• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

WHY A RUSSIAN TERRORIST ATTACK COULD BE IMMINENT

 
 
 
Will Wiley

Will Wiley

Veteran Member
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
1,692
Location
Mincogan
Basic Beliefs
naturalist
WHY A RUSSIAN TERRORIST ATTACK COULD BE IMMINENT

Russia’s aggression has rapidly escalated over the past few years, and Putin is becoming an increasing threat to world peace. Since its hostile intervention in Syria, Russia has set up a no-fly zone over Syria, threatening to shoot down any American plane that flies over occupied air space. Russia has also been implicated by multiple accredited sources in the hacking of Democratic party servers and the series of cyber attacks that crippled America’s economy last week. After a series of escalating acts of aggression, top US national security experts are now concerned that Russia may be planning a devastating terrorist attack against US citizens.
Click to expand...

We need to be prepared for anything, as Russia continues to display total disregard for human rights and our national security. It’s time to take proactive steps to quell this aggression and stop Russia in their tracks. This may be our last chance to engage Russia in Kinetic military action before an all out war breaks out.
Click to expand...
 
WTF?

In what universe does engaging Russia in "kinetic military acrtion" not lead directly to "all out war?" Do you think you can dirctly attack Russian troops or resources and NOT provoke a war? Why do you suppose Putin would be cowed by "kinetic military action" anyway?
 
What zorq said.
WTF? "Let's attack them before they attack us, so we don't get in a big fucking war."

Or did you have some other "proactive step" in mind? Maybe... whine a lot?
 
If Russia was responsible to the IoT camera DDOS, then it is already a terrorist attack.
 
accreditedtimes.com is a joke site, of the kind that are nowadays usually (incorrectly) called 'satire'.

Taking this kind of site seriously without some kind of independent corroboration from outside the echo chamber of wild-eyed conspiracy theorists is the sure sign of a person who wants to believe, far more than they want to be informed.

It should be given no credence whatsoever - it is just pulled directly from the author's backside and presented online for no apparent purpose other then his delight in trolling the gullible.
 
Here's a similar story about Russian aggression except with names and stuff. While there's little threat from the Russian Navy. They'll be lucky to make it back home under their own power. Relations are looking rather bleak. NATO is answering the Trump call for having more skin in the game. It's was all you baby. Makes sure your peeps know it. For as little respect Putin may have for US leadership, I think he may have even less for NATO.
 
Will Wiley said:
WHY A RUSSIAN TERRORIST ATTACK COULD BE IMMINENT



We need to be prepared for anything, as Russia continues to display total disregard for human rights and our national security. It’s time to take proactive steps to quell this aggression and stop Russia in their tracks. This may be our last chance to engage Russia in Kinetic military action before an all out war breaks out.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

The US is the one who started this conflict. Russia's hostile intervention against ISIS is logical given the danger it poses to worldwide security and the fact that the US did very little against it at the time.
Assad is the least bad of the evils in that country.
There is zero evidence that Russia is planning to attack US civilians.

This has nothing to do with US National security as the US wants to bomb the Syrian government when it should do more to remove a ISIS which is the real problem.
Russia is flawed in its human rights policies but then so is the USA given the deaths in the Oil for Food program, and also the ongoing destruction in Libya.
 
whichphilosophy said:
Will Wiley said:
WHY A RUSSIAN TERRORIST ATTACK COULD BE IMMINENT
Click to expand...

The US is the one who started this conflict. Russia's hostile intervention against ISIS is logical given the danger it poses to worldwide security and the fact that the US did very little against it at the time.
Assad is the least bad of the evils in that country.
There is zero evidence that Russia is planning to attack US civilians.

This has nothing to do with US National security as the US wants to bomb the Syrian government when it should do more to remove a ISIS which is the real problem.
Russia is flawed in its human rights policies but then so is the USA given the deaths in the Oil for Food program, and also the ongoing destruction in Libya.
Click to expand...
Great argument, except that ISIS is not operating in Aleppo. Russia and Assad are doing hardly anything for ISIS, because their goal is to remove all the moderate (and not-so-moderate) rebels. That way Assad remains to only alternative to ISIS.
 
Jason Harvestdancer said:
The people aren't afraid enough, we need more bogeymen. ISIS isn't doing a sufficient job in scaring people.
Click to expand...

Yup. The alt-right is asleep at the wheel. There's only so much ISIS can do - after that, it's up to their fearmongering allies on the extreme right.
 
whichphilosophy said:
Will Wiley said:
WHY A RUSSIAN TERRORIST ATTACK COULD BE IMMINENT
Click to expand...

The US is the one who started this conflict. Russia's hostile intervention against ISIS is logical given the danger it poses to worldwide security and the fact that the US did very little against it at the time.
Assad is the least bad of the evils in that country.
There is zero evidence that Russia is planning to attack US civilians.

This has nothing to do with US National security as the US wants to bomb the Syrian government when it should do more to remove a ISIS which is the real problem.
Russia is flawed in its human rights policies but then so is the USA given the deaths in the Oil for Food program, and also the ongoing destruction in Libya.
Click to expand...

It's not a big news flash that US invasion of Iraq was a bad idea. However, the arab civil war started before the US was even formed! Therefore, I don't think that it's fair to blame everything on the US.
 
Jayjay said:
whichphilosophy said:
The US is the one who started this conflict. Russia's hostile intervention against ISIS is logical given the danger it poses to worldwide security and the fact that the US did very little against it at the time.
Assad is the least bad of the evils in that country.
There is zero evidence that Russia is planning to attack US civilians.

This has nothing to do with US National security as the US wants to bomb the Syrian government when it should do more to remove a ISIS which is the real problem.
Russia is flawed in its human rights policies but then so is the USA given the deaths in the Oil for Food program, and also the ongoing destruction in Libya.
Click to expand...
Great argument, except that ISIS is not operating in Aleppo. Russia and Assad are doing hardly anything for ISIS, because their goal is to remove all the moderate (and not-so-moderate) rebels. That way Assad remains to only alternative to ISIS.
Click to expand...
Yes, ISIS is not operating in Aleppo, Al Qaeda is. And we all know that Al Qaeda is the best thing which happened to Aleppo, some great guys.
 
barbos said:
bilby said:
accreditedtimes.com is a joke site, of the kind that are nowadays usually (incorrectly) called 'satire'.
Click to expand...
I am not sure authors intend it as joke/satire. Weird site.
Click to expand...

I think enough of the site comments help give it away, like this one below. I wondered as well after thinking further about Wiley's previous obtuse linked article from this site. The author definitely doesn't do it in the Onion's over the top style, which still manages to occasionally capture a non-thinking fool.
https://accredited-times.com/about/
Why two reasons:

1) Here you find an echo chamber for idiots and

2) satire for those who can recognize it. Not everyone can:

“People who don’t understand sarcasm are immediately noticed. They’re not getting it. They’re not socially adept.”

“The Science of Sarcasm”
Read more at Smithsonian Mag: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/scien...sarcasm-yeah-right-25038/#6PFhAwvzkXgbzLRS.99
Click to expand...
 
Elixir said:
Jason Harvestdancer said:
The people aren't afraid enough, we need more bogeymen. ISIS isn't doing a sufficient job in scaring people.
Click to expand...

Yup. The alt-right is asleep at the wheel. There's only so much ISIS can do - after that, it's up to their fearmongering allies on the extreme right.
Click to expand...

You think all the major fearmongers are on the right?

Haven't you been watching who the Democrats have nominated for their presidential candidate?
 
Jason Harvestdancer said:
Elixir said:
Yup. The alt-right is asleep at the wheel. There's only so much ISIS can do - after that, it's up to their fearmongering allies on the extreme right.
Click to expand...

You think all the major fearmongers are on the right?

Haven't you been watching who the Democrats have nominated for their presidential candidate?
Click to expand...

Yeah - Hillary and more than half of the rest of the country are espousing fear of a Trump presidency, while paying lip service to those who have fallen victim to the Alt-Right terror propaganda.

Have you noticed how Trump surrogates respond to policy questions? (Hint: they DON'T) You can ask them "exactly HOW do you plan to revitalize the coal industry?" or "how will cutting taxes on the rich benefit the middle class?" or "why is global warming not a concern?" and the answer is always the same (turn the volume up to 11):
"EMAILSBENGHAZIOBAMACAREISIS! EMAILSBENGHAZIOBAMACAREISIS! EMAILSBENGHAZIOBAMACAREISIS!" (repeat ad nauseum, shouting down anyone trying to point out that you didn't address the question)

Clowns, just like their fat spoiled caricature of a candidate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom