Its my understanding he wasn't Republican until very recently. Only after the Democrats began transforming into exactly what others including Tulsi Gabbord have discovered.
Smart people might not hold press conferences but normal people do it all the time if they think it will serve their interests. Unless you don't think Micheal Moore or all the other celebrities are normal people.
He started out rich.
What - in any sense of the word - is normal about Michael Moore?
5 million results:
www.bloomberg.com
Martha Stewart was prosecuted for perjury, not insider stock trading.
What did she do that is illegal? I'd agree that laws need to be tightened. But it appears to me that she dragged her feet pursuing legislation. But that's not against the law.5 million results:
pelosi stock trading - Google Search
www.google.com
And out of 5 million Ill give you this one here:
Pelosi Ripped by Fellow Democrat for Delaying Stock-Trade Bill
Democratic Representative Abigail Spanberger lashed out at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other party leaders who she accused of dragging their feet on legislation to ban stock trading by lawmakers.
So all 5 million sources could be BS...because anything has to be possible even given such high odds. But such an excessive agreement of the data suggests an extremely high probability for this being true and accurate.
She is a crook, doing exactly what Martha Stewart was procecuted for.
And out of 5 million Ill give you this one here:
Pelosi Ripped by Fellow Democrat for Delaying Stock-Trade Bill
Democratic Representative Abigail Spanberger lashed out at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other party leaders who she accused of dragging their feet on legislation to ban stock trading by lawmakers.
Yeah, search results on Google can be a shit show. And a woke one at that! Do a google image search on "chinese american family" and check out the results. Again with "japanese american family". And "hispanic american family". Now try "white american family". SMH.
Then what the hell would you have me cite if not google? I can not read your mind about what you think is accurate news. But Pelosi and her husband inside trading has been talked about ad nausim by all the outlets..take your pick. Basically she got caught and was forced to pass a law against it and then retracted the law and got started again. There is a whole group of stock traders doing nothing but following their trades because they know they are beating the S&P by a huge amount.
Wow! I typed "Sean Hannity f**ks his daughter" into the Google search engine, substituting an ancient and well-known Anglo-Saxon word (though it "wasn't in a single English language dictionary from 1795 to 1965") for the "f**ks." and got "About 5,250,000 results (0.43 seconds)" That's 5% more than you report for your Pelosi search. Who are your other political heroes? Should I repeat the experiment? (That wasn't cherry-picked: It was the very first search I tried while laughing at your post.)
Your approach to research is ... unique. Free advice: Don't give up your day job; I don't think even any of the right-wing "think" tanks will hire you.
And out of 5 million Ill give you this one here:
Pelosi Ripped by Fellow Democrat for Delaying Stock-Trade Bill
Democratic Representative Abigail Spanberger lashed out at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other party leaders who she accused of dragging their feet on legislation to ban stock trading by lawmakers.
I did click your link, and got:
Is your delicious "proof" of insider trading behind Bloomberg's pay wall? No.
Thanks very much, RVonse. Your response to my request is almost delicious in what it tells us about right-wing "thinking" and right-wing "research."
Then what the hell would you have me cite if not google? I can not read your mind about what you think is accurate news
Wow! I typed "Sean Hannity f**ks his daughter" into the Google search engine, substituting an ancient and well-known Anglo-Saxon word (though it "wasn't in a single English language dictionary from 1795 to 1965") for the "f**ks." and got "About 5,250,000 results (0.43 seconds)" That's 5% more than you report for your Pelosi search. Who are your other political heroes? Should I repeat the experiment? (That wasn't cherry-picked: It was the very first search I tried while laughing at your post.)
Your approach to research is ... unique. Free advice: Don't give up your day job; I don't think even any of the right-wing "think" tanks will hire you.
And out of 5 million Ill give you this one here:
Pelosi Ripped by Fellow Democrat for Delaying Stock-Trade Bill
Democratic Representative Abigail Spanberger lashed out at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other party leaders who she accused of dragging their feet on legislation to ban stock trading by lawmakers.
I did click your link, and got:
Is your delicious "proof" of insider trading behind Bloomberg's pay wall? No.
Thanks very much, RVonse. Your response to my request is almost delicious in what it tells us about right-wing "thinking" and right-wing "research."
...
There is a whole group of stock traders doing nothing but following their trades because they know they are beating the S&P by a huge amount.
Are you just PRETENDING to be stupid? I'm supposed to take my pick of 5 million hits? (Why don't YOU read up on Sean Hannity F**king his daughter? 
) If you DO NOT HAVE a single source, just say so.Then what the hell would you have me cite if not google? I can not read your mind about what you think is accurate news. But Pelosi and her husband inside trading has been talked about ad nausim by all the outlets..take your pick. Basically she got caught and was forced to pass a law against it and then retracted the law and got started again. There is a whole group of stock traders doing nothing but following their trades because they know they are beating the S&P by a huge amount.
Wow! I typed "Sean Hannity f**ks his daughter" into the Google search engine, substituting an ancient and well-known Anglo-Saxon word (though it "wasn't in a single English language dictionary from 1795 to 1965") for the "f**ks." and got "About 5,250,000 results (0.43 seconds)" That's 5% more than you report for your Pelosi search. Who are your other political heroes? Should I repeat the experiment? (That wasn't cherry-picked: It was the very first search I tried while laughing at your post.)
Your approach to research is ... unique. Free advice: Don't give up your day job; I don't think even any of the right-wing "think" tanks will hire you.
And out of 5 million Ill give you this one here:
Pelosi Ripped by Fellow Democrat for Delaying Stock-Trade Bill
Democratic Representative Abigail Spanberger lashed out at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other party leaders who she accused of dragging their feet on legislation to ban stock trading by lawmakers.
I did click your link, and got:
Is your delicious "proof" of insider trading behind Bloomberg's pay wall? No.
Thanks very much, RVonse. Your response to my request is almost delicious in what it tells us about right-wing "thinking" and right-wing "research."
It should tell you that both “right wing thinking” and “right wing research” are oxymorons, a fact brought into sharp focus courtesy of our local exemplars.
www.livemint.com
How about specific links, not Google queries?
Now I understand why so many MAGAtards think youtube comments are a legitimate source.
lol. You know that if a whole group of stock traders were doing nothing but following my trades, it would look like I was insider trading too. Because, you know, depending on how much power that group of traders was wielding, it would make ALL my picks winners.
