Why?
The DEA has a history - quite an interesting history. Why shouldn't there be a museum where people can learn about that history?
One need not support the DEA's actions or policies in order to be interested in their history.
If a DEA museum makes you sick, Repo, you might want to steer well clear of this one: http://metro.co.uk/2016/03/21/there...o-celebrate-the-wonders-of-excrement-5766552/
Why?
The DEA has a history - quite an interesting history. Why shouldn't there be a museum where people can learn about that history?
One need not support the DEA's actions or policies in order to be interested in their history.
It is run by the DEA itself and is full of propaganda. It does not provide a disinterested, unbiased perspective on drugs in society and the drug war.
Why?
The DEA has a history - quite an interesting history. Why shouldn't there be a museum where people can learn about that history?
One need not support the DEA's actions or policies in order to be interested in their history.
It is run by the DEA itself and is full of propaganda. It does not provide a disinterested, unbiased perspective on drugs in society and the drug war.
I think I am going to be sick!
Live and learn. I just googled "penis museum in iceland" and yes, there is a Phallological Museum in Reykjavik.. Somehow I think it should be in Dildo, Newfoundland. Or have a branch facility in Intercourse, PA.
Live and learn. I just googled "penis museum in iceland" and yes, there is a Phallological Museum in Reykjavik.. Somehow I think it should be in Dildo, Newfoundland. Or have a branch facility in Intercourse, PA.
I thought weed was an anti-emetic.I think I am going to be sick!
Why? Did you smoke too much weed?
The war on drugs has been just another justification to set up a group with spies, guns, handcuffs and a lot of privately owned prisons for the offenders...and the shareholders. The DEA is not going to admit it is a failure and a fraud and has already cost us many lives and a lot of treasure too. This is just some more of the tax money going to pay for cops to go after people who will always be there but are not actually criminals. How much did this little operation cost? Do you think it is good to pay taxes that are spent of political propaganda to keep loser cops jobs?