KeepTalking
Code Monkey
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2010
- Messages
- 4,641
- Location
- St. Louis Metro East
- Basic Beliefs
- Atheist, Secular Humanist, Pastifarian, IPUnitard
Perhaps they were not suspended for sexual assault, but for breaking other school or team rules revealed by the video of the incident. These may include, but are not limited to, underage drinking, drug use, or video taping themselves performing a sex act.
Dismal has already shown that that is not so,
He did no such thing, he only provided a rebuttal to my post, in which he contended that it would be fake news if what I posted was correct. His dismal post has already been addressed by another poster, showing that his contention is just the same bullshit we always expect from dismal, an attempt to turn things around on his perceived opposition, which nearly always fails.
but if it was, it highlights more female privilege. Did you know that if a female student alleges rape (even if falsely) she is immune from any punishment due to any other violations of the college rules such as underage drinking or drug use. It gives female students more incentive to cry rape.
Here is a relevant quote from the article that lead me to bring up the points in my previous post:
University President Eric Kaler wrote in a letter to donors Wednesday that football coach Tracy Claeys, with athletic director Mark Coyle’s support, decided to suspend the players from the team ahead of its Dec. 27 bowl game in San Diego.
They were suspended by the coach of the team, this indicates to me that they broke team rules. I doubt that the female student in this case was on the football team, so it would be hard for her to be suspended from the team for breaking team rules.