Underseer
Contributor
How Trump's Legal Defense Mimics Christian Apologetics by Godless in Dixie.
1. The Divine Command Theory
Like what King Louis XIV of France once allegedly stated: "I am the state" (L'état, c'est moi.)
2. Compulsive Control of the Terms of Debate: "Looking to the Trump administration, once again it is Giuliani who keeps issuing demands before his client will appear for an interview before Mueller."
3. Diversionary Tactics/Changing the Subject: "You cannot mention Trump’s abuses of power without immediately triggering a knee-jerk deflection to Hillary Clinton, which is a change of subject."
i. Special pleading: "Because he is president, his lawyers argue, he is the ultimate determiner of what is and isn’t “legal,” so it’s not possible for him to break the law. He’s a special case." Like how Xianity is very unlike any other religion.
ii. Ad hominem attacks: everybody but them has big conflicts of interest.
iii. Tu quoque: "You do it too", like Hillary Clinton.
iv. Argument from authority
v. No true Scotsman: Republicans who oppose President Trump are Not True Republicans, and are shut out just like Democrats.
Excellent article, but the scope of the article is wrong.
It's not just Trump's legal defense. Conservolibertarian debating tactics in general follow these patterns, and I doubt that is a coincidence.