DrZoidberg
Contributor
Non-skeptics would also have to be welcome here if it really is a Freethought forum.
When I joined this forum it was called "Internet Infidels" and was clearly a Skeptics forum. I'm assuming that the same applies?
I'd also question the semantics of your statement. What in that case would be the difference between "free thought" and "no thought"? A mind that wanders aimlessly about with no shape or form isn't really free. Free implies that it is empowered somehow.
I avoid talking to non-skeptics because it's pointless. It would be like talking to Trump. Every fact is an alt fact. Everybody's version of reality has to be respected for no reason. No thank you. My limited time on this Earth is too valuable for me.
- - - Updated - - -
Non-skeptics would also have to be welcome here if it really is a Freethought forum.
You're here.
People examining the evidence and reaching a different conclusion than you isn't evidence of them not being skeptics. It's evidence of a disagreement.