• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

What Is Philosophy?

Academic philosophy is dead. No professor wants to engage with the implications that philosophy has made clear over the past two centuries, namely, the inevitability of communism and Judaism.
 
Academic philosophy is dead. No professor wants to engage with the implications that philosophy has made clear over the past two centuries, namely, the inevitability of communism and Judaism.

Thank you for the intelligent, well thought out, and reasoned contribution to the topic.

As to Judaism, why not go trough the formal conversion process to Judaism. Join a synagogue or move to Israel.

I have nothing against Jews in general. I knew someone who converted when he married a Jew, I have known Jews. They can be quite friendly, accepting, and gregarious.
 
I have known Jews. They can be quite friendly, accepting, and gregarious.
Really?
I’ve known some [native American, black, Hispanic, female, short people, Puerto Rican, Danish people, Hindus, Jamaican, Inuit, Russian, Japanese, Belgian] people.
They can be quite friendly, accepting, and gregarious.
 
I have known Jews. They can be quite friendly, accepting, and gregarious.
Really?
I’ve known some [native American, black, Hispanic, female, short people, Puerto Rican, Danish people, Hindus, Jamaican, Inuit, Russian, Japanese, Belgian] people.
They can be quite friendly, accepting, and gregarious.
No kidding, really?

On my floor in my senor building I have Blacks, Chinese, Viennese for neighbors. The entire two building complex is diverse. I know a Puerto Rican, Samoan, and a Philippino.

I be on edge of Catatonia.

I grew up in integrated public housing in the 50s 60s with black neighbors and kids.


I was speaking in the context of NR's pushing a global Judaism, suggesting he convert to Judaism.
 
Academic philosophy is dead. No professor wants to engage with the implications that philosophy has made clear over the past two centuries, namely, the inevitability of communism and Judaism.

Thank you for the intelligent, well thought out, and reasoned contribution to the topic.

Do you require citations?

As to Judaism, why not go trough the formal conversion process to Judaism. Join a synagogue or move to Israel.

I am establishing my own shul. Interested?
 
Academic philosophy is dead. No professor wants to engage with the implications that philosophy has made clear over the past two centuries, namely, the inevitability of communism and Judaism.

Thank you for the intelligent, well thought out, and reasoned contribution to the topic.

Do you require citations?

As to Judaism, why not go trough the formal conversion process to Judaism. Join a synagogue or move to Israel.

I am establishing my own shul. Interested?
No I am not, please try not to derail the thread.

Start a thread on religion if you want to proselytize.b Don't be a schmuck.

You can find citations on the net or in print to support most any views. Bupkis.

Shul? Yiddish was in the vocabulary when I was growing up.

Oy vey.
 
^Because you have taken the time and trouble to respond, I will provide a quotation that illustrates my position:

I do not want the belief in life after death to return, and in any case it is not likely to return. What I do point out is that its disappearance has left a big hole, and that we ought to take notice of that fact. Reared for thousands of years on the notion that the individual survives, man has got to make a considerable psychological effort to get used to the notion that the individual perishes. He is not likely to salvage civilization unless he can evolve a system of good and evil which is independent of heaven and hell. Marxism, indeed, does supply this, but it has never really been popularized. Most Socialists are content to point out that once Socialism has been established we shall be happier in a material sense, and to assume that all problems lapse when one’s belly is full. The truth is the opposite: when one’s belly is empty, one’s only problem is an empty belly. It is when we have got away from drudgery and exploitation that we shall really start wondering about man’s destiny and the reason for his existence. One cannot have any worthwhile picture of the future unless one realises how much we have lost by the decay of Christianity.--"As I please" / George Orwell. In Tribune, 3 March 1944

Orwell here touches on the key issues of contemporary philosophy: Christianity and Marxism. He is correct to see them as related, but he does not clearly understand their relationship. The fact is that both Christianity and Marxism are children of Judaism. On the specific question he raises about life after death, all that is necessary is to understand this from the Jewish position, namely, that eternal life is a property of the Jewish people as a whole, and the individual shares in eternal life to the extent that he identifies with the Jewish people as a whole.
 
NR

I have no idea what you are trying to do. You don't seem to know. Nobody is interested in global Judaism and Marxism, least of all Jews I expect.
 
On my floor in my senor building I have Blacks,
That’s cool. 😎
{starts backing away}
How many do you have?
Neighbors I know and socialize with.

I found Viennese and Cambodians to be open and social. Older Chinese who grew up in Chinese culture are more circumspect and socially closed. It can take a hie to build a relationship.

In Chin own there are stores where if you are not Chinese you can be ignored or get served last.

If you are an armchair liberal ride around on busses for a day in a city like Chicago, Seattle, or La and sit next to those not like you and strkie up a conversation, see what happens.
 
I love how when Boomers are trying to prove they aren't racist, their instinct seems to be to just start listing off all the racial stereotypes they know. :ROFLMAO:
 
Here is Waton on the subject of the response of establishment scientists, philosophers and historians to the inevitability of universal communism:

Never before did philosophers and scientists insist that there is no purpose in human existence, and therefore no history, as now. Why? This is the reason. In the past, the future was promising; men looked forward to ever greater progress, and they anticipated a time when mankind will live in peace and enjoy the good of life. The future appeared bright and glorious. But now the future reveals itself to become universal communism. To accept universal communism, one must completely break with the existing social order. No man putting his hand to the plow, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of heaven. But the philosophers, the scientists and the historians cannot break with the existing social order; they are organically and indissolubly bound up with the existing social order. Since, however, universal communism stares them in the face; since universal communism is becoming a world power, the philosophers, the scientists and historians shut their eyes, they do not see the future, and declare there is no history. This happened before. So long as the class struggle between labor and capital was yet in abeyance or did not manifest itself in its true nature, so long men of thought honestly endeavored to understand the laws that govern the economic relations of production and distribution. But, when the class struggle revealed itself in its true historic nature, then it was no longer possible for a thinking person to study the economic laws honestly and dispassionately, unless he was intellectually and spiritually great enough to cast his lot with the working class to whom the future belongs. And so, when historians and philosophers tell us that there is no purpose in human existence, and that there is no history, we must not take what they tell us seriously. All that we can tell them is this: If they cannot identify themselves with the future, they will be retired into the past, and mankind will get along very well without them.

It is a similar case with regard to the inevitability of universal Judaism.
 
I love how when Boomers are trying to prove they aren't racist, their instinct seems to be to just start listing off all the racial stereotypes they know. :ROFLMAO:
As I sad to you before, you are in an intellectual feel good bubble isolated from reality. The progressive fantasy world.

My views on people and culture come from experience starting when I was a kid. There was racism in my family, in particular two uncles. Fortunately my father was not. His blue collar view was anyone who went out and worked was ok. My sisters bay sat for the black familynext door.

You claim to be an expert in culture, but you know facts without experience.

A black guy in my building was in China during Tiananmen Square with his father in law a college teacher. He calls China the most racist country in the world.

On a recent NPR show on China an intervene with a black African who chose to go to China for school. He thought he would fare better socially than in America. He too saw China as racist.

Of course not all Chinese are racist and parochial, but all cultures have bias and prejudice.

In the 70s I knew a Jewish woman who married a Catholic. I knew her parents and they had no p[rblem. Some in her extedd family treated her as a non perosn.

Italiann cuture in re USA can have pressure to marry withn the group.

I knew a woman about 6 years ago who came here from Peru as a teen. She married a black guy. Her family had no problem. The guy's black family opposed the marriage. Once married his family had n nothing to do with them.

If you were around blacks long enough you would hear some of the same racial slurs you would hear from whites. Antisemitism. Homophobia.

Same with Latinos.

So my woke friend put your views to he test. It is easy to moralize using cliches from hhe comfort of your living room.

You said humans are inherently good. When I asked on what you base that claim your usual non response. On what basis other tan what somebody else says or writes do you claim what I posted was stereotypes? Or are you just mouthing an ideological knee jerk response.

That all cultures are wonderful and not to be criticized is a progressive meme. Except of course the evil, 'white' culture that needs to be reeducated by the woke culture. Like the Chinese Cultural Revolution.
 
I love how when Boomers are trying to prove they aren't racist, their instinct seems to be to just start listing off all the racial stereotypes they know. :ROFLMAO:
He's even friends with Viennese. And we all know who was born in Austria.
Gregor Mendel, of course! The connections are all clear now.
 
I love how when Boomers are trying to prove they aren't racist, their instinct seems to be to just start listing off all the racial stereotypes they know. :ROFLMAO:
As I sad to you before, you are in an intellectual feel good bubble isolated from reality. The progressive fantasy world.

As opposed to your regressive, philosophically illiterate fantasy world, Steve?


My views on people and culture come from experience starting when I was a kid.

Whose doesn’t? But see Krishnamurti on conditioning.


There was racism in my family, in particular two uncles. Fortunately my father was not. His blue collar view was anyone who went out and worked was ok. My sisters bay sat for the black familynext door.

Do you have a point here?

You claim to be an expert in culture, but you know facts without experience.

Do tell. You know this how? And how does one know facts without experience? What does that even mean?

A black guy in my building was in China during Tiananmen Square with his father in law a college teacher. He calls China the most racist country in the world.

Your point?

On a recent NPR show on China an intervene with a black African who chose to go to China for school. He thought he would fare better socially than in America. He too saw China as racist.

Gee. Is there some point here?

Of course not all Chinese are racist and parochial, but all cultures have bias and prejudice.

Gee. No shit, Steve. Do you have a point that all of us don’t already know?


In the 70s I knew a Jewish woman who married a Catholic. I knew her parents and they had no p[rblem. Some in her extedd family treated her as a non perosn.

Italiann cuture in re USA can have pressure to marry withn the group.

I knew a woman about 6 years ago who came here from Peru as a teen. She married a black guy. Her family had no problem. The guy's black family opposed the marriage. Once married his family had n nothing to do with them.

If you were around blacks long enough you would hear some of the same racial slurs you would hear from whites. Antisemitism. Homophobia.

Same with Latinos.

Is there a point here?

So my woke friend put your views to he test. It is easy to moralize using cliches from hhe comfort of your living room.

Oh, there it is! The little “woke” boogyman!

You said humans are inherently good. When I asked on what you base that claim your usual non response. On what basis other tan what somebody else says or writes do you claim what I posted was stereotypes? Or are you just mouthing an ideological knee jerk response.

That all cultures are wonderful and not to be criticized is a progressive meme. Except of course the evil, 'white' culture that needs to be reeducated by the woke culture. Like the Chinese Cultural Revolution.

There we go! The nut of your stupid little diatribe. The white man’s burden. The crybaby plaint of a privileged white man who thinks he belongs to the superior race and gender.

Except that “woke” does NOT mean that other cultures and ethnicities are not to be criticized. ALL are to be criticized.

Woke is simply shorthand for an ancient idea: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. It applies to everyone everywhere. If it doesn’t, we are all sunk.

Something wrong with that, Steve?
 
It seems that growing up poor, and greatly disadvantaged by double minority status, but turning turnips into tulips and getting a degree anyway, then spending twelve years working in the community college system, spending every free minute working with people from all walks of life albeit mostly poor ones, doing outreach to the prison system, cold calling folks during election season, etc has taught me absolutely nothing about society, apparently!

Because I also got an advanced degree during that time, which means I live in an "ivory tower" and know nothing compared to Steve. The only true knowledge comes from watching CNN, occasionally walking to the grocery store, almost remembering an anecdote you heard once, and sort of knowing a Black guy who lives in your building. No really, a retired middle class white guy on the internet told me so. People really believe this kind of bullshit!
 
Here is Waton on the subject of the response of establishment scientists, philosophers and historians to the inevitability of universal communism:

Never before did philosophers and scientists insist that there is no purpose in human existence, and therefore no history, as now. Why? This is the reason. In the past, the future was promising; men looked forward to ever greater progress, and they anticipated a time when mankind will live in peace and enjoy the good of life. The future appeared bright and glorious. But now the future reveals itself to become universal communism. To accept universal communism, one must completely break with the existing social order. No man putting his hand to the plow, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of heaven. But the philosophers, the scientists and the historians cannot break with the existing social order; they are organically and indissolubly bound up with the existing social order. Since, however, universal communism stares them in the face; since universal communism is becoming a world power, the philosophers, the scientists and historians shut their eyes, they do not see the future, and declare there is no history. This happened before. So long as the class struggle between labor and capital was yet in abeyance or did not manifest itself in its true nature, so long men of thought honestly endeavored to understand the laws that govern the economic relations of production and distribution. But, when the class struggle revealed itself in its true historic nature, then it was no longer possible for a thinking person to study the economic laws honestly and dispassionately, unless he was intellectually and spiritually great enough to cast his lot with the working class to whom the future belongs. And so, when historians and philosophers tell us that there is no purpose in human existence, and that there is no history, we must not take what they tell us seriously. All that we can tell them is this: If they cannot identify themselves with the future, they will be retired into the past, and mankind will get along very well without them.

It is a similar case with regard to the inevitability of universal Judaism.

Only needs are inevitable. Our wants and how they shape society may be formed by countless factors.
 
Back
Top Bottom