Really, probably this.Banks love that shit! They get even less interested in meddling when the guy they loaned so much money has driven the company into the ground quite stupidly.
Musk is such an idiotic asshole. I can't think of more than one change he has made to Twitter that has been an improvement for the user.
Every time I read a news article and it quotes X tweets, it's "X, formerly known as Twitter." Surely, this is a positive change for ink (and electron) demand in their respective markets.
I feel like the reporters should stop helping him transition. Jusy call it X, and if people domn’t get that, it’s his problem.Every time I read a news article and it quotes X tweets, it's "X, formerly known as Twitter." Surely, this is a positive change for ink (and electron) demand in their respective markets.
I feel like the reporters should stop helping him transition. Jusy call it X, and if people domn’t get that, it’s his problem.Every time I read a news article and it quotes X tweets, it's "X, formerly known as Twitter." Surely, this is a positive change for ink (and electron) demand in their respective markets.
Why are they helping him with his problem that he created?
X, whatever the fuck that is, will charge new users $1 a year to use its service, whatever the fuck that is.I feel like the reporters should stop helping him transition. Jusy call it X, and if people domn’t get that, it’s his problem.Every time I read a news article and it quotes X tweets, it's "X, formerly known as Twitter." Surely, this is a positive change for ink (and electron) demand in their respective markets.
Why are they helping him with his problem that he created?
I heard IBM did that as well.In the ongoing, my company's valuation is too damn high saga; Apple exercises its right to stop advertising on Twitter after Musk's endorsement of an antisemitic comment.