To Give You a Size of the Immense and Growing Size of Illegal Immigration

[ZiprHead]

OMG! Someone was wearing a hoodie with a naughty word on it! Which means it was a message for all Americans! It also proves they are a migrant... and lazy.

My sister has a T shirt she wears that says:
Fuck Fuck
Mother Fuck
Fuckity
Fuck Fuck

 

[Playball40]

At the end of the day, people want to emigrate to the US for a better way of life.

Which is one of our core values. Has been for centuries.

These modern people who want to destroy what made America Great by ending that makes me very angry.
Tom

I get where you're coming from on a philosophical level.

On the other hand... there's a very practical limit that needs to be considered. We already have a serious problem in the US with homelessness, inadequate incomes, cost of housing and food. We don't even have a sustainable and reasonable approach in place to take care of our actual citizens.

It sounds very compassionate and nice and caring to say "send us your hungry and your poor..." But that's all it is - sounds. The reality right now is that the US throwing open the gates to all of the hungry and poor who want to be here just results in the US having a lot more hungry and poor people.

The homeless/poor/hungry in this country are typically the elderly, disabled, mentally ill....not migrants wanting to work hard labor jobs. Two completely different issues.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

The homeless/poor/hungry in this country are typically the elderly, disabled, mentally ill....not migrants wanting to work hard labor jobs. Two completely different issues.

And note that "disabled" is not a binary condition. We have a serious flaw in our disability system in that it looks at whether they can do any job--with no regard for whether there is a sufficient supply of jobs they can do. And employers are going to hire the best candidates, not the marginal ones. There is a range that is not "disabled" but neither are they realistically able to get a job other than in times of very low unemployment--and in most cases not even then because they're out of date.

 

[RVonse]

At the end of the day, people want to emigrate to the US for a better way of life.

Which is one of our core values. Has been for centuries.

These modern people who want to destroy what made America Great by ending that makes me very angry.
Tom

I get where you're coming from on a philosophical level.

On the other hand... there's a very practical limit that needs to be considered. We already have a serious problem in the US with homelessness, inadequate incomes, cost of housing and food. We don't even have a sustainable and reasonable approach in place to take care of our actual citizens.

The reality is, the focus on the poor in the US will change 0% whether people are crossing our border or not. So, that is a red herring.

The US can be under the strain of poverty only when it really allows itself to be. Currently a bill in the Senate would have helped at least address funding at the border, for communities that definitely assistance. But otherwise, most of America couldn't even tell there is a border issue, if not for the tabloid news of Rupert Murdoch. There are viable solutions to managing immigration, but right now the liberal side's position is deal with it, and the conservative side's position is pretend we can just close the border and it'll go away... and just send them all back.

Ultra conservative Coulter is blaming Trump for not walking his talk building his wall. Blaming your own party sounds like accountability to me.

Then you've got lying Biden bullshitting no executive authority to do anything when he really does.....looks like you've got the pretending attributed to the wrong people Jimmy!

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Trump ordered his MAGA allies to stop the Sen. Lankford bill.

 

[RVonse]

Trump ordered his MAGA allies to stop the Sen. Lankford bill.

The actual reality is that Trump is not holding any office right now. He has no legitimate powers to take down any executive orders made by Biden. Those executive orders are the real problem and taking them down is the solution.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Trump ordered his MAGA allies to stop the Sen. Lankford bill.

The actual reality is that Trump is not holding any office right now.

Yet, he had the GOP trash the bill because it was not in his campaign's best interest. You can choose to ignore that reality, but it is about as clear as day as it gets.

He has no legitimate powers to take down any executive orders made by Biden. Those executive orders are the real problem and taking them down is the solution.

So what about the notably higher returns, expulsions under Biden we've seen? Higher than under Trump. Yes, there is higher volume causing it, but there is this peculiar idea that Biden is just letting everyone in.

 

[Shadowy Man]

Trump ordered his MAGA allies to stop the Sen. Lankford bill.

The actual reality is that Trump is not holding any office right now. He has no legitimate powers to take down any executive orders made by Biden. Those executive orders are the real problem and taking them down is the solution.

Specifically which executive orders do you recommend taking down to solve the issues at the border?

 

[RVonse]

Trump ordered his MAGA allies to stop the Sen. Lankford bill.

The actual reality is that Trump is not holding any office right now. He has no legitimate powers to take down any executive orders made by Biden. Those executive orders are the real problem and taking them down is the solution.

Specifically which executive orders do you recommend taking down to solve the issues at the border?

94 of them. See post 564 above.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Trump ordered his MAGA allies to stop the Sen. Lankford bill.

The actual reality is that Trump is not holding any office right now. He has no legitimate powers to take down any executive orders made by Biden. Those executive orders are the real problem and taking them down is the solution.

Specifically which executive orders do you recommend taking down to solve the issues at the border?

94 of them. See post 564 above.

specifically - in a way that is exact and clear; precisely

The above was not that. Give us just 10 of the specific EO's that need to be dealt with. I'm also curious why you agree with the other 410 or so executive actions by Biden.

Biden signed more executive orders related to immigration than any other topic on his first day in office. He’s taken more than 500 executive actions since then, already surpassing former president Donald Trump’s four-year total, according to a recent tally by the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute (MPI).

 

[Shadowy Man]

Trump ordered his MAGA allies to stop the Sen. Lankford bill.

The actual reality is that Trump is not holding any office right now. He has no legitimate powers to take down any executive orders made by Biden. Those executive orders are the real problem and taking them down is the solution.

Specifically which executive orders do you recommend taking down to solve the issues at the border?

94 of them. See post 564 above.

Post 564 does not delineate the 94 executive actions you propose be taken down. Can you point me to the list somewhere?

 

[Shadowy Man]

For example, this article states that Biden took 296 executive actions on immigration in his first year alone. Presumably, more have been taken since. So, which 94 are the ones that are crucial to solving the border crisis?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I think we need to wait for Musk to post another Xit before RVonse will know which ones.

 

[RVonse]

For example, this article states that Biden took 296 executive actions on immigration in his first year alone. Presumably, more have been taken since. So, which 94 are the ones that are crucial to solving the border crisis?

Considering how well the border crossing were during Trump vs Biden, you could simply take down all 296 and you would no doubt be better off.

 

[laughing dog]

For example, this article states that Biden took 296 executive actions on immigration in his first year alone. Presumably, more have been taken since. So, which 94 are the ones that are crucial to solving the border crisis?

Considering how well the border crossing were during Trump vs Biden, you could simply take down all 296 and you would no doubt be better off.

The border crossing were even better under LBJ when there was no wall.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

For example, this article states that Biden took 296 executive actions on immigration in his first year alone. Presumably, more have been taken since. So, which 94 are the ones that are crucial to solving the border crisis?

Considering how well the border crossing were during Trump vs Biden, you could simply take down all 296 and you would no doubt be better off.

So, you admittedly don't know what you are talking about. You just share Xits from people like Musk, and hope they know what they are talking about.

 

[TomC]

Trump ordered his MAGA allies to stop the Sen. Lankford bill.

The actual reality is that Trump is not holding any office right now. He has no legitimate powers to take down any executive orders made by Biden. Those executive orders are the real problem and taking them down is the solution.

Specifically which executive orders do you recommend taking down to solve the issues at the border?

94 of them. See post 564 above.

I just reread that post.
No mention of anything specific, just Coulter complaining about supporting a liar and Musk making up stuff and Xiting about it.
Tom

 

[Shadowy Man]

For example, this article states that Biden took 296 executive actions on immigration in his first year alone. Presumably, more have been taken since. So, which 94 are the ones that are crucial to solving the border crisis?

Considering how well the border crossing were during Trump vs Biden, you could simply take down all 296 and you would no doubt be better off.

So, the right thing to do is just assume that everything Biden has done with respect to immigration is wrong and remove everything without review? That's your approach to this issue? Is there any reason you can give why we should take anything you say on the subject seriously?

You said, and I quote, "94 of them". So, you must believe that that's the appropriate number of executive actions to take down. Or, will you admit that you were simply parroting Elon Musk?

 

[Ford]

For example, this article states that Biden took 296 executive actions on immigration in his first year alone. Presumably, more have been taken since. So, which 94 are the ones that are crucial to solving the border crisis?

Considering how well the border crossing were during Trump vs Biden, you could simply take down all 296 and you would no doubt be better off.

We've been over this already. Trump did not reduce illegal immigration.

By November 2020, the Trump administration reduced the number of green cards issued to people abroad by at least 418,453 and the number of non‐immigrant visas by at least 11,178,668 during his first term through November 2020. President Trump also entered the White House with the goal of eliminating illegal immigration but Trump oversaw a virtual collapse in interior immigration enforcement and the stabilization of the illegal immigrant population. Thus, Trump succeeded in reduce legal immigration and failed to eliminate illegal immigration.

 

[TSwizzle]

If you can't make it to the southern border, Just fill out the form on the app and Brandon will send a plane to get you.

Joe Biden's administration has admitted transporting migrants on secret flights into the U.S. and lawyers for its immigration agencies claim revealing the locations could create national security 'vulnerabilities'. Customs and Border Protection has refused to disclose information about a program last year secretly chartering flights for thousands of undocumented immigrants from foreign airports directly to U.S. cities.
It means that while record numbers of migrants were flowing over the southern border last year, the Biden White House was also directly transporting them into the country.

Daily Mail