Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 46,751
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
Time to put two crosses in it.
Uh oh...
Technically, the OP title is historical and speaks to who was dealing with Musk and is still accurate.Can we change the thread title to accurately reflect the degree of stupidity we have currently, somehow, attained?
That was meant as a joke, just to be clear.I'd like to keep the Twitter name in place in the thread title -- it's how we've known of this online service until recent days.
BTW, Elon Musk ought to do what Google and Facebook have done, treat X as a sort of holding-company brand, while keeping Twitter's name going, like Alphabet for Google and Meta for Facebook.
|
Reporting the truth is the defense against this.
Jackboots!
Elon Musk is suing a nonprofit that researches hate speech on social media, accusing it of driving away advertisers from his company X, formerly known as Twitter.
(Apology if this was already posted)
Reporting the truth is the defense against this.
Jackboots!
Elon Musk is suing a nonprofit that researches hate speech on social media, accusing it of driving away advertisers from his company X, formerly known as Twitter.
(Apology if this was already posted)
After Investigation and Complaints, Twitter Removes ‘X’ on Headquarters - The New York TimesAn “X” sign, installed on the roof of the company’s headquarters in San Francisco as part of its rebranding, lacked proper permits, officials said.
“A building permit is required to make sure the sign is structurally sound and installed safely,” Patrick Hannan, a spokesman for the San Francisco Department of Building Inspection, said in a statement on Sunday. “Planning review and approval is also necessary for the installation of this sign.”
An inspector went to the Twitter headquarters on Friday to notify the company that it was in violation and to request access to the roof to inspect the sign, according to a complaint filed with the city.
Twitter representatives told the inspector that the sign was a “temporary lighted sign for an event,” the complaint said.
Inspectors with the city attempted to gain access to the roof a second time on Saturday, but “upon arrival access was denied again by tenant,” the complaint said.
The sign was installed on Friday to reflect the company’s new branding and spurred immediate concern. Over the weekend, the city received 24 complaints, which included concerns about its structural safety and flashing lights.
One complaint described “extremely intense white stroboscopic light” that was “causing distress and nausea.”
Another wrote that the sign looked “really unstable,” adding that “a decent earthquake is going to send that thing down on the street!”
Also mentioning Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi and Snap CEO Evan Spiegel as wanting to do that.Four years ago, a billionaire tech executive leading one of the world’s pre-eminent social platforms laid out a vision to transform it into an app that could do it all. In an online manifesto, he wrote that the app would not only be central to written communications but have audio, video, payments, commerce and more.
The idea was akin to that of an “everything app” espoused recently by Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter. But the dream belonged to Mark Zuckerberg, the founder and chief executive of Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. In a 2019 blog post, Mr. Zuckerberg outlined how he would turn WhatsApp into an app that could be a platform for many “kinds of private services.”
Yet those efforts fell short, with the tech executives unable to replicate the magic that has abounded in Asia with “super apps” like China’s WeChat, Japan’s Line and South Korea’s KakaoTalk. U.S. tech giants have instead run into cultural differences, regulatory scrutiny and a splintered financial system that has made the quest to build such apps more difficult.
...
In the United States, people are “accustomed to single-service apps, which makes moving to a multiservice app a bit disorienting,” said Dan Prud’homme, an assistant professor of business at Florida International University. “To some extent, U.S. customers don’t like feeling that they are too beholden to a single firm for their everyday needs.”