Oh, are you still here?
Not everything, but nice pointless use of hyperbole.
Maybe.
Incorrect. All Maddow pointed out was that Putin confirmed that he had a clear choice in the election, which contradicts the Trump/GOP argument that Putin was just meddling in general and had no particular bias toward or in support of one particular candidate. That is a
separate issue and an important point all on its own that he did, in fact, have a preferred candidate and therefore was not just meddling in general.
Of course if history is any indication they won't.
Since you are clearly not a student of history, here's a breakdown of instances where CNN anchors/reporters (and other legitimate news outlets)
made mistakes and then corrected those mistakes.
Putin does himself no favors by adding to the stress of translators. In this particular case, Putin was fumbling with his earpiece as the question was being asked, so he could conceivably have missed the last part of the question. However, he apparently has excellent understanding of English,
Wat part of "Putin started answering the first part 1 second after journalist finished his second part" you do not understand?
What part of
fallacy of the loaded question do you not understand? That was rhetorical, of course.
And no, he does not have excellent understanding of English
The Kremlin contradicts you, though the way they put it was "he practically understands English completely and sometimes even corrects the translators."