Isn't the city motto:
Hiring freezes actually happen with entities such as government agencies and companies in mature industries that are seeing their market degrade. If a tech company needs a tech person who can do X, they hire someone who can do X.
Sure, there was also a purge of non techs but there was a large number of actual techs let go, including the poor saps in H-1B visas who are going to find it a little bit tricky to get hired elsewhere due to the nature of how work visas are transferred. As far as Google and Meta hiring ex Twitter techs, good for them. I actually thought some of these companies had hiring freezes but happy enough if that is no longer the case.
Hiring freezes actually happen with entities such as government agencies and companies in mature industries that are seeing their market degrade. If a tech company needs a tech person who can do X, they hire someone who can do X.
Sure, there was also a purge of non techs but there was a large number of actual techs let go, including the poor saps in H-1B visas who are going to find it a little bit tricky to get hired elsewhere due to the nature of how work visas are transferred. As far as Google and Meta hiring ex Twitter techs, good for them. I actually thought some of these companies had hiring freezes but happy enough if that is no longer the case.
Hiring freezes actually happen with entities such as government agencies and companies in mature industries that are seeing their market degrade. If a tech company needs a tech person who can do X, they hire someone who can do X.
Sure, there was also a purge of non techs but there was a large number of actual techs let go, including the poor saps in H-1B visas who are going to find it a little bit tricky to get hired elsewhere due to the nature of how work visas are transferred. As far as Google and Meta hiring ex Twitter techs, good for them. I actually thought some of these companies had hiring freezes but happy enough if that is no longer the case.
Is there any purpose to your response other than just get your post count up or waste bandwidth?
Apparently it annoyed you, so that's a plus. But it was obviously a direct reply to your belief that 1) the tech companies are operating under hiring freezes, and 2) a hiring freeze at such a company would carry any weight. Do you believe in the Easter Bunny too?Hiring freezes actually happen with entities such as government agencies and companies in mature industries that are seeing their market degrade. If a tech company needs a tech person who can do X, they hire someone who can do X.
Sure, there was also a purge of non techs but there was a large number of actual techs let go, including the poor saps in H-1B visas who are going to find it a little bit tricky to get hired elsewhere due to the nature of how work visas are transferred. As far as Google and Meta hiring ex Twitter techs, good for them. I actually thought some of these companies had hiring freezes but happy enough if that is no longer the case.
Is there any purpose to your response other than just get your post count up or waste bandwidth?
You flatter yourself.Apparently it annoyed you, so that's a plus.Hiring freezes actually happen with entities such as government agencies and companies in mature industries that are seeing their market degrade. If a tech company needs a tech person who can do X, they hire someone who can do X.
Sure, there was also a purge of non techs but there was a large number of actual techs let go, including the poor saps in H-1B visas who are going to find it a little bit tricky to get hired elsewhere due to the nature of how work visas are transferred. As far as Google and Meta hiring ex Twitter techs, good for them. I actually thought some of these companies had hiring freezes but happy enough if that is no longer the case.
Is there any purpose to your response other than just get your post count up or waste bandwidth?
LOL. Shall I explain hiring freezes to you again?You flatter yourself.Apparently it annoyed you, so that's a plus.Hiring freezes actually happen with entities such as government agencies and companies in mature industries that are seeing their market degrade. If a tech company needs a tech person who can do X, they hire someone who can do X.
Sure, there was also a purge of non techs but there was a large number of actual techs let go, including the poor saps in H-1B visas who are going to find it a little bit tricky to get hired elsewhere due to the nature of how work visas are transferred. As far as Google and Meta hiring ex Twitter techs, good for them. I actually thought some of these companies had hiring freezes but happy enough if that is no longer the case.
Is there any purpose to your response other than just get your post count up or waste bandwidth?
I said thought there was a hiring freeze. It's in bold. And some companies did have hiring freezes, including Google and some companies may still have hiring freezes.
Basically, the Chief Twit got rid of pretty much all of the maintenance staff. Things will run fine for a while. Maybe they'll degrade over time, maybe they'll come to a screeching halt when a high-severity flaw is discovered somewhere in the software stack.
Nah, the guy running Space X, Starlink and self driving cars surely has access to resources to make certain security is up to snuff. Hell I just work on accounting in the plumbing industry and made enough friends to keep my house on the up and up and I make under 40k a year. I can't imagine what the x richest man on earth could do.
He's gotten rid of most everybody that knows how it works. Anybody brought in to fix it will first have to figure out what they're fixing.
It’s a microblogging site. How high do you think the learning curve would be?
