Cycad
Member
To justify the sense of being singled out for the destruction of statues, we would need fairly analogous statues of non whites would did similar things (cross racial/ethnic conquest or subjugation) under demand to be removed from public quasi governmental space.
Perhaps statues of Emperor Meiji in Hokkaido or Okinawa (if they even exist) would be analogous. But an Ainu or native Okinawan group asking to remove an Emperor Meiji statue in Tokyo instead would be crazy.
Europeans had the jump on expansion so they are the lion's share of these statues.
Belgium has still lots of statues of King Leopold II. He was personally, as private person, responsible for a genocide of a few million people. Estimates vary widely upto 10 million. His family fortune, based on ruthless exploitation in Congo, is still enjoyed by the Belgian Kings.
His grandson even had the chutzpah to praise king leopolds genocide during the Independence opening ceremony of the congolese parliament. (Where Lumamba answered him with the truth and was murdered for it)
I like the statues and monuments of Leo II and would be sad to see them go. I believe a clear memo should be added to the monuments, explaining exactly who the person is and what he did. I like the action of a group of anarchists who cut of Leopolds statues hand to remind people about the less glorious past of this person.
Goes for statues of Lenin and Saddam but also of Stalin (if they exist) I believe there are statues of Genghis Khan, Godefroid of Bouillon. Destroying them all is an attempt to erase a page of our history. Not to explain it.