• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

What Live Event Did You See (Rate it)?

The Book of Mormon - A fun romp that I feel completely fumbled exposition potential with the origins of the Mormon people prior to the Assyrian sacking. They kept it simple-ish and kept the story of the origins in North America. It went over-the-top as one would expect South Park creators to do Felt the first act was a bit weak, again because I was looking forward to more Mormon/Hebrew history. Second Act was better and the local rendition to the upper brass was pretty much gold. 3 of 4 Loses a little for a tad too much crass.

I missed this when it came to Melbourne so was very happy to catch it recently.

Viewed as a comedy rather than history it was gold.

Didn't lose a single point from me. Loved the crass.

Bit astonished by the level of security. Bag searches. Thought it might be due to fanatics.

No. Evidently that is now just standard. It is some time since I've seen live shows.
 
The Girl From North Country - I was forewarned by MIL that her friends walked out at intermission. I know jack about Bob Dylan lyrics and music. Overall, I loved it. It isn't an easy watch and it isn't fun. But it evokes emotion and it isn't the same darn score/show that repetitive Broadway shows often offer. The pace was also great. I wiuldn't say a lot happens in the small tale, but the pace never felt slow. I was surprised that Intermission came so quickly.

I thought it was funny at some of the points people were laughing at mental illness. Yes, there is comic relief but I think people mistook mental illness for comedy at points.

The score was pleasant and non-Broadway derivative. The cast was awesome. Could see either Frances McDermod or Melissa Leo playing the role of Elizabeth Laine.

It isn't a happy tale, being Depression era and Dylan scoped, wouldn't expect it as such. Times are hard, situations harder, crazy people want to fo back to those days.

4 of 4
 
Mrs. Doubtfire - A show that would have benefited with less music/singing. They had some musical bits that were genius and they should have just let them stand on their own, instead of trying to stuff more singing needlessly in to pad the show. Lead actor, was good. Not Robin Williams. And no, this isn't a Robin Williams thing. The Genie we saw for Aladdin was phenomenal, even with the high bar. Two of the children were really not that good. The eldest "child" actor was much better. I have no idea why the boy actor was even there. He felt wooden. Yes, just kids, but I've seen enough kids on stage, and this was the first show where the underage crew were underwhelming, which is a problem because they are kind of notable characters. 3 of 4

Funny Girl
- No, this isn't about Rita Rudner. *sigh* It is about (loosely about) an actress star from the turn of the century. The female lead was out of this world good. The music was older and different. The NY accent made understanding lyrics harder. The story is cliché and it'd be nice if maybe they sold it a bit different, sell the female lead's insecurity as to why she is in the bad relationship, provide them an opportunity to grow out of it. I wish the show was a bit shorter! 2.5 of 4
 
In 1980 I saw The Kinks at Umass Amherst.

Starting 1982 to 1995 I saw about 100 Grateful Dead Concerts

Saw Warren Zevon at a bar in Amherst. He came out after midnight totally drunk

I saw a few The Dead concerts in the early 2000s

Then from 2019 to 2023 I saw 7 Dead and Company concerts.

Grateful Dead tickets in the 1980s/1990's were about $25.
Now tickets are at least $150 and up to $600. Nuts. Ticketmaster!!!

Dead and Company are playing something like 20 shows at the Sphere in Las Vegas this summer but I'm taking a pass. I hope they they will be on Nugs.net.
 
Oh, if it counts I was at a Canon dealer event at a trade show in Las Vegas in the late 1980's/early 1990s. Canon invited their dealers and some industry analysts and Canon hired Dolly Parton to play a set. Not really my thing but I guess I can say I saw Dolly Parton.

I wonder what Canon paid to hire her for a private event like that.
 
Saw the Turtles play at Lock 3 several years ago. Keyboardist was Greg Hawkes from The Cars, guitarist had been touring with Alan Parsons. They played some Zappa, it was a concert I would never have gone to on a whim, but my MIL liked them, so we went and I was glad we did.
 
Company - Reimagined show from the 70s (I think). It is an interesting concept and I loved the physical presentation of the show. Additionally, they had a couple scenes with multiple copies of the characters running around which was effective. The gay marriage doubt sequence was brilliantly hilarious! The creators did a wonderful job of using the stage and props very well. Downside, I don't think the story actually went anywhere, which is a positive and negative. They didn't force anything, which is always refreshing, but it felt like there wasn't all too much gained in the story. Felt like a more active version of The Humans, where we are following along a larger group of people doing their typical day to day things. Definitely had high ups, but much like The Humans, the story is compact and doesn't take you too far.

Back to the Future - Well, when I heard about this show coming out, I was thinking, maybe. It isn't something I was dying to see, but it had some organic music potential. People I knew said good things about it. Long story short, it was generally boring. It was the movie with too much music shoved into. Of the music bits, the bedroom scene and the ending sequence for Act I were very well put together. Loved it. But that was it. And I know the crowd at the show is generally older than me, so why aren't they seeing half the jokes from a mile up the road?!

One opportunity I thought they missed was the whole "Back to the Future" thing to begin with. I'm watching the show thinking that'd be a great intro scene with the Doc. Marty says something to effect that "I need to get back to where I came from" and Doc immediately interjects, "No! That isn't marketable enough!" a tiny bit of banter and they go into the marketing song for the movie and finish with Back to the Future.

Visual screen effects were really good. The car... for our show... from what I've heard, we didn't get the best experience. The Intermission took a while. A long while. And my wife and I were wondering what was taking so long. Then, an announcement. Sorry for the inconvenience. I'm thinking, rats, McFly just got squished by something and they need the understudy. Act II finally starts, and things are going well, until the final sequence with the car, and I noticed the car was moving the wrong way with the animation, but figured "don't worry about it". That's when the current went down. "Technical difficulties". Show "lasted" 3:15, like Hamilton long, but without all the material. Finally the show starts back up, they hit rewind, presumably because the car sequence was programmed and couldn't just start in the middle. The car ends up moving the right way in the sequence. They finish it up, and the final effect apparently isn't as good as it could have been, but still pretty good. Sounds like the car is pushing the envelop a bit.

Overall, the only thing I learned from this was that they missed pronounced Gigawatts because he indicated there were 9 zeros for the wattage. I could have lived without seeing this. I'm looking forward to next season, no bloody Hollywood remakes, except one of my favorite movies, Some Like it Hot, which is ripe for adding music too.
 
Bogan Shakespeare.

A bogan retelling of the bards best known lovebirds. Shortened down to an hour, modernised, Australianised and just plain funny. Nice Q and A after the show too.
 
Went to see Wicked at the Orpheum yesterday. What a show! I've wanted to see it ever since its original run, but I was in no sort of financial position to do so in 2003. The cast was phenomenal, with Galinda and the Wizard really standing out. It was nice to see the old theatre again, too, haven't been to a performance there since before the pandemic.
 
A Beautiful Noise - Neil Diamond whateva ...

We actually traded these tickets for another show. However, my Mom loves Neil Diamond, so we got very close seats as a gift for her. Funny thing. We have tickets that are in the front of our pay group. They aren't the best seats, but they are pretty good. When watching from that mid lower bowl position you see a show, choreography of one unit. From up close you see a show that has more individuals in it, almost feel like you are peering at them it private.

Regardless, I had no expectations for the show and had a passing knowledge of the music because my Mom really likes him. 5 or ao minutes into the show I'm sold. Harmonies are ridiculoua to the point you think they are piped in. Guy doing Diamond was spot on, at least voice wise.

The show did a remarkable job of weaving Diamond's lyrics into a self retrospection that needed resolving in the present. Like The Temptations, I learned from the show and thr cast and music were top notched.

I was pleasantly surprised with this one. People put real thought into constructing this.
 
Some Like It Hot - Oh boy! This is a tough one. Had they changed the name to Some Like it Hotter, I'd been a bit more empathetic with some of the changes. This show is more "woke" than Fox and Friends! As a primer, Some Like it Hot is probably my second favorite film, behind another Billy Wilder film The Apartment. It is Silver Screen perfection! I think one must venture very very carefully when modifying anything Wilder has done.

Sweet Sue is provided a more centralized role in the film, likely to pad out the musical. While not the star of the show, she certainly feels like the central foundation of it. She and Gerald's characters are black, which comes into the musical for about the first quarter of the show, and then they forget about it. The person playing Sugar (Monroe's character) is also Black, but they don't really ever go in to it with her character, so it is uncertain if she is playing a white girl or not, like Eliza Doolittle's father in My Fair Lady (a bit more obvious in that show. Sugar is played as her own character, as trying to fill Monroe's void-less charisma is impossible. Funny, I'd say the person playing sugar was likely much more talented than Monroe, but she was so much smaller than Monroe on stage. Odd how charisma works.

They generally follow along with the story, just with a bit more discreteness on the shooting. The first half of the show, which takes them down (and over) to San Diego, felt a lot like filler. A few songs fill in the gaps of the film, providing background, some more effectively than others. Broadway shows have cliché bits, that I wish they'd recognize was cliché.

The second half of the show uses music a lot more effectively at filling in gaps of the film. Gerald/Daphne meets the wealthy suiter, who plays the cliché role of the outside looking in goofball element. He does it well, but it was again... cliché.

The chase scene that develops near the end is very very well choreographed! Spats isn't in town for the fans of the opera convention, but rather to ice the two witnesses (which is a bit odd seeing you'd let goons do that stuff, you wouldn't do that yourself as a mob boss). So the ending is little less bloody, but well performed.

The trouble comes about with the Transgender angle, which, while it got a few hoots and hollars, felt unrealistic, ham fisted, and brutally inorganic. Gerald discovers he is gender fluid. But his road to get to this point was extraordinarily undeveloped, making it a forced plot device rather than anything regarding inner discovery, growth, etc... It also fucks up the entire comic premise of the plot and how it ends! Worse, the rich guy doesn't even need to be told what's going on... he seems to have known and is good with it. I look too deeply into some of this stuff, but in a comedy, a lustful old guy going for a guy only pretending to be a woman is funny. Trying to twist that into a lustful old guy meaningfully falling in love with a guy who was pretending to be a woman but now thinks he is 50/50... all as a fair accompli? Oi! Lazy and illegitimate writing!

Speaking of which,, my issue with this then gets exposed more with Sugar and Joe. Sugar and Joe get together in the end in Some Like It Hot not because either of them changes. They finish the film as the exact same flawed people they enter into it. You know it is doomed! You don't dwell much on it due to the line "Nobody's perfect" that sends the movie out with Gerald befuddled as to what is to come next. In this show, Joe is the same manipulative guy, manipulating the situation, lying to Sugar. But they pretend that he is a diamond in the rough... when in fact the only time he is honest is when he admits who he is. Sugar then goes on about how she saw the golden hearts of both of the faux people Joe was playing (ie making up and lying about). And so she falls for Joe. WTF?! You got Gerald who has this inner discovery on his identity and determines he feels he is both a man and woman... and the main female star who is way out of Joe's league does the ole Hollywood high prospect female going for the middle-aged bum... the anti-My Fair Lady adaptation update. Again, a forced meaningful connecting of hearts.

With a show, there are limitations with doing certain things, like shooting a tommy gun after popping out of a birthday cake. So I can appreciate some of the modifications that will lead to, though they could have swapped things up a little bit better. I felt the music could have been a bit less filler. Had the first act been a bit less filler, that'd made the show more enjoyable. The trouble in the end is the incongruent social adaptations really held the show back from being better. As per the norm, the show quality was top rate. The cast brilliant, Sweet Sue holds the show together brilliantly. Sweet Sue's assistant probably had the best comic lines as well, if not a little bit obvious, but well performed.

9 of 4 ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom