It's important to remember, the cornerstone of the GOP is angry white men and most white men are stupid. It's very easy to anger a stupid white man, which makes them easy to manipulate. Nothing a stupid white man is told has to be true or make sense. If it aligns with his preconceived ideas, it will not be examined. If you combine this message with the promise of some benefit without personal effort, it's a winning sales pitch. Tell them they should have a submissive(at least a 7) wife and you have an auditorium of bobbleheads all nodding for you. They are very happy. Now you tell them that liberals ruined all the submissive women by giving them rights and they get angry. They don't care that liberals are why there's a minimum wage, a 40 hour work week, and Social Security disability payments. Tell him that women won't talk to him because a liberal told her not to, and he is mad and looking for something to take it out on.Andrew Tate and Andrew Tate adjacent manosphere “alpha males” are the purveyors of fine trad wives. There is no spin needed to portray the right wanting men to dominate wives when reading the words of Pete Hegseth’s preacher Doug Williams. Not sure why it is okay for the GOP to welcome such people and even protect them from prosecution, whereas it is a capital offense for a liberal to speak against systemic racism or implicit misogyny. Are we supposed to pretend that Doug Williams and Project 2025 don’t exist?"Trad wife" is a pejorative term directed at white American families and nothing less; and how that's spun into the husband dominating the wife is flat out bizarre. Your interpretation is a paper thin attempt to provide cover for yet another reason so many people have been pushed away from voting for more progressive candidates.You need to learn what the terms mean! "Trad wife" is not simply about having a husband and children, but about him being completely in control and she stays at home.Families: the term "trad wife" has become a derogatory term directed toward women who want to have a traditional marriage i.e. husband and children. These comments are almost exclusively pointed toward white women and therefore white families.
I don't think the university system is flawed as such. Studying the sciences tends to move people to the left.I could go on e.g. illegal immigration, support of Hamas, antisemitism, the university system, etc.
I do agree there's a problem with with supporting things that should not be supported, but that's due to a very large and well planned campaign of misinformation. The right demonizes those who won't roll over for fascism, the left demonizes those who won't roll over for Islamic fundamentalism.
And few are interested in trying to teach people how to avoid falling for the propaganda because it would work both ways.
The DNC could put a stop to this by vocally rejecting people who say shit like this. It's mostly young people espousing this absurd point of view and they don't show up to vote anyway.
The university system has become a farce when it comes to things like the social "sciences" along with the advocacy of radical political history and systems. I've said it before and I'll say it again: I went back to college fairly late in life and I came away with an understanding of why conservatives are so up in arms. The far left complains about "hate" to the point it's lost any meaning. Anything that one disagrees with = hate. Just like the instant accusations of racism, misogyny, etc., it's an attempt to shut down honest conversation. Case in point: a certain someone here took what I said about another subject and then performed contortions in order to accuse me of wanting trans people put in jail.
I didn't respond because it wasn't worthy of a response.
The understandable perception among millions is that they're not wanted--that the Dems have become a party of exclusion. Meanwhile the GOP welcomes all but the smallest demographics. The GOP and its horrifying support for Trump is awful beyond words but they're a lot smarter than the people running the DNC.
For a stupid white man, violence is not the first resort, but it's close to the top. One aspect of the stupid white man is an inability to see past Step 2. It simply never occurs to him that there might be a different future than the one he imagines.
This is how we get the fairly straightforward problem of Iran. It goes like this:
Iran wants a nuclear weapon because they think it will prevent us from bombing them.
Stupid white man reaction: Bomb them before they make a nuclear weapon.
Smart person asks:
Will that stop them from getting a nuclear weapon?
Stupid white man:
Maybe or maybe we keep bombing.
Smart person asks:
What about disruptions to the world energy market.
Stupid white man:
They can't disrupt anything. We bombed them.
