side of power and totally get off on attacking the powerless. I think all the outgroups identified by whatever authority I'm sucking up to at the moment should be severely punished, and I vote for people who promise to eradicate everyone I've been conditioned to hate. I never support efforts to help anyone outside my ideological in-group.

You are delusional, as usual. Derec's World! Derec's World! Party time! Excellent!

Derec you need to be like this:

View attachment 10155

I don't follow what you're implying. Elaborate.
 
I have noticed a trend of Derec calling black male suspects to crimes guilty, but non-Black men are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
That's just plain wrong but par for the course for your style of argumentation. I have done the "innocent until proven guilty" for black suspects too in the past, when there was a reasonable doubt as to their guilt. For example Jameis Winston where the accuser did not really present any convincing evidence of his guilt.

Well since Jameis Winston was accused of sexual assault we just assume that you would defend him.
 
That's just plain wrong but par for the course for your style of argumentation. I have done the "innocent until proven guilty" for black suspects too in the past, when there was a reasonable doubt as to their guilt. For example Jameis Winston where the accuser did not really present any convincing evidence of his guilt.

Well since Jameis Winston was accused of sexual assault we just assume that you would defend him.

It's just in his universe women are lower than black men.

The worst thing is to be a cuck. To be lower than some woman on the power scale.
 
Yeah, I'm a total boot licker and hater of vulnerable people. I always take the side of power and totally get off on attacking the powerless. I think all the outgroups identified by whatever authority I'm sucking up to at the moment should be severely punished, and I vote for people who promise to eradicate everyone I've been conditioned to hate. I never support efforts to help anyone outside my ideological in-group.

You are delusional, as usual. Derec's World! Derec's World! Party time! Excellent!

Derec you need to be like this:

View attachment 10155

He probably does, but what does this have to do with my post? Do you have anything of higher level of nuance than a third grader could manage?
 
That's just plain wrong but par for the course for your style of argumentation. I have done the "innocent until proven guilty" for black suspects too in the past, when there was a reasonable doubt as to their guilt. For example Jameis Winston where the accuser did not really present any convincing evidence of his guilt.

Well since Jameis Winston was accused of sexual assault we just assume that you would defend him.
Yes poor accused Jameis Winston.......who just told a group of elementary school children that girls need to sit down and be SILENT. Sorry for the side rant, but I fucking hate that mother fucker!
 
Back
Top Bottom