I'm not big on taking substack without unhealthy amounts of salt.
RawStory has it, but I find them to be a bit on the edge as well.
If this were true, it'd be extremely disturbing. My problem in taking this too seriously is I wouldn't expect such an attitude to go too deep down the command chain. Hegseth hasn't been able to infect it that quickly, I wouldn't think. I'll wait till a bigger outlet can report on this with verification.
Agreed. I've tried to find this on any news source that has some mainstream credibility, and haven't. All it has is a surface resemblance to WarMan Hegseth's creepy faith life.
So -- show me the details. See how easy it is not to jump on the disinformation choo-choo, righties?
I think the issue is the following: There is a single secondary source which alleges it obtained information from some 110 primary sources, eyewitnesses and ear witnesses to the events of the commanding officers. No primary source is listed, no commanding officer's name is listed and so it cannot be verified. In their defense, suppose it is true, what would be the reason for not showing names? It could be fear of losing one's job which is a very real thing right now. Getting booted from the military with a dishonorable discharge will ruin one's life.
Here is Military.com on it:
A Pentagon spokesperson, when asked about the complaints and the ties to the ongoing mission in the Middle East, did not directly respond to the question. Instead, they referred
Military.com to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s remarks made Monday about the United States’ intentions.
The complaints remain anonymous due to fear of retribution by the Defense Department.
Now that said, I am open to it being real or fake. Let's suppose it is fake. Then, I'd expect the secondary source organization to have a bad reputation. OR no reputation at all due to it springing up from nowhere. Here is info on the organization:
en.wikipedia.org
It's actually reputable. Therefore, I am inclined to believe the story is likely true, but not definitely true.