- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Messages
- 11,239
- Location
- Midwestern USA
- Gender
- Faggot
- Basic Beliefs
- Agnostic deist
What you were responding to is completely irrelevant to the fact that your claim "What got attention was..." is, in fact, untrue.So, you suceeeded in stopping the invasion of Iraq, then?Back when a married couple and I were spearheading a Stop the War effort, in the lead up to the Iraq Invasion, she explained this. She had low level friends in the government, like intern level. They'd explained the priorities of contacting your representative.
E-mails mostly get ignored and deleted en masse. Form letters weren't treated very differently.
What got attention was a hand written, addressed, and stamped missive. That meant the constituent really cared about the issue.
They bought a big roll of stamps, I bought a batch of nice stationary with envelopes. We photocopied a list of points and addresses, and gave them to anyone who would agree to hand write, in their own words, and mail a letter to their congressman or whatever.
Or is this a detailed, step-by-step, set of instructions on how to be ignored while feeling as though you were less ignored than the other people they ignored?
Perhaps you didn't notice the part of the post I quoted and responded to?
Tomorrow
You contrasted your approach with other approaches, such as "E-mails", which "mostly get ignored and deleted en masse", and "Form letters", which you say "weren't treated very differently".
And yet, your alternative approach had exactly the same outcome that you deride for these other approaches.
You are promoting a mythical tale in which the moral you derive is not in any way consequent from the story you told.
No, we didn't stop The Invasion.
But whatever brilliant tactics you employed didn't stop Australia from joining Bush II's "coalition".
They were right in there pitching.
Tom