• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Epstein, Kiddies, And Trump. Oh, My

www.mediaite.com

Jim Jordan: Ghislaine Maxwell 'Confirms' Trump in the Clear

Jordan is holding up Ghislaine Maxwell's DOJ interview as confirmation that President Trump "didn't do anything wrong" as it relates to Jeffrey Epstein.
www.mediaite.com www.mediaite.com

You know, someday those files will come out and these people will have to deal with the backlash of defending a pedo.
 
ZiprHead said:
www.mediaite.com

Jim Jordan: Ghislaine Maxwell 'Confirms' Trump in the Clear

Jordan is holding up Ghislaine Maxwell's DOJ interview as confirmation that President Trump "didn't do anything wrong" as it relates to Jeffrey Epstein.
www.mediaite.com www.mediaite.com

You know, someday those files will come out and these people will have to deal with the backlash of defending a pedo.
Click to expand...
If those files come out, I think the backlash will be more against them for also being named in the files. I think that's why they think it's better to clearly and brazenly lie rather than allow the consequences to come quite yet
 
Loren Pechtel said:
Supposedly (untrustworthy source) they are going to redact the Republicans out of the files.

Click to expand...
They're going to try to, but it's not going to work.

Apparently, there's a second set of Epstein files being put together by the victims which will very likely "key out" all the redactions.

Hell, it may already have been put together, according to the lawyers for the victims.

The very fact that there will be two sets, with all the stories and events from one validated as having happened (the official but redacted version), and a second, independently assembled version made before the release of those stories containing all the same stories (but not capable of being validated without the original redacted release), and which names all the people on the first set.

It's a sort of ideological "pincer" where the one set of documents prove that the events happened and the second, in its development in isolation but core agreement on dates, reveals names.

They would have to not only redact but falsify dates and events in the files, releasing a whole-cloth fiction, to truly ratfuck this.
 
The Epstein survivors threatening to release "the list" themselves, if the administration won't (it won't), are already deserving of a Medal of Freedom.
Of course it won't be the "official" list, but I believe it will carry all the weight and more, of anything this lying administration puts out.
This could get REAL interesting.
 
The only thing that will take attention away from the Epstein files is the upcoming inflation data. Not that it will help Trump, but it will increase the unemployment numbers for Washington DC.
 
Bronzeage said:
The only thing that will take attention away from the Epstein files is the upcoming inflation data. Not that it will help Trump, but it will increase the unemployment numbers for Washington DC.
Click to expand...
Well, certainly there will be a lot of homicide detectives out of work but maybe they can get jobs in the now booming restaurant business!!
 
Bronzeage said:
The only thing that will take attention away from the Epstein files is the upcoming inflation data. Not that it will help Trump, but it will increase the unemployment numbers for Washington DC.
Click to expand...
It better damn well help Trump, or heads are going to roll! :rofl:

Inflation data could quell any urge the Fed may have had to lower interest rates because of rising unemployment. More heads roll.
I do not believe the Union can withstand another 16 months of this shit, let alone 3+ years. SCOTUS is playing right along.
 
Last edited:
Elixir said:
The Epstein survivors threatening to release "the list" themselves, if the administration won't (it won't), are already deserving of a Medal of Freedom.
Of course it won't be the "official" list, but I believe it will carry all the weight and more, of anything this lying administration puts out.
This could get REAL interesting.
Click to expand...
They'll all commit suicide before that happens. At this point, they might as well be jumping out of windows.
 
TV and credit cards said:
Elixir said:
The Epstein survivors threatening to release "the list" themselves, if the administration won't (it won't), are already deserving of a Medal of Freedom.
Of course it won't be the "official" list, but I believe it will carry all the weight and more, of anything this lying administration puts out.
This could get REAL interesting.
Click to expand...
They'll all commit suicide before that happens. At this point, they might as well be jumping out of windows.
Click to expand...
The survivors? They’re survivors.
They survived Epstein, they survived Trump and they can survive Trump again.
Some of the perps might go suicidal, but good riddance.
 
www.nbcnews.com

DOJ says names of two associates Epstein wired $100k and $250k to should stay secret

The Justice Department request came after NBC News asked a federal judge to unseal the names of two people Epstein paid and helped protect from prosecution.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com
The Justice Department on Friday asked a federal judge overseeing the case of deceased sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein to deny a request from NBC News to unseal the names of two associates who received large payments from him in 2018, court documents show. The Justice Department cited privacy concerns expressed by the two individuals as the reason for not making their names public.

The first associate received a payment of $100,000 from Epstein and the second associate received a payment of $250,000, both in 2018, days after the Miami Herald began publishing a series of investigative stories where victims criticized a plea deal he received in Florida in 2008.


As part of the plea agreement, Epstein secured a statement from federal prosecutors in Florida that the two individuals would not be prosecuted.

The payments became public after Epstein was indicted and arrested in New York in 2019 and asked to be released on bail. Federal prosecutors in New York filed a memorandum on July 16, 2019, that argued Epstein should remain in jail to prevent him from tampering with witnesses.

They cited the payments he made to the two individuals, which began two days after the Miami Herald began publishing its stories on Epstein’s plea deal, also known as a nonprosecution agreement, or NPA.
Click to expand...
More in the link.
 
ZiprHead said:
www.nbcnews.com

DOJ says names of two associates Epstein wired $100k and $250k to should stay secret

The Justice Department request came after NBC News asked a federal judge to unseal the names of two people Epstein paid and helped protect from prosecution.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com
The Justice Department on Friday asked a federal judge overseeing the case of deceased sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein to deny a request from NBC News to unseal the names of two associates who received large payments from him in 2018, court documents show. The Justice Department cited privacy concerns expressed by the two individuals as the reason for not making their names public.

The first associate received a payment of $100,000 from Epstein and the second associate received a payment of $250,000, both in 2018, days after the Miami Herald began publishing a series of investigative stories where victims criticized a plea deal he received in Florida in 2008.


As part of the plea agreement, Epstein secured a statement from federal prosecutors in Florida that the two individuals would not be prosecuted.

The payments became public after Epstein was indicted and arrested in New York in 2019 and asked to be released on bail. Federal prosecutors in New York filed a memorandum on July 16, 2019, that argued Epstein should remain in jail to prevent him from tampering with witnesses.

They cited the payments he made to the two individuals, which began two days after the Miami Herald began publishing its stories on Epstein’s plea deal, also known as a nonprosecution agreement, or NPA.
Click to expand...
More in the link.
Click to expand...
Non-prosecution agreement. I don't see how it's acceptable to void that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom