An absolute delight to watch, a historical true crime whodunnit small in scope but big in feeling. The whodunnit part is revealed about halfway through, but that just kicks up the pathos as it remains unclear who will get pinned for the crime. Olivia Colman shines throughout.
I liked it except I kept rooting for Tom Cruise's son to get blown up real good. That character is unlikeable from start to finish. When it looked like he got killed it was a relief; now we can get on with the rest of the movie without being irritated. Then he comes back and the undertone of annoyance starts all over again.
There were a number of good disaster movies in the 1970s (and probably some other decades) that were good. This is because they concentrated on the disaster itself and the characters, as primary aspects.
But WOTW 2005, like other disaster movies of that time such as The Day After Tomorrow (2004), and some others since, have set aside telling a story of the disaster and its effects on people, to prioritize family drama.
I liked it except I kept rooting for Tom Cruise's son to get blown up real good. That character is unlikeable from start to finish. When it looked like he got killed it was a relief; now we can get on with the rest of the movie without being irritated. Then he comes back and the undertone of annoyance starts all over again.
There were a number of good disaster movies in the 1970s (and probably some other decades) that were good. This is because they concentrated on the disaster itself and the characters, as primary aspects.
It's about a small tribe of 5 or 6 stone age hunter gatherers and one woman they refer to as "The Stray," who they picked up along the way although the movie doesn't elaborate on it. The leader leads them across the sea to what looks like a nordic country just prior to winter. It may be the UK because the film was shot in Scotland.
After arriving at the place the leader had promised would be a bounty of easily harvested animals, it turns out the place is desolate. The fact that he's doomed them is only said by the elder when it's too late. The film does a good job of showing that everyone knows the leader ahys doomed them, but they don't say it, ever after the elder says it.
The first two acts are excellent. They show how brutal it was to survive and the cold ruthlessness to do so. Oh, one other really interesting thing is that the actors they chose. They don't look European, but somewhere between Mediterranean on the way to caucasian with some north African heritage as well. Nice touch.
In the third act, the movie goes completely to hell. What is obviously a monster steals the leader's beloved and highly valued son. The monster then goes about taking one at a time, not just tearing them apart, but smashing them into blobs of goo-flesh. Surely the reveal would be cool.
It isn't.
Turns out it was a couple of neanderthals. My understanding is that neanderthals were stronger than homosapiens, so the idea of them being able to physically outmatch them is perfectly consistent with that. However, they weren't tigers with giant squid tentacles They aren't shown as tigers with giant tentacles, but their gory obliteration of the humans would make it seem so. That is until the one surviving human manages to physically beat them, which is grossly inconsistent with came before that scene. Then she find the leader's son beneath a pile of animal furs and he lets the surviving human know that the neanderthals were protecting him. Protecting him from what??? Whose fucking stupid ideas were these?
Anyway, this film had the opportunity to be one of the more interesting films on this subject, of which there are few. Had the filmmakers just let the audience know they were being stalked by
neanderthals
and physically overcome, it would've been manifold better. This might be the most disappointing 3rd act of any movie in recent memory.
Apparently this one was made in 2020, but released in 2025 like a fart in an elevator.
I'd read that it was bad, but because it was highlighted on one of my streaming services I decided to find out for myself.
This movie was cool for about the first 45 seconds or so. It has a high tech vibe wherein Ice Cube is staring at different computer screens, zooming in on various places because he works for the NSA (?). Then it turns out that his first priority while at work is spying on his kids. He even knows what his adult daughter has in her refrigerator, what she's doing at home, and where she is when she's out in public. This is supposed to come off as a sweet protective dad thing. That's in the first 2-3 minutes of the movie.
Whoever thought this element of the film wasn't psychopathic and creepy, bordering on incestuous is probably creepy and horny for someone in their own family.
I stuck with it though because I wanted to be an internet smart-ass and tell everyone that it wasn't that bad. This was a hopeless endeavor.
Ice Tea clicking, zooming in on different screens while watching news updates on computer screens as they occur in real time is the entire movie. You think that Ice Tea is going to quickly leave the office to go outside to be a participant violent alien shenanigans is going to happen, but nope. And what the fuck is up with American security agencies having to get information from TV news outlets??? Shouldn't they know more of what's going on than the local weather guy?
And why are the aliens here? Because they want to eat our data.
I hate myself just little bit more than I did for giving this movie an entire half hour. It's not good enough for Rifftrax because they'd have to make the same joke over and over.
War of the Worlds (2025)
With a Tomatometer rating of 3%, y'all thought there was a chance it might be good? Had to judge it for yourself, eh?
3%. Three fucking percent. Fucking hell. That's right up there with wondering if the bridge is really out.
War of the Worlds (2025)
With a Tomatometer rating of 3%, y'all thought there was a chance it might be good? Had to judge it for yourself, eh?
3%. Three fucking percent. Fucking hell. That's right up there with wondering if the bridge is really out.
Red Eye, 7/10; Stars Cillian Murphy and Rachel McAdams in a psychological thriller. On her way back to Florida from a funeral in Dallas Lisa meets a charming man called Jackson in the airport. He persuades her to join him in the airport restaurant for a drink. Later, as Lisa is about to take her seat on the plane, low and behold, there is Jackson in the seat next to hers! Seems innocent enough but it is actually part of a well planned conspiracy to assassinate a US government official who is going to be staying at the hotel Lisa manages. In order to assassinate the guy, he must be moved to a particular suite in the hotel. Jackson makes Lisa order the move by threatening to have her father killed if she does not cooperate. The plot works reasonably well and is not totally outside the realms of possibility. Towards the end it gets a little bit too much but it was definitely watchable.
If they had tried to avoid all the criticisms it would just have been criticised for going in the other direction. (And would have been a different film.) Original take on the concept of the musical and talks about some things that could stand some air.
The Mule. 7/10
Elderly Clint Eastwood as a taciturn and competent drug mule.
A Single Shot, 2/10; Stars Sam Rockwell in a thriller/mystery. The mystery is why this crap was made. It had potential but it was terrible. While out poaching, John accidentally shoots and kills a young woman. He hides the body but finds a lot of cash. He’s going through a divorce and his wife’s friend is involved with some ex con who in turn is friends with the guy whose girlfriend he shot. It’s also his money I think. Anyway, the story unfolds at an excruciatingly slow pace with no coherent connection between scenes. The ending is terrible, boring. Avoid this one.
Still trying to figure out if I liked it.
The acting was good. And the pace kept me interested.
I have a short attention span these days.
Will I fact check? Probably not.
Knowing how he was created helps a bit.
Not enough however. 7/10
Rebel Ridge, 4/10; Billed as an action thriller this two hour pile of shite fails to deliver much action. The movie is about police corruption in a small town where the police chief played by Don Johnson seizes money by way of "civil forfeiture". Police seize the main character's $30k of which $10k is to post bail for his cousin. What follows is mostly two hours of boredom. The movie has a load of "tense music" which becomes annoying real fast because nothing much happens in this borefest.
The Commitments, 8/10; A 1991 musical comedy available on Peacock. Based in Dublin the movie is about Jimmy Rabbitte an aspiring band manager who is putting together a soul band in a run down part of the city. He assembles a bunch musicians who can't play very well but he reckons with practice and his guiding hand could be successful. Lead by a pretty good singer, Deco, the band starts to improve and gets a few gigs. Friction in the band between members sees the whole thing unravel with some violence. A fun movie with a great soundtrack but there is a lot of cussing! Jimmy often narrates the movie as if he's being interviewed by Terry Wogan which is really quite funny.
The Commitments, 8/10; A 1991 musical comedy available on Peacock. Based in Dublin the movie is about Jimmy Rabbitte an aspiring band manager who is putting together a soul band in a run down part of the city. He assembles a bunch musicians who can't play very well but he reckons with practice and his guiding hand could be successful. Lead by a pretty good singer, Deco, the band starts to improve and gets a few gigs. Friction in the band between members sees the whole thing unravel with some violence. A fun movie with a great soundtrack but there is a lot of cussing! Jimmy often narrates the movie as if he's being interviewed by Terry Wogan which is really quite funny.
The Commitments, 8/10; A 1991 musical comedy available on Peacock. Based in Dublin the movie is about Jimmy Rabbitte an aspiring band manager who is putting together a soul band in a run down part of the city. He assembles a bunch musicians who can't play very well but he reckons with practice and his guiding hand could be successful. Lead by a pretty good singer, Deco, the band starts to improve and gets a few gigs. Friction in the band between members sees the whole thing unravel with some violence. A fun movie with a great soundtrack but there is a lot of cussing! Jimmy often narrates the movie as if he's being interviewed by Terry Wogan which is really quite funny.
Paths Of Glory, 8/10; Stars Kirk Douglas and directed by Stanley Kubrick. Set in France during WWI it is the story of a French regiment fighting in the trenches who refuse to go over the top because of heavy German machine gun fire. The repercussions that follow end up with three soldiers put on trial for the lives facing charges of cowardice. The charges are brought by a vengeful general and the three soldiers are defended by Kirk Douglas. A great performance from Kirk Douglas and directed in the inimitable style of Kubrick makes this a great watch.
Three Days Of The Condor, 7/10; Starts Robert Redford, Faye Dunaway and Max von Sydow. This is an intriguing CIA spy thriller with Redford playing CIA analyst Joe Turner who reads published books looking for clues about potential covert operations from governments and terrorist groups. While out of the office picking up lunch a team of assassins enters the office and kills everyone in the office. When Turner returns to the office he discovers the carnage and grabs a handgun and leaves. He contacts CIA HQ to get instructions on what to do. Fearful his life is still in danger he trusts no one and rightly so as he is a loose end. A decent thriller but a bit slow at times.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.