Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 46,886
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
Pretty Women - This musical answers the question of, was there a need for a musical version of the popular film from 1990. The answer is an emphatic NO!!! The movie provides us with a cute Horatio Algers tale. The musical, needing to pad out time, has to take a somewhat more philosophical route regarding the male lead... which in the end is just about a rich guy who likes a... well... pretty woman... because she is a nice pretty woman. Worse yet, they devote a song that is dedicated to vanity and how the female lead is important exclusively because she is "pretty".
The movie works because it is all on the surface. Male lead grows a little, female lead gets into a more formal relationship with a very wealthy guy.
The musical doesn't work because the movie was all on the surface. Songs about the male lead wanting to change (from what?... didn't get into that) and the poor woman not wanting to go back to being poor (umm... need a better motivation here than just not wanting to be poor) really don't provide much emotional motivation into the characters.
The Happy Man and Butler characters are the glue that keeps this from being a snooze fest. Cast is great (though I'd say the movie worked with Alexander's role better than the musical, he is barely a heel in this), but the music is pedestrian and again, the songs are padded. The opera scene was great. The female vocalist was absurd. The male vocalist was great as well, to the point I was suspicious it was recorded. The female lead was moving though and her voice tracked. The humor was mixed from cliche to good. I kept making notes how it could have been funnier, wasn't trying to, but it needed work. For instance, the opera scene should have been done differently. They should have gotten up to the booth and the show starts and she sighs and says
"Cats?"
"I thought people liked Cats."
"Nobody likes Cats."
And then have a bunch of people with caricature cat heads dancing around. The thing is on National Tour, and I'm feeling it should still be off Broadway.
2 of 4
The movie works because it is all on the surface. Male lead grows a little, female lead gets into a more formal relationship with a very wealthy guy.
The musical doesn't work because the movie was all on the surface. Songs about the male lead wanting to change (from what?... didn't get into that) and the poor woman not wanting to go back to being poor (umm... need a better motivation here than just not wanting to be poor) really don't provide much emotional motivation into the characters.
The Happy Man and Butler characters are the glue that keeps this from being a snooze fest. Cast is great (though I'd say the movie worked with Alexander's role better than the musical, he is barely a heel in this), but the music is pedestrian and again, the songs are padded. The opera scene was great. The female vocalist was absurd. The male vocalist was great as well, to the point I was suspicious it was recorded. The female lead was moving though and her voice tracked. The humor was mixed from cliche to good. I kept making notes how it could have been funnier, wasn't trying to, but it needed work. For instance, the opera scene should have been done differently. They should have gotten up to the booth and the show starts and she sighs and says
"Cats?"
"I thought people liked Cats."
"Nobody likes Cats."
And then have a bunch of people with caricature cat heads dancing around. The thing is on National Tour, and I'm feeling it should still be off Broadway.
2 of 4