Will anything ever be done about? If so, how and when?
Will the US ever have nice things such as universal healthcare?
I am beginning to think the answer to both questions is no, and
and our oligarchy via campaign bribery and other skeezy influences
will have no end other than total collapse or oppression for everyone in the
US who is not at least upper middle class, I just don't see any signs of
change or its prerequisites at all(like large sustained protest).
It wouldn't change as long as there isn't a counterforce to the ideas,
- that the poor deserve to be poor because they are congenitally unfit or because they are lazy or because they are poor parents, etc.
- that the economy as it is currently formed is somehow "natural" and to interfere with it by redistribution is risky.
- that the government is evil and everything that they do just proves their incompetence, we should run government like a business.
- that regulations choke business growth and impede the overall economy.
- that the poor need the incentive of lower incomes and poverty to better themselves while the rich need ever-higher incomes to provide their incentive to work.
- that we should be working toward free trade and the free market because they would be somehow better in a way that never has to be explained.
- that public debt is built up by overly generous and ultimately unsustainable social programs, endowments, that our children will have to pay back.
- that private debt is a personal weakness that doesn't impact the economy because we owe this money to each other, it all cancels out.
- that the for-profit private sector is always the best, most economical way to accomplish anything.
- that unions destroy the freedom to work and should be suppressed and impeded wherever possible.
- that the minimum wage destroys jobs because the lower wages are the more workers will be hired.
- that deflation is good because it increases the value of money.
- that free trade is good because it lowers the prices that all of us pay for goods which boosts the economy.
- that the economy is a zero-sum game, for someone to get ahead someone has to be held back.
- that the financial sector is inherently stable and self-regulating and doesn't require any government regulations to operate.
- that investment drives the modern economy and that to grow the economy we need to increase the money available for investment.
- that lowering taxes on high incomes increases the money available for investment and grows the economy.
- that the main purpose of the economy is to generate profits for owners and shareholders.
- that corporations are people with the rights of people, and are responsible for the decisions made, not the management of the corporation.
- that innovation is the providence of the individual and everything we do to strengthen the collective diminishes the individual and innovation.
- that profits aren't a cost of production when we talk about the price of goods but are a cost of production when we talk about what is needed to sustain the economy.
- that inflation is evil because it devalues money except, of course when the increased prices are in stocks, bonds and real estate, the inflation that we call capital gains.
All of the above are demonstrably wrong. But hardly a day goes by without one of the intelligent posters on these pages repeating one or more of them. These points are often attributed to Econ 101, economics that is so obvious that it doesn't have to be supported by attributing it to anyone or supported by logic because it is what everyone knows. And every one of the points above when put into practice as policy increases the incomes of the modern American oligarchy. In my mind, this is not a coincidence, because the oligarchy controls the public discussion of the economy. The economists realize that the points above are wrong but they are reluctant to rock the boat of the popular discussion because the oligarchy controls the money that pays for the chairs of economics in universities, that pays for economics research and the oligarchy hires the economists graduating from the economics schools.