I think ‘racially motivated’ is a more accurate description than simply 'gullible' or 'belligerently Ignorant.' After all, look at the policies MAGA voters consistently support, voter ID laws
What's racially motivated, or in any way wrong about voter ID laws? How difficult is it to get id really? Reminds me of this video.
and voter roll purges that disproportionately affect Black and Latino communities,
To the extent that purges of eligible voters happen, it is of course wrong, but it should not be lumped together with things like voter id, or race-neutral cleanups of voter rolls (such as removing anybody who has been inactive for years, regardless of race).
opposition to immigration policies that favor non-European countries,
Why should "non-European countries" be favored for immigration? Note you were not saying that these people support favoring European countries, but that they object to non-European countries being given a preference.
In general, I think one criterion, currently completely neglected, for immigration should be cultural compatibility. And most people from say Afghanistan or Somalia are not a good cultural fit. That does not mean that no people from those countries woudl be a good fit, but any prospective migrant should be vetted, and if a country has 98% support for Sharia Law, most people would rightly be rejected.
attacks on diversity programs in education and hiring,
People should not be given preferential treatment in education or hiring because of their race. The so-called "affirmative action" is so unpopular that a referendum to reinstate it failed even in California in 2020.
I could see people being given a small boost in admissions for individual circumstances, like low family income, but I do not see why the son of a black Coca-Cola vice president or the daughter of a V103 radio DJ should be given preferential treatment over, say, the son of a Chinese grocer or the daughter of a white coal miner.
and resistance to police reform even after nationally publicized killings of unarmed Black people.
First of all, "unarmed" does not mean that the suspect wasn't a threat. It does not mean that a shooting wasn't justified. See Michael Brown. And activists tend to claim that a perp was "unarmed" when they were armed with a replica firearm like for example Tyre King in Columbus or Quanice Hayes in Portland. Since there is no way to determine whether a gun is real or replica in real time, these people should be regarded as armed, not unarmed.
Lastly, what type of "reform"? I would not be averse to meaningful reforms that lead to better training of police officers. But this talk of "defunding police" or even
"abolishing police" is highly counterproductive. As are proposals to make policing more difficult, like making it easier to sue or prosecute police in edge cases. Police should be judged based on the situation at the time, and given the fact that they have to react in real time (also considering the finite time to process any threat, and the delay in motor cortex processing and impulses travelling down motor neurons to the hand muscles), and do not have the luxury to review footage frame by frame before making the decision to fire or not to fire. Also, some cities have banned police from conducting certain traffic stops. That makes traffic more dangerous, but it also means that fewer serious people will be caught. For example, Timothy McVeigh was caught during a routine traffic stop.
These aren’t random accidents of ignorance, they’re patterns that almost always end up hurting communities of color the most.
They usually are, for example when the "prince of Brooklyn Center" Daunte Wright got shot, it was because the officer accidentally mistook her gun for her taser. Now, the reason why these things happen more often with communities of certain color more is because they commit, per capita, more violent crime. Blacks commit ~6x more homicides and robberies than whites, according to
FBI data, as well as 2x as many rapes, aggravated assaults and theft offenses. That's why they interact more with the police, on a per-capita basis, and obviously there is more opportunity to get shot and killed, whether justified or not.
They are only 'belligerently ignorant' to the fact that it harms them as well.
Everybody can be harmed by police being inadequately trained, or by wrong people being hired. But also, everybody is harmed, including "communities of color" when police are hampered in their work becuase of racial politics. Or even when police do their work, but the other parts of the criminal justice system let the perps walk over and over again, as is happening in New York.
Serial NYC shoplifter waltzes free despite staggering 254 arrests
NY bail deform has proven to be a colossal failure.