They are poor, radicalized, under-educated, under-skilled. Netanyahu tried to sneak them into Egypt early on, Egypt was like "No thanks" and closed the border. No one wants the Gazans. This is part of the problem. They are orphans no one cares about.
This is a problem. Hamas will take advantage of any weakness Israel provides. Their goal is disruption, nothing else. What Israel has done with Gaza hasn't helped its own security. They are effectively creating a powder keg. It went off once on October 7th. But freeing things up comes with its own security risks. I'd hate to be in charge of Israeli security. The more you open things up, the more threats on the average Israeli. The more you tighten it up, the more threats of brief but big acts of terror.
www.cbsnews.com
It is most certainly a form ofEthnic_cleansing
Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making the society ethnically homogeneous. Along with direct removal such as deportation or population transfer, it also includes indirect methods aimed at forced migration by coercing the victim group to flee and preventing its return, such as murder, rape, and property destruction. Both the definition and charge of ethnic cleansing is often disputed, with some researchers including and others excluding coercive assimilation or mass killings as a means of depopulating an area of a particular group, or calling it a euphemism for genocide or cultural genocide.
West Bank history indicates that is counterfactual. It emboldens settlers and sets the stage for more expansion.It is most certainly a form of
Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making the society ethnically homogeneous. Along with direct removal such as deportation or population transfer, it also includes indirect methods aimed at forced migration by coercing the victim group to flee and preventing its return, such as murder, rape, and property destruction. Both the definition and charge of ethnic cleansing is often disputed, with some researchers including and others excluding coercive assimilation or mass killings as a means of depopulating an area of a particular group, or calling it a euphemism for genocide or cultural genocide.
Taking over the west bank officially won't displace any Palestinians already living there.
Your naïveté would be cuter if wasn’t underpinned by bigotry.
West Bank history indicates that is counterfactual. It emboldens settlers and sets the stage for more expansion.It is most certainly a form of
Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making the society ethnically homogeneous. Along with direct removal such as deportation or population transfer, it also includes indirect methods aimed at forced migration by coercing the victim group to flee and preventing its return, such as murder, rape, and property destruction. Both the definition and charge of ethnic cleansing is often disputed, with some researchers including and others excluding coercive assimilation or mass killings as a means of depopulating an area of a particular group, or calling it a euphemism for genocide or cultural genocide.
Taking over the west bank officially won't displace any Palestinians already living there.
Just look at map of the West Bank in 1967, 1997 and now: more settlements. And how does Israel choose were to expand - illegal settlements which thrive by ethnically cleansing the area.West Bank history indicates that is counterfactual. It emboldens settlers and sets the stage for more expansion.It is most certainly a form of
Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making the society ethnically homogeneous. Along with direct removal such as deportation or population transfer, it also includes indirect methods aimed at forced migration by coercing the victim group to flee and preventing its return, such as murder, rape, and property destruction. Both the definition and charge of ethnic cleansing is often disputed, with some researchers including and others excluding coercive assimilation or mass killings as a means of depopulating an area of a particular group, or calling it a euphemism for genocide or cultural genocide.
Taking over the west bank officially won't displace any Palestinians already living there.
Prov it!
You’re only fooling yourself.
Just look at map of the West Bank in 1967, 1997 and now: more settlements. And how does Israel choose were to expand - illegal settlements which thrive by ethnically cleansing the area.West Bank history indicates that is counterfactual. It emboldens settlers and sets the stage for more expansion.It is most certainly a form of
Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making the society ethnically homogeneous. Along with direct removal such as deportation or population transfer, it also includes indirect methods aimed at forced migration by coercing the victim group to flee and preventing its return, such as murder, rape, and property destruction. Both the definition and charge of ethnic cleansing is often disputed, with some researchers including and others excluding coercive assimilation or mass killings as a means of depopulating an area of a particular group, or calling it a euphemism for genocide or cultural genocide.
Taking over the west bank officially won't displace any Palestinians already living there.
Prov it!
Really?!? I have it on good authority the the Palestinians in the west bank will be treated just like their Israeli brethren.
Cool story , but it doesn’t change the facts on the ground.Just look at map of the West Bank in 1967, 1997 and now: more settlements. And how does Israel choose were to expand - illegal settlements which thrive by ethnically cleansing the area.West Bank history indicates that is counterfactual. It emboldens settlers and sets the stage for more expansion.It is most certainly a form of
Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making the society ethnically homogeneous. Along with direct removal such as deportation or population transfer, it also includes indirect methods aimed at forced migration by coercing the victim group to flee and preventing its return, such as murder, rape, and property destruction. Both the definition and charge of ethnic cleansing is often disputed, with some researchers including and others excluding coercive assimilation or mass killings as a means of depopulating an area of a particular group, or calling it a euphemism for genocide or cultural genocide.
Taking over the west bank officially won't displace any Palestinians already living there.
Prov it!
Israel doesn't view the west bank as occupied. Jordan took it illegally in 1948. In Israel they view it as them taking it back in 1967.
In 1948 Jordan expelled all the Jews from the west bank.
At what point is the resettlement of Jews fair considering the ethnic makeup in 1948? That's harder to define.
I understand Israel who thinks its quibbling. The west bank should have been part of Israel right from the start (in 1948). Both Palestinians and Jews of the
Prove it.
Cool story , but it doesn’t change the facts on the ground.Just look at map of the West Bank in 1967, 1997 and now: more settlements. And how does Israel choose were to expand - illegal settlements which thrive by ethnically cleansing the area.West Bank history indicates that is counterfactual. It emboldens settlers and sets the stage for more expansion.It is most certainly a form of
Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making the society ethnically homogeneous. Along with direct removal such as deportation or population transfer, it also includes indirect methods aimed at forced migration by coercing the victim group to flee and preventing its return, such as murder, rape, and property destruction. Both the definition and charge of ethnic cleansing is often disputed, with some researchers including and others excluding coercive assimilation or mass killings as a means of depopulating an area of a particular group, or calling it a euphemism for genocide or cultural genocide.
Taking over the west bank officially won't displace any Palestinians already living there.
Prov it!
Israel doesn't view the west bank as occupied. Jordan took it illegally in 1948. In Israel they view it as them taking it back in 1967.
In 1948 Jordan expelled all the Jews from the west bank.
At what point is the resettlement of Jews fair considering the ethnic makeup in 1948? That's harder to define.
I understand Israel who thinks its quibbling. The west bank should have been part of Israel right from the start (in 1948). Both Palestinians and Jews of the
In 1929 it was the Jews in Hebron (West Bank) who faced lynching, arson etc. Headline from 1929 newspaper.
