Things that make you laugh...

[unapologetic]

Don't you have to train a dog to do that?

That's amazing. Looks like it was actually in the film

What an ass.

Shows human contact is a bad influnce on pandas. Pandas used to be passive and shy.

View attachment 48593

Bullshit. Neuter one male and others will take up the slack. = No change. A single male can impregnate all the females.
Spay one female = one less birth.

 

[Angry Floof]

Don't you have to train a dog to do that?

That's amazing. Looks like it was actually in the film

What an ass.

Shows human contact is a bad influnce on pandas. Pandas used to be passive and shy.

View attachment 48593

Bullshit. Neuter one male and others will take up the slack. = No change. A single male can impregnate all the females.
Spay one female = one less birth.

Males can make hundreds of babies per year, females only one. Still controlling the wrong sex.

 

[bilby]

Males can make hundreds of babies per year, females only one. Still controlling the wrong sex.

A male (singular) can make hundreds, and a female (singular) only one.

But as a population, females control the birthrate, because the above implies (as @unapologetic points out), that a very small number of males are needed to impregnate all the females.

Killing or sterilising 99% of males has no certainty of reducing birthrates, as the remaining 1% can potentially replace those males, and impregnate all of the fertile females.

But if 99% of females don't choose to (or are unable to) have offspring, the birthrate plummets, because females are irreplaceable.

It's not the wrong sex being controlled, so much as the wrong sex being in control. Females have the power, if they choose to wield it. Males would do well to remember that.

 

[Angry Floof]

Killing or sterilising 99% of males has no certainty of reducing birthrates, as the remaining 1% can potentially replace those males, and impregnate all of the fertile females.

Good thing no one wants to do that!

 

[bilby]

Killing or sterilising 99% of males has no certainty of reducing birthrates, as the remaining 1% can potentially replace those males, and impregnate all of the fertile females.

Good thing no one wants to do that!

To kill 99% of the males, or to impregnate all of the fertile females? Or both?

For my next trick, I shall require an AR-14 with a high capacity magazine and a bump stock, plus a few million of those dodgy pheromone wipes they sell in vending machines in grotty nightclub toilets. [/INCEL]