Finally, you got something right. It is a straw man because it has nothing whatsoever to do with the transgendered. Duh.
Not to mention that the whole reason that it is unethical to claim one is black is the same thing that CRT, something else metaphor seems to think is not accurate, predicts: that being black is about how society at large treats people and gives or withholds advantages of society on the basis of a seeming.
This is about Metaphor INSISTING on the seeming being both accurate and a basis for discrimination by proxy. And then in another thread claiming there is no systemic disadvantage in the first place.
The rest of us acknowledge that in any situation, only the relevant factors to the actual topic of discussion should be brought in, and nothing else.
The problem here is conflation with identifying as black (culture, language, friends, concerns, priorities) and with identifying as black (had social disadvantages on the basis of seeming).
The thing is, this is not a situation that transfers to gender identification: identifying as causes the same general disadvantages in employment and on the street. It means the same pink tax, it means the same catcalls (or worse!) It means the same fear of rape and assault as many people who both meta and Emily freely accept as women.
So what that the don't fear pregnancy?
An ass rapes just as traumatically as a vagina. A penis is no magic Ward against it; it just means you're more likely to be murdered afterward.
They just deny civility to such because "science", as if the last time we brought "science" into discussions of how to treat people in society ended well. It's almost as if the science that is valuable, contextually, to the discussion is social science rather than biology.