Zimmerman in the news, part infinity

[Derec]

I suspect the "debt" is actually what he 'owes on paper' to his various attorneys, a debt none of them actually expect to ever collect but conveniently allows the thug murderer to have his own pity party and raise money from some of the jackasses still defending him in spite of all these years of his violence.

Can one defend Z with respect to self defense against St. Trayvon while still acknowledging that he is an idiot in many of his other dealings? And can one acknowledge he is an idiot while still enjoying the triggering effect he has on the alt-Left?

 

[Arctish]

I suspect the "debt" is actually what he 'owes on paper' to his various attorneys, a debt none of them actually expect to ever collect but conveniently allows the thug murderer to have his own pity party and raise money from some of the jackasses still defending him in spite of all these years of his violence.

Can one defend Z with respect to self defense against St. Trayvon while still acknowledging that he is an idiot in many of his other dealings?

Perhaps, but you'll have to present a reasonable and coherent argument why he didn't follow his usual idiot pattern when he met up with Martin, not just assert it.

And can one acknowledge he is an idiot while still enjoying the triggering effect he has on the alt-Left?

Not in my experience. I've been acknowledging he's an idiot for years and all that does is trigger the Zimmerman fanboys, which isn't as much fun as one might think.

 

[laughing dog]

And can one acknowledge he is an idiot while still enjoying the triggering effect he has on the alt-Left?

I suppose so if one has no life at all.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

And can one acknowledge he is an idiot while still enjoying the triggering effect he has on the alt-Left?

I think there are idiots and then there are idiots. Two kinds.

The first kind is like Trump. OMG, what did that idiot tweet today? He's so dumb. He writes right from the emotional part of his brain without a filter.

And then there's the kind of idiots that are your friends and you call them on it and even joke about it. Ranking on each other might even be a thing. And laughing.

The latter is you and Zimmerman. You guys are laughing at people running over BLMs, about him pranking everyone over selling the gun and paintings. You'd be BFFs, if he gave you the time of day.

 

[Toni]

And can one acknowledge he is an idiot while still enjoying the triggering effect he has on the alt-Left?

I think there are idiots and then there are idiots. Two kinds.

The first kind is like Trump. OMG, what did that idiot tweet today? He's so dumb. He writes right from the emotional part of his brain without a filter.

And then there's the kind of idiots that are your friends and you call them on it and even joke about it. Ranking on each other might even be a thing. And laughing.

The latter is you and Zimmerman. You guys are laughing at people running over BLMs, about him pranking everyone over selling the gun and paintings. You'd be BFFs, if he gave you the time of day.

I think those are the same kind of idiots. Only real difference is that Trump is a sitting POTUS and grew up with access to money, etc. I think that Trump is the epitome of all that Derec and Zimmerman and their ilk hope and aspire to be.

I actually never thought of it before, until your post.

 

[Derec]

And can one acknowledge he is an idiot while still enjoying the triggering effect he has on the alt-Left?

I suppose so if one has no life at all.

Says a guy with over 50,000 posts on an internet forum.

 

[Derec]

The latter is you and Zimmerman.

Bullshit.

You guys are laughing at people running over BLMs,

I think people who block highways for political protest are scum, regardless of their politics. Left-wingers protesting about police killing thugs who attack them, right-wingers protesting abortion. Neither has the right to block highways. What does that have to do with Z? The Trayvn-Z protesters were rather well-behaved, compared with Ferguson and later #BLM riots.

 

[Toni]

And can one acknowledge he is an idiot while still enjoying the triggering effect he has on the alt-Left?

I suppose so if one has no life at all.

Says a guy with almost 100,000 posts on an internet forum.

Writes a guy with apparently piss poor arithmetic skills.

 

[Derec]

Perhaps, but you'll have to present a reasonable and coherent argument why he didn't follow his usual idiot pattern when he met up with Martin, not just assert it.

One can be an idiot and still be attacked. As to "coherent argument", go back to the original "Dying for Skittles" thread where the evidence was endlessly debated. In a nutshell, there is evidence Trayvon was giving Z a beat-down and Z defended himself before he got injured worse.

Not in my experience. I've been acknowledging he's an idiot for years and all that does is trigger the Zimmerman fanboys, which isn't as much fun as one might think.

From my experience on here, the triggered ones are the Trayvon fanboys. I do not think there are any Z fanboys here at all.

 

[Toni]

And can one acknowledge he is an idiot while still enjoying the triggering effect he has on the alt-Left?

I suppose so if one has no life at all.

Says a guy with over 50,000 posts on an internet forum.

Good edit!

 

[Derec]

Writes a guy with apparently piss poor arithmetic skills.

Not arithmetic skills. I merely forgot the software already added the two together and thus I added the last two lines of his post count quickly without really looking.

But thanks for the cheap shot. I expected nothing else from a Trayvon fangirl.

- - - Updated - - -

Good edit!

Unlike some on here, I acknowledge when I make a mistake.

 

[Toni]

Writes a guy with apparently piss poor arithmetic skills.

Not arithmetic skills. I merely forgot the software already added the two together and thus I added the last two lines of his post count quickly without really looking.

But thanks for the cheap shot. I expected nothing else from a Trayvon fangirl.

- - - Updated - - -

Good edit!

Unlike some on here, I acknowledge when I make a mistake.

I think you do a lot of things without really looking or thinking about them much, Derec. Everybody does now and then but some people, more than others.

I also think you think and do and write a lot of things without much actual knowledge, experience, and most importantly, empathy. Which is a shame. I don't think you are stupid or without feeling or worth. Sadly, there are huge swaths of people that you do not afford a similar opinion towards. And it really limits you.

 

[Derec]

I think you do a lot of things without really looking or thinking about them much, Derec. Everybody does now and then but some people, more than others.

I looked at a wrong line, give me a break! I tend to look and think about things a lot more than people on here who instinctively back the position that is politically correct or in line with left-wing, so-called "progressive" orthodoxy, be it on Israel, Islam, #BLM, illegal aliens or even 70 year old lighthearted songs...

I also think you think and do and write a lot of things without much actual knowledge, experience, and most importantly, empathy. Which is a shame. I don't think you are stupid or without feeling or worth. Sadly, there are huge swaths of people that you do not afford a similar opinion towards. And it really limits you.

What really bugged me initially about the Trayvon case is how uncritical the media was in their portrayal of Trayvon as some sort of innocent victim. They used old photos of Trayvon which led people in the original thread to believe that he was 13. They uncritically parroted every bit of propaganda fed to them by family shyster Crump. And so on.

Unlike you, I believe both Trayvon and Z made mistakes that night. You, however, keep insisting that "Trayvon did nothing wrong, not a thing". And that really limits you.

 

[Toni]

I think you do a lot of things without really looking or thinking about them much, Derec. Everybody does now and then but some people, more than others.

I looked at a wrong line, give me a break! I tend to look and think about things a lot more than people on here who instinctively back the position that is politically correct or in line with left-wing, so-called "progressive" orthodoxy, be it on Israel, Islam, #BLM, illegal aliens or even 70 year old lighthearted songs...

I also think you think and do and write a lot of things without much actual knowledge, experience, and most importantly, empathy. Which is a shame. I don't think you are stupid or without feeling or worth. Sadly, there are huge swaths of people that you do not afford a similar opinion towards. And it really limits you.

What really bugged me initially about the Trayvon case is how uncritical the media was in their portrayal of Trayvon as some sort of innocent victim. They used old photos of Trayvon which led people in the original thread to believe that he was 13. They uncritically parroted every bit of propaganda fed to them by family shyster Crump. And so on.

Unlike you, I believe both Trayvon and Z made mistakes that night. You, however, keep insisting that "Trayvon did nothing wrong, not a thing". And that really limits you.

I wasn't necessarily thinking about this thread when I wrote what I did, Derec. I've given you a lot of breaks and am actually trying to give you a break here, as well.

I never once thought that Trayvon Martin was 13 when he was murdered.

I am sure that Martin 'made mistakes' seeing that he was unable to avoid the man who stalked him while Martin made his way home that night. However, any 'mistakes' that he made pale in comparison with shooting an unarmed teenager that you were stalking, as Zimmerman did.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

I think you do a lot of things without really looking or thinking about them much, Derec. Everybody does now and then but some people, more than others.

I looked at a wrong line, give me a break! I tend to look and think about things a lot more than people on here who instinctively back the position that is politically correct or in line with left-wing, so-called "progressive" orthodoxy, be it on Israel, Islam, #BLM, illegal aliens or even 70 year old lighthearted songs...

I also think you think and do and write a lot of things without much actual knowledge, experience, and most importantly, empathy. Which is a shame. I don't think you are stupid or without feeling or worth. Sadly, there are huge swaths of people that you do not afford a similar opinion towards. And it really limits you.

What really bugged me initially about the Trayvon case is how uncritical the media was in their portrayal of Trayvon as some sort of innocent victim. They used old photos of Trayvon which led people in the original thread to believe that he was 13. They uncritically parroted every bit of propaganda fed to them by family shyster Crump. And so on.

Unlike you, I believe both Trayvon and Z made mistakes that night. You, however, keep insisting that "Trayvon did nothing wrong, not a thing". And that really limits you.

Drama. Drama. Drama.

I don't even remember what the reason for thread resurrect was anymore.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I looked at a wrong line, give me a break! I tend to look and think about things a lot more than people on here who instinctively back the position that is politically correct or in line with left-wing, so-called "progressive" orthodoxy, be it on Israel, Islam, #BLM, illegal aliens or even 70 year old lighthearted songs...


What really bugged me initially about the Trayvon case is how uncritical the media was in their portrayal of Trayvon as some sort of innocent victim. They used old photos of Trayvon which led people in the original thread to believe that he was 13. They uncritically parroted every bit of propaganda fed to them by family shyster Crump. And so on.

Unlike you, I believe both Trayvon and Z made mistakes that night. You, however, keep insisting that "Trayvon did nothing wrong, not a thing". And that really limits you.

Drama. Drama. Drama.

I don't even remember what the reason for thread resurrect was anymore.

Derec is angry.

 

[Derec]

Derec is angry.

Not at all. Just bemused at people still angry at Z.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Unlike you, I believe both Trayvon and Z made mistakes that night. You, however, keep insisting that "Trayvon did nothing wrong, not a thing". And that really limits you.

I'm curious, what mistakes do you think Zimmerman made that night?

 

[RavenSky]

I suspect the "debt" is actually what he 'owes on paper' to his various attorneys, a debt none of them actually expect to ever collect but conveniently allows the thug murderer to have his own pity party and raise money from some of the jackasses still defending him in spite of all these years of his violence.

Can one defend Z with respect to self defense against St. Trayvon while still acknowledging that he is an idiot in many of his other dealings? And can one acknowledge he is an idiot while still enjoying the triggering effect he has on the alt-Left?

The fucking violent thug George Zimmerman is the murderer of Trayvon Martin, so no... you can NOT claim "self-defense" for that thug Zimmerman and still claim to have any sort of rational thought about anything else on the topic of Zimmerman.

Bye bye

- - - Updated - - -

And can one acknowledge he is an idiot while still enjoying the triggering effect he has on the alt-Left?

Not in my experience. I've been acknowledging he's an idiot for years and all that does is trigger the Zimmerman fanboys, which isn't as much fun as one might think.

That!

 

[Elixir]

Can one defend Z with respect to self defense against St. Trayvon

What an idiotic question. Sure, "one" can do that, if "one" has their head far enough up their ass to believe that Trayvon posed an immediate physical threat to St. Z.