Toni
Contributor
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 25,177
- Basic Beliefs
- Peace on Earth, goodwill towards all
We cannot wait for everyone. Some people believe the earth is flat or that humans and dinosaurs coexisted and that Trump is a good, Christian man.Let me get this straight, just so we're crystal fucking clear.What I...
..Anything other than someone exposing their genitals inappropriately so as to know that they are a pervert and sex offender....have been trying to explain is that IN THAT MOMENT women [do not] need something to indicate that the person before them with an exposed nakedpenis[genitals] is...
You believe that a full grown adult male of the human species, with a sex offender record for serious offenses, should be allowed by law to go into the female showers and changing rooms at the local community pool and watch little girls change. And the girls and their parents should have no say about that at all... as long as he doesn't actually get his dick out.
Do you not see any potential problems with that?
If... as a justification for why adult males with fully intact genitals should be allowed by law to look at naked girls if those males say they're trans.
This sounds like an idea that is better in theory than application. I think there are a couple flaws to this:That does not mean I dismissed women's concerns. My observation that got this going was in post 486 and it was in response to a general question. And I never claimed it was foolproof.You have suggested talking to the person who concerns you to alleviate concerns.Which concerns of women do you think I dismissed? I ask, because to my knowledge, you are vastly mistaken.Yes.Bless your heart, it most certainly does.
IDo you have a relevant point or are you just virtue signaling?
I'm pointing out that your casual dismissal of women's concerns is the bigotry going on here.
Tom
It’s been pointed out that in a women’s shower it locker room is not the place to do that when the concerning individual has a male body that is naked.
More than once.
Response from you: crickets.
As for lockerroom/shower facilities, I would think that a sincere emotionally transwoman would be aware and sensitive about this issue, and would avoid such confrontations. Insincere or emotionally immature transwoman should be removed as quickly as possible.
1) Firstly, the trouble is the threshold to the immature. That it has to be managed at all is going to raise a problem, because once someone is up to no good, then that would require intervention, at which point, hasn't the system already failed? Currently, nothing stops this from occurring now, but the propensity for it to be possible will likely increase. Zero tolerance won't work because when males do something "it was just a joke, why does he have to sign up as a sex offender now" will push against it... oddly by some of the same people that insist transgenders not be allowed in the women's locker room.
2) Women in the locker room should be going about doing locker room things, not self-policing, right? There is no viable threshold for a woman to make a on the fly call on whether that person should be in there. In a perfect world, it should be as simple as 'if they are here, they should be here'. But a woman isn't going to know. This means how do you manage the doubt? The uncertainty, the uncomfortableness? This isn't a sort of 'get over it' thing. It is instinctual. I know with my daughter, one day she didn't care, then one day she cared... she cared a lot! Personally, I don't think a woman needs to have suffered trauma to be allowed a right to feel secure in such a space.
Hopefully we can move past this, but we aren't even to the stage of people accepting transgenders exist.
Yes, it is instinctual. It has nothing to do with hating or fearing men or trans people. It has to do with the desire for modesty, privacy and safety. Instinctual, yes, but too often informed by experience.
Q: "Who's that at the door?" A: "It's the pizza delivery guy."
