barbos
Contributor
Better than nothing.He has very little influence now that he’s off Fox News.
Better than nothing.He has very little influence now that he’s off Fox News.
He’ll go the way of Glenn Beck, who we thankfully never hear anything about anymore.
Sure, but in the context of your desire to see him make America anything, it is increasingly unlikely that he’ll be able to do anything.Better than nothing.He has very little influence now that he’s off Fox News.
Still better than nothing.Sure, but in the context of your desire to see him make America anything, it is increasingly unlikely that he’ll be able to do anything.Better than nothing.He has very little influence now that he’s off Fox News.
As much as Fox News would gripe about the “mainstream media” they actually are mainstream media, and Tucker is now on the fringes of American media, which may have some small effects, but those are dwarfed by the influence of the actual mainstream media, like Fox News.
That's a load of crap. Steven Seagal is not much of talker.He’ll go the way of Glenn Beck, who we thankfully never hear anything about anymore.
Respectfully, I disagree. I think there's a significant chance he might go the way of Steven Seagal instead. Putin may have him move to beautiful Moscow and then give him a job virtual debating political opposition in the same way Seagal pretends to take down opponents. Basically, Tucker's face (like he's taking a dump) could end up being analogous to Seagal's wrist-hold takedowns. Repeated over and over to vulnerable Russian (and Republican) audiences...
So what? That won’t sway American culture in any convincing way. You said you hope he can “make America relatively sane again” and I am saying he won’t make America anything because he has negligible influence. But one can always hope I guess.Still better than nothing.Sure, but in the context of your desire to see him make America anything, it is increasingly unlikely that he’ll be able to do anything.Better than nothing.He has very little influence now that he’s off Fox News.
As much as Fox News would gripe about the “mainstream media” they actually are mainstream media, and Tucker is now on the fringes of American media, which may have some small effects, but those are dwarfed by the influence of the actual mainstream media, like Fox News.
He has 12 million subscribers in twitter. Most of them americans.
What does that have to do with american culture?So what? That won’t sway American culture in any convincing way.
Among democrats sure. But among republicans I still think he has some.he won’t make America anything because he has negligible influence.
Trumpsuckers aren't much listeners. They mostly go for straight violence over articulation.That's a load of crap. Steven Seagal is not much of talker.He’ll go the way of Glenn Beck, who we thankfully never hear anything about anymore.
Respectfully, I disagree. I think there's a significant chance he might go the way of Steven Seagal instead. Putin may have him move to beautiful Moscow and then give him a job virtual debating political opposition in the same way Seagal pretends to take down opponents. Basically, Tucker's face (like he's taking a dump) could end up being analogous to Seagal's wrist-hold takedowns. Repeated over and over to vulnerable Russian (and Republican) audiences...
What does that have to do with american culture?So what? That won’t sway American culture in any convincing way.
Sure. “Some” is not zero, I will grant you that. I just think that his “some” is negligible and will have essentially zero impact.Among democrats sure. But among republicans I still think he has some.he won’t make America anything because he has negligible influence.
I was referring to foreign policy of imperialism ang regime changes everywhere.If you aren’t referring to the culture to what are you referring?
So is pretty much everyone in both side MSM.He’s not an elected politician he is a “media entertainer”.
Well, let's agree to disagree.Sure. “Some” is not zero, I will grant you that. I just think that his “some” is negligible and will have essentially zero impact.
Sure. We can both prognosticate, but history will be the final arbiter.I was referring to foreign policy of imperialism ang regime changes everywhere.If you aren’t referring to the culture to what are you referring?
So is pretty much everyone in both side MSM.He’s not an elected politician he is a “media entertainer”.
Well, let's agree to disagree.Sure. “Some” is not zero, I will grant you that. I just think that his “some” is negligible and will have essentially zero impact.
That's a load of crap. Steven Seagal is not much of talker.He’ll go the way of Glenn Beck, who we thankfully never hear anything about anymore.
Respectfully, I disagree. I think there's a significant chance he might go the way of Steven Seagal instead. Putin may have him move to beautiful Moscow and then give him a job virtual debating political opposition in the same way Seagal pretends to take down opponents. Basically, Tucker's face (like he's taking a dump) could end up being analogous to Seagal's wrist-hold takedowns. Repeated over and over to vulnerable Russian (and Republican) audiences...
Your analogy is crap.If I made an analogy that firemen are to fires as policemen are to criminal situations would you also complain "Policemen do not do much with fires?"
Well, a picture is worth a thousand rubles (or so I hear).
Because he once passed a russian on a street.How is Russia his "home base"?
" Zlata" is not a russian name.I hear Tuck went over to locate Zoya and Zlata, the two Russkie whores who pissed all over Trump. This will give him some leverage over Orangey. He can either have the gals tell their stories on his streaming services, or offer them $100G receptionist jobs to keep their Commie whore mouths shut. Or, excuse me, Commie sex worker mouths.