barbos
Contributor
You should have interfered and helped with food back then. Why are you trying interfere now when Chinese are pretty fat?Communism and awful leadership through it got millions of Chinese to starve.China is the only example of self-contained regime which escaped US/West wrath.But do they allow observers to fairly judge what the sanctioned might have done if they had not been sanctioned?
The Irony is, in USSR in the 60-70s they were thinking about doing the same thing China did later. But then oil crisis happened and shitload of money came, which was spectacularly wasted on supporting Africa, Latin America and importing food. I remember the food, which then quickly disappeared once the oil prices fell.
But China has proven that socialist regimes are capable of managing the economy as well as the best capitalist regimes.
One, of course, can say that China is Socialism in name only. It does not matter, regime transitioned to "capitalism" by its own plan. Chinese have to thank Russians for that.
For comparison, look at India which was kinda in the same situation at the start as China but a capitalist democracy.
Not to mention capitalist shitholes of South America. So superiority of capitalist system is not that obvious.
Chinese are doing fine, and Russia is doing fine too.
I think capitalism has run its course. We need a better system. I mean for all intents and purposes we have all the necessary prerequisites for some kind of communism. Capitalism is in its "diminishing returns" stage where it spends most of its resources (look at $1.5T war budget) on prolonging itself.The Catholic Church managed a good starvation in Ireland too. Dictators in Africa have helped their people starve. The US fucked up in the prairies, but good leadership helped fix agricultural mistakes and the US became a remarkable producer of food. .
Capitalism is necessary, but it needs a leash. A short one called socialism.

