There is no evidence of Abiogenesis

[steve_bank]

Exactly, seconds,meters, and kilograms are arbitrary.

People are conditioned by decades of scifi to see time as some kind of reality unto itself.If you talk about tine as a metaphysical abstraction other then seconds then you have to unambiguously define it. If not then it becomes a kind of theology. Christians talk about god without defining what god is.

With relative motion there are four parameters. To define a point in space time in seconds and 3 spacial dimensions in meters. Space-Time.

Spacetime - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

n physics, spacetime, also called the space-time continuum, is a mathematical model that fuses the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time into a single four-dimensional continuum. Spacetime diagrams are useful in visualizing and understanding relativistic effects, such as how different observers perceive where and when events occur.

Spacetime is an abritrary mathematical construction based in meters and seconds.

 

[T.G.G. Moogly]

NEWSFLASH: There isn't any evidence for magic spacemen, just stories, unevidenced claims.

 

[Elixir]

Well, according to creationists anyways. Apparently if you post a link to Nature articles regarding early self replicating nucleotides, that’s not evidence. Nor is evidence of protists or any other mechanism that has been biochemically observed.

Furthermore if you show a photo of hominid skulls arranged chronologically, that too is not evidence of common descent. Apparently that’s just variation in humans. As can be seen by comparing aboriginal Australians to Europeans.

I wonder if they would admit this version of evolution?

View attachment 46528

omg PONIES!!!

Yes! And Eohippus was recently reclassified, having previously been thought to fall under the Hyracotherium genus! He looked a little like a capybara.