I can only read Half-Life's posts when someone else quotes him by the way.
You are wise.
I can only read Half-Life's posts when someone else quotes him by the way.
But one does give up on reading Onion Reality postings...I can only read Half-Life's posts when someone else quotes him by the way.
You are wise.
USA is now just behind Italy in active cases......
USA now ahead of Italy and top of the list for number of active cases. Though I think Italy's figures for today are not yet included.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
laugh tracks on tv shows are jarring to me now. But great bit at any rate.
Nothing's been able to take down Trump yet. This is no different.
Why are you still trolling?Half Life said:This quarantine will work. I guarantee it. April 12 we will be up and running. The cases are going to start declining in the U.S. starting around the next few days. By April 1, we will see a steady downstream and be on our way out.
Obviously the lockdown can not work that quickly for a couple of reasons. Utmost, the virus supposedly remains in the body for 5 weeks. So even if there were no new cases starting today, we'd have a clock set for 5 weeks.
Then the other issues. Firstly, most states aren't in lockdown. Secondly, the cases don't start slowing down for a week or two after a lockdown starts. Of course, even in locations of lockdowns, there has been issues with people still getting together, so the lockdown is a soft lockdown.
So by early April, the cases slow down acceleration in some areas. The peak is after that, then the new cases start decreasing. No new cases would be no closer than four or five weeks, at the most ridiculously optimistic expectations. Merely having fewer new cases would be reckless justification for ending lockdowns.
A shut down taking only five or so weeks was maybe possible end of February or very early March, before over a million Americans contracted the virus (including unconfirmed cases)!
Democratic governors, including Andrew Cuomo, are grappling with a coronavirus-related fear: piss off the president and risk losing his support.
...
Trump would go on to insist he was not blaming Cuomo. But the magnanimity was short-lived. “It’s a two-way street,” Trump said of having the feds help states with a coronavirus response policy. “They have to treat us well, too.”
...
“If you’re good and respectful to [Trump], he will treat you the same—it’s that simple,” said one senior White House official. “The president has always said that he fights back when he needs to, and the situation with [Cuomo] is no different. If you keep that in mind, their sort of seesaw relationship during [coronavirus] doesn’t come as a surprise.”
...
“He’s been trying to kick the blame to the states... and I think this maneuver [to re-open the economy] is the same,” said one Democratic operative who works on gubernatorial campaigns. “It’s him being able to say: ‘Hey, I opened it up, it’s not my decision that your state kept the economy closed. It’s not on me that you lost your job. Blame your governor.’”
So it’s essentially come to this: President Trump is treating each of our 50 states as individual contestants on “The Apprentice” — pitting them against one another for scarce resources, daring them to duke it out — rather than mobilizing a unified national response to a pandemic.
If that’s the case, this is the episode where New York loses. The coronavirus is whipping through the state, especially New York City, at a terrifying rate. We need personnel, ventilators and personal protective equipment, stat.
But Trump’s response has been the same as President Gerald Ford’s in 1975, when our city, faltering on the brink of insolvency, begged Washington for help and was brutally rebuffed, a moment forever enshrined in The Daily News’s headline “FORD TO CITY: DROP DEAD.”
“I would have fixed that,” Mr. Trump replied with certitude, referring to the government’s bungled rescue and recovery efforts, according to a campaign official who was present for the exchange. “I would have come up with a much better response.” How? He did not say. He just asserted it would have been better and advisers did not press him to elaborate.
“When he’s faced a problem, he has sought to somehow cheat or fix the outcome ahead of time so that he could construct a narrative that showed him to be the winner,” said Michael D’Antonio, a Trump biographer. “And when it was all about feuds with other celebrities or contests over ratings or hotel branding, he could do that and no one cared enough to really check. And the bluster and bragging worked.”
“But in this case,” Mr. D’Antonio added, “he tried that in the beginning and you can’t brag or bluster your way out of people dying. And I think more than the suffering, the human suffering, it’s been the inexorable quality of the data that’s forced him to change.”
I wouldn't be surprised if his advisors are trying to get him to sound like Winston Churchill, but if they are, then they are badly failing.“We’ve done a fantastic job from just about every standpoint,” he said Tuesday. “We’ve done a great job,” he said Wednesday. “We’ve done a phenomenal job on this,” he said Thursday.
The only crisis where he showed any empathy is when three of his executives died in a helicopter crash on the way to Atlantic City. He has seldom showed much empathy for anyone else, like the casino employees who lost their jobs when their casinos went bust.When banks came after him for overdue loans, he pushed back, arguing that it was in their interest that his brand not be harmed by calling him out. When contractors demanded to be paid, he found complaints about their work and refused, leading in part to more than 3,500 lawsuits. When his first two marriages fell apart, he took a scorched-earth approach against his wives, leaking to New York’s gossip columnists even if it meant his children watched ugly divorces play out in public.
...
To Mr. Trump, most of his crises were about paper and money, not people. The self-described “king of debt” treated loan repayments almost as if they were optional and made it a mantra never to back down. “I figured it was the bank’s problem, not mine,” he wrote in one of his books. “What the hell did I care? I actually told one bank, ‘I told you, you shouldn’t have loaned me that money.’”
So Mr. Trump, with his recent descriptions of a war to be won over a “foreign enemy,” is seeking a dynamic that he is familiar with, personifying the virus as an opponent to be beaten, framing it as the kind of crisis he knows how to tackle. “He’s trying to make it into a win-lose situation,” she said. “That’s how he sees the world — winners, him, losers everybody else. He’s trying to make the coronavirus into a loser and himself the winner.”
So why did we begin a campaign for PTO? Because we found out that Amazon was promising us Vacation Time and PTO on paper, but denying it to us in practice.
So he supports employer dependency? It figures that there are forms of dependency that right-wingers like.The four GOP lawmakers—Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Ben Sasse of Nebraska, Tim Scott of South Carolina and Rick Scott of Florida—chalked up the conflict to a "drafting error" and contended it would incentivize low-wage earners to seek unemployment rather than continue working because they could potentially receive more money through unemployment benefits than at their current job.
"I have been one of your strongest supporters for upping unemployment insurance," Graham said. "But I never in my wildest dream believed that we would incentivize people to stop working to take on employment."
"It looks like parts of this bill would actually incentivize the severing of the employee-employer relationship," Sasse added.
This quarantine will work. I guarantee it. April 12 we will be up and running. The cases are going to start declining in the U.S. starting around the next few days. By April 1, we will see a steady downstream and be on our way out.
View attachment 26718
He's been on the take so much over his presidency that that is pure virtue signaling.Trump was asked during Sunday's White House coronavirus task force press conference if he would commit that none of the stimulus money would go toward his business. The president then lamented that "nobody cared" or said "thank you very much" that he has forgone the president's annual salary in excess of $400,000.