• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

White Evangelicals Can’t Whitewash Their Complicity in Donald Trump’s Atrocities

phands

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
1,976
Location
New York, Manhattan, Upper West Side
Basic Beliefs
Hardcore Atheist
These scum deserve some good old testament revenge....except I don't condone violence. I'll settle for penury and disgrace....and the cessation of existence of their idiotic cults.

The second most appalling number from Election Night 2016 may have been the fact that approximately 80% of white evangelicals voted for Donald Trump (give or take a point). While it’s not surprising that conservative Christians voted for the Republican nominee, their support meant that they weren’t turned off by Trump’s rhetoric, his grabbing of women, his bigotry, his ignorance, his deception, or anything else that should have been disqualifying.




Trump has only gotten worse since the election. Despite giving evangelicals two Supreme Court justices (and counting) and plenty of other judges with lifetime appointments, he’s been everything his critics said he would be in terms of awfulness. That means evangelicals have to constantly defend their support for a disastrous president. After all, other than a handful of voices on FOX News, it’s not like pastors are bragging about Trump. They treat him like a necessary evil while simultaneously trying to paint themselves as above the drama, as if they’re not directly responsible for any of the horrible things he does.


But they are responsible. White evangelicals voted for him in a landslide and they continue to support him in roughly the same numbers. Even if some young evangelicals are distancing themselves from the faith and the GOP, most white evangelicals have no problem feeding Trump’s ego until he feeds them right back.


It doesn’t do Christianity any favors to say that out loud, though. That’s why we’re now seeing pushback from evangelical circles against the idea that they’re complicit in Trump’s atrocities.

https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com...their-complicity-in-donald-trumps-atrocities/
 
I'm willing to condone some violence. ;)

Can you elaborate?

What level of violence to white evangelicals would you find acceptable? What kinds of violence? Violence to their property? Their persons?

Would you condone "some" violence to all white evangelicals? Or just those who voted for Trump?
 
Last edited:
They voted anti-Clinton, not pro-Trump.
phands doesn't seem to understand realpolitik
 
They voted anti-Clinton, not pro-Trump.
phands doesn't seem to understand realpolitik

Really? Because their complete and total embrace of him over the past couple of years would suggest that they actually like him.
 
They voted anti-Clinton, not pro-Trump.
phands doesn't seem to understand realpolitik

Really? Because their complete and total embrace of him over the past couple of years would suggest that they actually like him.

Also, if actual facts have any bearing on the matter, more people voted for Hillary, by about 3 million, than for the shitgibbon. In addition, the Russian helped, as did Comey's very suspicious timing, and of course, decades of gerrymandering. LIRC doesn't seem to understand....facts.
 
They voted anti-Clinton, not pro-Trump.
phands doesn't seem to understand realpolitik

That particular group would have voted for Trump over Abraham Lincoln. Clinton lost part of the middle that she needed; evangelicals couldn't see the middle with a telescope.

If they had simply voted for the "lesser of two evils", they'd have dumped him as soon as Kavanaugh was sworn in.
 
They don't try. They, the Evangelicals, generally acknowledge they made a moral deal with the devil choice. Trump promised them things and as one put it, 'god works through people in mysterious ways'. That sums it up. They do not care he is morally bankrupt personally.
 
If they did not vote for Trump or not vote at all (forgot you Yanks do not have compulsory voting) then they are not complicit.
 
They voted anti-Clinton, not pro-Trump.
phands doesn't seem to understand realpolitik

Phands also never read the Bible. The Bible makes excuses for wiping out entire cities, allows foreigners to be enslaved indefinitely (the Chosen people have to be freed after a certain time), and includes instructions on the right and wrong way to beat your slaves to death.

Does anyone really think that Trump's treason, fascism, selfishness, wanton cruelty, etc. is in any way incompatible with Christianity, or that Christians would be embarrassed to be associated with someone as patently immoral as Trump?

For some reason, they do. They really expect that Christians would have a problem with supporting extreme immorality.

Does no one read history books anymore? If they couldn't be bothered to read the Bible, couldn't they at least read a history book? Any history book?
 
More demonstration of the hypocrisy of Christians who cla8im an absolute moral high ground we should all follow.

They should reject Trump without hesitation and equivication.
 
These scum deserve some good old testament revenge....except I don't condone violence. I'll settle for penury and disgrace....and the cessation of existence of their idiotic cults.

The second most appalling number from Election Night 2016 may have been the fact that approximately 80% of white evangelicals voted for Donald Trump (give or take a point). While it’s not surprising that conservative Christians voted for the Republican nominee, their support meant that they weren’t turned off by Trump’s rhetoric, his grabbing of women, his bigotry, his ignorance, his deception, or anything else that should have been disqualifying.




Trump has only gotten worse since the election. Despite giving evangelicals two Supreme Court justices (and counting) and plenty of other judges with lifetime appointments, he’s been everything his critics said he would be in terms of awfulness. That means evangelicals have to constantly defend their support for a disastrous president. After all, other than a handful of voices on FOX News, it’s not like pastors are bragging about Trump. They treat him like a necessary evil while simultaneously trying to paint themselves as above the drama, as if they’re not directly responsible for any of the horrible things he does.


But they are responsible. White evangelicals voted for him in a landslide and they continue to support him in roughly the same numbers. Even if some young evangelicals are distancing themselves from the faith and the GOP, most white evangelicals have no problem feeding Trump’s ego until he feeds them right back.


It doesn’t do Christianity any favors to say that out loud, though. That’s why we’re now seeing pushback from evangelical circles against the idea that they’re complicit in Trump’s atrocities.

https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com...their-complicity-in-donald-trumps-atrocities/

Can't it be explained by that Evangelicals want a black and white world. If it's not one it's got to be the other. Since Hillary murders babies in pizzerias = Donald Trump is a little angel
 
Why can't evangelicals choose the lesser of two evils?
If it's a perceived choice between Clinton (abortion/murder) and Trump (greed/lust) it's a no-brainer. https://www.crosswalk.com/blogs/christian-trends/should-you-vote-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils.html

That is called situational ethics. That is Trump. Christians can not claim a pure morality and violate it for political purposes and still claim a moral high ground. That is the Christian hypocrisy. It always has been.

Promenade Christians make a solemn vow before god in marriage, then divorce for a younger or wealthy new wife. No Christian response. Trump's many divorces should be repugnant to Christians.
 
Why can't evangelicals choose the lesser of two evils?
If it's a perceived choice between Clinton (abortion/murder) and Trump (greed/lust) it's a no-brainer. https://www.crosswalk.com/blogs/christian-trends/should-you-vote-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils.html

For the most part, I agree with the idea of choosing the lesser for two evils.
The problem with many Christians (especially the outspoken evangelical types) is that they are behaving hypocritically when it comes to Trump. In the past they have indicated that some moral misbehavior, on its own, should render a person as unsuitable to hold a political office. e.g. Bill Clinton's extramarital sexual activity.
Recently, it seems as though it's the godless Democrats who have been taking the high moral ground. e.g. Forcing out one of their stars (Al Franken), for groping women.
 
Back
Top Bottom