What Happened?

[Derec]

You got special treatment when you came here.

1. Wrong!
2. Non-responsive to my question.

 

[Patooka]

I'll answer your question when you respond to this point you conveniently clipped out before.

I don't think they are "poorly trained fucknuts". Unless you are talking about police. So until we settle the issue of "poorly trained fucknuts" my answer is valid.

Or, better yet, since I consider the police to be "poorly trained fucknuts" then I think it is YOU defending "poorly trained fucknuts".

Yes yes. All Police are poorly trained fucknuts. I'm confused as well why Libertarianism is considered a fringe ideal perpetuated by idiots.

You know Red Dawn was a bullshit fantasy even when the movie came out, right?

 

[Derec]

You know Red Dawn was a bullshit fantasy even when the movie came out, right?

Nobody puts Baby in the corner as long as she has access to a machine gun!

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

You know Red Dawn was a bullshit fantasy even when the movie came out, right?

Not sure how that relates to anything anyone posted in this tread, but okay.

 

[ZiprHead]

I'll answer your question when you respond to this point you conveniently clipped out before.

I don't think they are "poorly trained fucknuts". Unless you are talking about police. So until we settle the issue of "poorly trained fucknuts" my answer is valid.

Or, better yet, since I consider the police to be "poorly trained fucknuts" then I think it is YOU defending "poorly trained fucknuts".

Well, you profess to be a libertarian so your thought processes are already questionable. Basically what you think isn't worth a popcorn fart.

 

[ZiprHead]

You got special treatment when you came here.

1. Wrong!

So everyone in the line of people who wanted to come here at the time you did got in too. Good to know.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

I'll answer your question when you respond to this point you conveniently clipped out before.

I don't think they are "poorly trained fucknuts". Unless you are talking about police. So until we settle the issue of "poorly trained fucknuts" my answer is valid.

Or, better yet, since I consider the police to be "poorly trained fucknuts" then I think it is YOU defending "poorly trained fucknuts".

Well, you profess to be a libertarian so your thought processes are already questionable. Basically what you think isn't worth a popcorn fart.

You didn't answer the question, of course.

 

[TV and credit cards]

I'll answer your question when you respond to this point you conveniently clipped out before.

I don't think they are "poorly trained fucknuts". Unless you are talking about police. So until we settle the issue of "poorly trained fucknuts" my answer is valid.

Or, better yet, since I consider the police to be "poorly trained fucknuts" then I think it is YOU defending "poorly trained fucknuts".

28 states do not even require a person to fire a gun before allowing them to carry one in public. What "training" is it you think these "fucknuts" receive?

What is your basis for assuming police are "poorly trained"? Without citing references, I think the assumption is all police receive some minimum weapons and tactics training.

 

[ZiprHead]

I'll answer your question when you respond to this point you conveniently clipped out before.

I don't think they are "poorly trained fucknuts". Unless you are talking about police. So until we settle the issue of "poorly trained fucknuts" my answer is valid.

Or, better yet, since I consider the police to be "poorly trained fucknuts" then I think it is YOU defending "poorly trained fucknuts".

28 states do not even require a person to fire a gun before allowing them to carry one in public. What "training" is it you think these "fucknuts" receive?

What is your basis for assuming police are "poorly trained"? Without citing references, I think the assumption is all police receive some minimum weapons and tactics training.

And classroom judicial system training.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

I'll answer your question when you respond to this point you conveniently clipped out before.

I don't think they are "poorly trained fucknuts". Unless you are talking about police. So until we settle the issue of "poorly trained fucknuts" my answer is valid.

Or, better yet, since I consider the police to be "poorly trained fucknuts" then I think it is YOU defending "poorly trained fucknuts".

28 states do not even require a person to fire a gun before allowing them to carry one in public. What "training" is it you think these "fucknuts" receive?

I'm not the one who referred to them as such, so you should ask the one who introduced the term.

What is your basis for assuming police are "poorly trained"? Without citing references, I think the assumption is all police receive some minimum weapons and tactics training.

Court OKs Barring High IQs for Cops

 

[laughing dog]

Translation - your claim is horseshit.

As usual you are wrong.

No, you made a claim of fact which you refuse to substantiate. Until you substantiate it, it is horseshit.

Are you or are you not denouncing BP's armed occupation of the California legislature? If not, then I hardly need to look through the archives, do I?

You said I disavowed the Black Panthers not their armed occupation of the legislature. Please either learn the English language or pay attention to what you write.

 

[Derec]

No, you made a claim of fact which you refuse to substantiate. Until you substantiate it, it is horseshit.

That's BS. Again, I do not have time right now to go to through many years of posts.

You said I disavowed the Black Panthers not their armed occupation of the legislature. Please either learn the English language or pay attention to what you write.

How about you stop playing silly games and clarify your position.

 

[ZiprHead]

How is this even legal?

 

[laughing dog]

No, you made a claim of fact which you refuse to substantiate. Until you substantiate it, it is horseshit.

That's BS. Again, I do not have time right now to go to through many years of posts.

That is bs. You refuse to substantiate to your claim.

How about you stop playing silly games and clarify your position.

I am against any armed invasion of a legislature. Duh.

 

[dannyk]

View attachment 27633

How is this even legal?

Is that some sort of rocket launcher? If so that is craziness!

 

[Jarhyn]

View attachment 27633

How is this even legal?

Is that some sort of rocket launcher? If so that is craziness!

Looks like an AT-4

It is indeed a rocket launcher. If it is real, it is most certainly not legal.

 

[dannyk]

View attachment 27633

How is this even legal?

Is that some sort of rocket launcher? If so that is craziness!

Looks like an AT-4

It is indeed a rocket launcher. If it is real, it is most certainly not legal.

It may be a fake/replica according to this source

 

[ZiprHead]

Looks like an AT-4

It is indeed a rocket launcher. If it is real, it is most certainly not legal.

It may be a fake/replica according to this source

I was informed the yellow band indicates it's a training tool, not fireable. So basically he's walking around with a toy gun.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

View attachment 27633

How is this even legal?

If it were loaded it obviously wouldn't be--you would need licenses 6 ways from Sunday (off the to of my head: it's NFA regulated, it's classed as a destructive device, you also need a blaster's license) and even then you probably couldn't just carry it around because of the explosives in the warhead.

However, why do you assume there's a rocket in it? Several such weapons systems use one-shot launchers. The spent launch tubes are unregulated (new rounds come in their own tube, thus no reloads exist, thus it's just a tube with a trigger) and pretty easy to get.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

View attachment 27633

How is this even legal?

If it were loaded it obviously wouldn't be--you would need licenses 6 ways from Sunday (off the to of my head: it's NFA regulated, it's classed as a destructive device, you also need a blaster's license) and even then you probably couldn't just carry it around because of the explosives in the warhead.

However, why do you assume there's a rocket in it? Several such weapons systems use one-shot launchers. The spent launch tubes are unregulated (new rounds come in their own tube, thus no reloads exist, thus it's just a tube with a trigger) and pretty easy to get.

I suppose it does beg the question... why the heck cart the thing in the first place then? Just to get his wife off of his case,

Guy: I told you one day our liberties would be at risk and this puppy will be what helps saves it!
Wife: It's a hollow, missile-less piece of crap that's been taking up too much space in the basement. How is that going to save our liberty.
Guy: I'm going to look butch and intimidating out there!
Wife: Fine... get me a Italian Cold Cut Trio while you are out there Mister Butch.