Artemus
Veteran Member
Sounds like they were setting her up to be the fall guy.
Everyone working for Trump is being set up to be the fall guy at some point. I truly don't understand how is able to hire anyone at this point.
Sounds like they were setting her up to be the fall guy.
Money talks, if you get paid I guess. There's always a book deal. And there's the stupid.Sounds like they were setting her up to be the fall guy.
Everyone working for Trump is being set up to be the fall guy at some point. I truly don't understand how is able to hire anyone at this point.
So... They admit he stole the documents, accuse national records of "losing" documents that "must have" existed which "prove" Obama did... Something, lie about how and where the illegally stolen documents were stored, and then stumps for unilateral process-free declassification.
I'm just looking forward to the upcoming visit to Trump Tower NY
Federal prosecutors examining Donald Trump’s unauthorized retention of highly sensitive government documents at his Mar-a-Lago property will obtain testimony from top adviser Kash Patel after granting him limited immunity from prosecution, according to two sources familiar with the matter.
The immunity – a powerful tool that forces witnesses to testify on the promise that they will not be prosecuted for their statements or information derived from their statements – takes effect on 2 November and signals the importance of his testimony to the criminal investigation.
The justice department’s interest with Patel centers on his claims that the documents found at Mar-a-Lago were declassified, how the documents came to end up at the property, and how Trump’s aides and lawyers responded to requests for their return, the sources said.
The status of the documents is important because if prosecutors can prove that those seized by the FBI in August were not declassified, it could strengthen a potential obstruction case contending that Trump used the claims as an excuse for why he did not return records that had been subpoenaed.
The former US president kept in the desk drawer of his office at the Mar-a-Lago property one document marked “secret” and one marked “confidential” alongside three communications from a book author, a religious leader and a pollster, dated after he departed the White House.
The mixed records could amount to evidence that Trump wilfully retained documents marked classified when he was no longer president as the justice department investigates unauthorised possession of national security materials, concealment of government records, and obstruction.
Why isn't this guy in Leavenworth?Court files show evidence Trump handled records marked classified after presidency
Justice department filing claims former US president kept secret documents in drawer at Mar-a-Lago with other files from after his time in officewww.theguardian.comThe former US president kept in the desk drawer of his office at the Mar-a-Lago property one document marked “secret” and one marked “confidential” alongside three communications from a book author, a religious leader and a pollster, dated after he departed the White House.
The mixed records could amount to evidence that Trump wilfully retained documents marked classified when he was no longer president as the justice department investigates unauthorised possession of national security materials, concealment of government records, and obstruction.
In considering these arguments, we are faced with a choice: apply our usual test; drastically expand the availability of equitable jurisdiction for every subject of a search warrant; or carve out an unprecedented exception in our law for former presidents. We choose the first option. So the case must be dismissed.
not really... not much, at least... it blocked the examination of like 200 out of 10,000 pages (or documents)... they were trucking on with 99% of the case this whole time, as I understand it. Yes, it did cause some degree of delay, but not what he wanted (which was for it to last beyond 2024 campaign timeframe)Judge Cannon’s ruling was to buy Trump time to delay the DOJ investigation. It worked.
not really... not much, at least... it blocked the examination of like 200 out of 10,000 pages (or documents)... they were trucking on with 99% of the case this whole time, as I understand it. Yes, it did cause some degree of delay, but not what he wanted (which was for it to last beyond 2024 campaign timeframe)Judge Cannon’s ruling was to buy Trump time to delay the DOJ investigation. It worked.