if you use your brain then you will see wisdom in what i am saying"Why? Because I say so. No evidence, I just want you to believe it because I say so."
Syed, you're unbelievable. No, really!
i dont have an answer that how did god became god but we do know that living creatures on earth MUST have creator because we dont other answer for their existenceyou believe living thing dont need a creator so why you believe god need a creator?
there are thing in the universe are uncreated and god is one of them
all i said is MY imagination
The argument being presented is a consistent one: "If living things must be created, and God is a living thing...why does the rule not apply to all living things?"
.
i dont have an answer that how did god became god
i dont have an answer that how did god became god
Infinite regress and logical impossibility of something that doesn't exist to begin with.
"I don't know => therefore, god exists!"
I admire your honesty.
It's been offered to you a couple of times.can you explain to me that how dead earth gave birth to life on earth?
Can you explain to me how you know this? If living things must be created, and God is a living thing...why does the rule not apply to all living things?
you believe living thing dont need a creator so why you believe god need a creator?
there are thing in the universe are uncreated and god is one of them
all i said is MY imagination
you believe living thing dont need a creator so why you believe god need a creator?
there are thing in the universe are uncreated and god is one of them
all i said is MY imagination
That's begging the question. If all living things require a Creator, and the Creator is a living thing. Going by the given rule, the Creator (being a living thing, also requires a Creator.
If you turn around and break your own rule by excluding the creator from your rules, I can simply state: life does not require a creator because life/DNA/cells are self organizing.
Which is what the evidence shows, living organisms are self organizing, self assembling bundles of information. There is no apparent Creator putting all the bits and pieces together.
so could you say earth created living creature? and earth is a creator?
so could you say earth created living creature? and earth is a creator?
No we can't. By your rules the Earth (being alive) would require a Creator, the solar system (being alive)would require a Creator and the Universe (being alive) would require a Creator, so given the progression of your rules and conditions, the Creator of All must require a Creator, Who requires a Creator (Creators all the way down). But you arbitrarily break your own rule at the point of ''God the Creator'' (mark one) because that happens to suits your needs.
No we can't. By your rules the Earth (being alive) would require a Creator, the solar system (being alive)would require a Creator and the Universe (being alive) would require a Creator, so given the progression of your rules and conditions, the Creator of All must require a Creator, Who requires a Creator (Creators all the way down). But you arbitrarily break your own rule at the point of ''God the Creator'' (mark one) because that happens to suits your needs.
then tell me who is ultimately responsible for living creatures on earth?
No we can't. By your rules the Earth (being alive) would require a Creator, the solar system (being alive)would require a Creator and the Universe (being alive) would require a Creator, so given the progression of your rules and conditions, the Creator of All must require a Creator, Who requires a Creator (Creators all the way down). But you arbitrarily break your own rule at the point of ''God the Creator'' (mark one) because that happens to suits your needs.
then tell me who is ultimately responsible for living creatures on earth?
No we can't. By your rules the Earth (being alive) would require a Creator, the solar system (being alive)would require a Creator and the Universe (being alive) would require a Creator, so given the progression of your rules and conditions, the Creator of All must require a Creator, Who requires a Creator (Creators all the way down). But you arbitrarily break your own rule at the point of ''God the Creator'' (mark one) because that happens to suits your needs.
then tell me who is ultimately responsible for living creatures on earth?
then tell me who is ultimately responsible for living creatures on earth?
Nobody is.
OKthen tell me who is ultimately responsible for living creatures on earth?
Your question is invalid. First you have to establish that a "who" is necessary for there to be life on Earth; only then can you reasonably ask about the identity of that "who".
Nobody is.
maybe you dont understand my question
let say god does not exist, now question is
who/ what ultimately responsible for living creatures on earth?
you dont know what cause life on earth?then tell me who is ultimately responsible for living creatures on earth?
This is kind of god of the gaps.
Syed, picture yourself back a thousand years at the beach as the tide comes in. With the knowledge at the time who do you think made the tide come in and out? God?
maybe you dont understand my question
let say god does not exist, now question is
who/ what ultimately responsible for living creatures on earth?
How is that not me understanding your question? It's the end result of random and unguided processes.