Seems to be so common in procedurals. "Crack detective is forced to match wits with homicidal stalker with killer obsession." And the villain is used as a stock character for season after season, or sequel after sequel, as it were.
Very true. But there's a certain substance to most of the books. For me, I like the procedural aspect, the nitty gritty of police work and forensics. I stumbled over the
In Death series after Patricia Cornwell could not get out of her own head to write a coherent story anymore. So Detective Eve Dallas replaced Kay Scarpetta. Surprised me, too, since the
In Death books are futuristic and set in New York in the year 2060.
As such, I take it that matching wits is part of the job.
Creation in Death, for example - Dallas has to go up against a disturbed killer she caught before that escaped from prison, a case that causes a lot of her colleagues to take unwanted trips down memory lane. That book is just under
Red Dragon by Thomas Harris in my top 10. It is as much a meditation on death as it is a crime thriller.
It's just that I have a bias when the main character is too much of the spotlight. The great thing about the
In Death series is that it is about Dallas as much as Roarke.
Roarke is a wealthy businessman and an elite socialite who knows everyone. We get that the press adores him, so you come to expect people fawning over his character.
But reading a book where a homicide detective is sorting through her fan mail to find her own stalker? I could not swallow this. (To be fair, neither could Dallas by her attitude).
Less "star cop" stuff, more grit.