I have seen and read many sources on the case.
What is your evidence Sulkowitz was
lying?
The Daily Beast article you linked to is the most comprehensive of the three, although it failed to mention there was a fourth accuser, a male student who said Nungesser sexually assaulted him as well. Even so, in all that detailed account of who did what when, there's no evidence Sulkowitz was lying about Nungesser's actions. So why do you
believe she was? And just how certain is your belief? Is it provisional or absolute?
In this particular case, Nungesser said the sex was consensual. Why do you believe Sulkowicz and not Nungesser?
If all I had to go on was the basic he said/she said, I would probably think it was a horrible miscommunication, much like the Al and Bert scenario I presented earlier in the thread. But there are three other people who say Nungesser sexually assaulted them. For me, that tips the scales toward believing Sulkowitz' accusation and disbelieving Nungesser's denials.
BTW, they
both say the sex started out as consensual. Sulkowitz says that changed when Nungesser did something that was very painful and upsetting, and ignored her cries to stop. They both say he'd been drinking so perhaps that was a factor. Or maybe he just likes pushing past boundaries, which would certainly explain the other three accusations.
Anyway, you said Sulkowitz was
lying. Where's the evidence of that?