The retreat of reason

[LordKiran]

Actually I'm pretty sure this thread is about the clothes.

That's just a symptom of the greater disease that is the regressive left's eternal quest for "equality" that ultimately tears down anyone who isn't part of what they define to be "oppressed" minority groups.

What I really want liberals to explain is why they keep trying to involve children in their schemes related to gender and sex. Hmmm, strange!

Well nobody here is "The left" so if that's who your grievance is with, I suggest you find this person and let them have it!

 

[bilby]

Actually I'm pretty sure this thread is about the clothes.

That's just a symptom of the greater disease that is the regressive left's eternal quest for "equality" that ultimately tears down anyone who isn't part of what they define to be "oppressed" minority groups.

What I really want liberals to explain is why they keep trying to involve children in their schemes related to gender and sex. Hmmm, strange!

You appear to be living in backwards world, where the people who are sexualising pre-pubescent children are somehow the protectors, and the people who consider gender irrelevant before puberty are 'involve[d] in schemes related to gender and sex'.

Infants are indestingishable by gender, unless you inspect their genitals, or go out of your way to signal gender through clothing choices. Why any normal and healthy person would want to do either is beyond me; but certainly doing neither is the diametric opposite of 'schemes related to gender and sex'.

Your warped interest in the sex and gender of infants is a worry. The degree of passion you bring to discussion of it, doubly so.

Show

See - Stupid innuendo in lieu of reason is something both sides can do. Now perhaps we can stop trying to sneakily imply that anyone who disagrees with us must be a paedophile (although that is a refreshing change from being Hitler), and have a reasoned and sensible discussion about how changing fashions are going to destroy society?

 

[spikepipsqueak]

First liberals deny race, now they deny gender. What else will be sacraficed at the altar of "equality"?

You're objecting because a store has rearranged their aisles so that people can walk in, buy the clothes that they and their children think will suit, and walk out?

In what way is that restricting the choices they had before?

 

[NMN]

Bilby perfectly demonstrates how the regressive left argues: stake out the latest Tumblr-approved position on race or gender or whatever, have that position completely demolished, then claim victory anyways.

 

[beero1000]

Bilby perfectly demonstrates how the regressive left argues: stake out the latest Tumblr-approved position on race or gender or whatever, have that position completely demolished, then claim victory anyways.

The projection in this post is just amazing. Made my day.

 

[TSwizzle]

It's about the fact that liberals are pushing the psuedoscientific idea that sex and gender aren't real.

Not quite accurate in my opinion. They think these things are a choice. Its hilarious.

 

[LordKiran]

It's about the fact that liberals are pushing the psuedoscientific idea that sex and gender aren't real.

Not quite accurate in my opinion. They think these things are a choice. Its hilarious.

I'll remember to make you eat these words when full sex changes such that former men can give birth are feasible.

PS: We're closer than you might think.

 

[laughing dog]

The thread OP and its defenders are perfect illustrations of conservative snowflakes.

 

[ZiprHead]

Actually I'm pretty sure this thread is about the clothes.

That's just a symptom of the greater disease that is the regressive left's eternal quest for "equality" that ultimately tears down anyone who isn't part of what they define to be "oppressed" minority groups.

What I really want liberals to explain is why they keep trying to involve children in their schemes related to gender and sex. Hmmm, strange!

Awwww, did the snowflake get triggered.

 

[Trausti]

 

[Trausti]

Yes, it is always unreasonable and weird for a business to try to fill a niche for consumers.
And, it is especially unreasonable and irrational for a business to also reduce its costs while trying to fill its niche.

A niche for customers who determine that their children have no gender?

Redolent of the fundamentalist Christians who deemed they could make their gay child not gay with therapy. Now it's the Left denying biology. Seems denial of biology is a feature of all fundamentalist sects.

 

[Cheerful Charlie]

First liberals deny race, now they deny gender. What else will be sacraficed at the altar of "equality"?

Cats are people too!

 

[bilby]

Bilby perfectly demonstrates how the regressive left argues: stake out the latest Tumblr-approved position on race or gender or whatever, have that position completely demolished, then claim victory anyways.

I have never used Tumblr in my life, my opinions are entirely my own, nothing you have posted in any way rebuts a single position I have taken (much less demolished one), and I make no claim to victory - others can draw their own conclusions as to whether or not what I said constitutes a victory over your nonsense.

 

[TSwizzle]

Not quite accurate in my opinion. They think these things are a choice. Its hilarious.

I'll remember to make you eat these words when full sex changes such that former men can give birth are feasible.

PS: We're closer than you might think.

A lifestyle choice. Hilarious.

 

[repoman]

I like the old Edo period Japanese clothing for kids that is sort of like a kimono. It can be used for a few years as the kid grows. But the clothing industry would really hate it.

In a low resource environment it is great.

 

[Trausti]

It's about the fact that liberals are pushing the psuedoscientific idea that sex and gender aren't real.

Not quite accurate in my opinion. They think these things are a choice. Its hilarious.

Not just hilarious, but very wrong.

What happens when you raise boys as girls?

Being raised by gay or lesbian parents doesn't affect a child's gender.

Even Rhesus monkeys show gender toy preferences.

With a nod to Richard Feynman, Nature Cannot Be Fooled.

 

[Trausti]

Sex Differences in Children's Drawings.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

First liberals deny race, now they deny gender. What else will be sacraficed at the altar of "equality"?

First one strawman, then another strawman. What strawman will be next?!

 

[Keith&Co.]

First liberals deny race, now they deny gender. What else will be sacraficed at the altar of "equality"?

First one strawman, then anther strawman. What strawman will be next?!

Strawberries, I hope. I like strawberries.

 

[LordKiran]

Sex Differences in Children's Drawings.

Five year old boys don't draw flowers or butterflies 'cuz they're boys and boys only draw TRUCKS BITCH!