So you are only 3 of 5 for popular vote?
You mean the political establishment that largely re-elected? I find it funny how people say people were against the establishment, yet Trump seemed to be the only anti-establishment candidate that won.
Ignorance, spite, naivety?
You misspelled, "He took advantage of 30 years of anti-Hillary Clinton propaganda".
Yeah, but MAGA is still better than "I'm with her" (talk about failed campaign wonks)
Depends on the vision: "Now, dicks have drive and clarity of vision, but they are not clever. They smell pussy and they want a piece of the action. And you thought you smelled some good old pussy, and have brought your two little mincey faggot balls along for a good old time." -- Snatch
I heard much of the same from the right when I predicted Obama would get the nomination and win the general election in '08 and '12. All sides have their axes to grind.
I don't really care about the politics of the speech, I am just mainly concerned with how it is delivered.
I was ignored when I told haters on the right that you better cool it down and focus on Obama's major political chops, because he's going to run over you with health care. Now, Trump is more of a mystery to me in the legislation process, because he lies much greater than most politicians, but I think he honestly doesn't want a replacement for Obamacare.
Yes, that should normally be the case, yet the average American voter does not have to follow the logical route to still be quite able of making a selection on the ballot.
Seriously? He literally said he'd sign "anything". He wants cameras taking his picture while holding up a piece of paper with his absurd signature written with a large tipped sharpie pen. I would say 'He doesn't give a shit about health care', but he certainly wants to look like a master broker of deals and sign a major piece of legislation.
It was delivered via the equivalent of a jerking off motion.
Yup! Though I first read "master borker" instead of "master broker"...was funnier that way.
Of course that was a major cause of his success, with his base. But his base is extremely misinformed.
I think he wants Republicans to blame while having his own tiny hands off of a bad health care bill.
Of course it is supposed to appear that he wants something like this, but as I've said, he is such a morbid liar.
Agreed, but he definitely does not want to be chained to a lousy bill. Now, lousy being, including his own personal terms. After all, he still has some genuine pride mixed in with his soaring arrogance.
