laughing dog, are you here to call out the endless whataboutisms in the thread?
As usual, conservatives demanding others follow standards that they don't follow themselves.
laughing dog, are you here to call out the endless whataboutisms in the thread?
If I recall it's always been the conservatives who started with the whataboutisms.
As usual, conservatives demanding others follow standards that they don't follow themselves.
If you are too afraid to engage with the issue in the OP, please don't believe you've been successful at disguising it.
As usual, conservatives demanding others follow standards that they don't follow themselves.
If you are too afraid to engage with the issue in the OP, please don't believe you've been successful at disguising it.
There's direct proof of my claim in your OP.
There's direct proof of my claim in your OP.
Proof of what? I've asked people to engage in the thread topic.
I didn't ask people to refrain from ad homs, because that is a hopeless proposition on this board.
There's direct proof of my claim in your OP.
Proof of what? I've asked people to engage in the thread topic.
I didn't ask people to refrain from ad homs, because that is a hopeless proposition on this board.
Especially when you yourself engage in it.
It's almost like, when you engage in such childish antics, people are less willing to engage in the topic at hand.
It's almost like, when you engage in such childish antics, people are less willing to engage in the topic at hand.
Yes: people ideologically opposed to me will use any tactic to avoid answering troubling questions.
It's almost like, when you engage in such childish antics, people are less willing to engage in the topic at hand.
Yes: people ideologically opposed to me will use any tactic to avoid answering troubling questions.
Perhaps it's because you were being needlessly inflammatory and you could've done a much better job of communicating your point, but you chose not to.
It's almost like, when you engage in such childish antics, people are less willing to engage in the topic at hand.
Yes: people ideologically opposed to me will use any tactic to avoid answering troubling questions.
Perhaps it's because you were being needlessly inflammatory and you could've done a much better job of communicating your point, but you chose not to.
Poor insecure, small-dicked right wingers are really upset about catching gender dysphoria.
Hey - maybe y'all should go get tested?
Perhaps it's because you were being needlessly inflammatory and you could've done a much better job of communicating your point, but you chose not to.
I don't know if you've noticed, but people are "needlessly inflammatory" all the time on this board. Perhaps it goes down easier or escapes your notice when the sustained vituperative is directed at the same people you would direct it at.
Do you think Biden's executive order was a good idea? Why or why not?
It definitely was a good idea. After all I'm just an evil communist leftist who doesn't give a shit about women, right?
It definitely was a good idea. After all I'm just an evil communist leftist who doesn't give a shit about women, right?
So, you appear to accept the need for sex separation in sports (unless you think there should not be men's/women's or boy's/girl's divisions), but also accept that sex separation can be ignored if somebody's gender identity does not align with their sex.
But, how do you square those two views away? When you see male bodied people like Yearwood and Miller competing against females, does that not strike you as unfair? If you don't find it unfair, why do you think there should be sex division in sports in the first place?
It definitely was a good idea. After all I'm just an evil communist leftist who doesn't give a shit about women, right?
So, you appear to accept the need for sex separation in sports (unless you think there should not be men's/women's or boy's/girl's divisions), but also accept that sex separation can be ignored if somebody's gender identity does not align with their sex.
But, how do you square those two views away? When you see male bodied people like Yearwood and Miller competing against females, does that not strike you as unfair? If you don't find it unfair, why do you think there should be sex division in sports in the first place?
I dunno. Personally I just want people to be able to fuck as many animals as they want to. Eventually we'll get to that point with all the stuff we're allowing, right? Whatever gets us to true communism, I'm 100% for. Plus, people should be allowed to eat as many babies and kittens as they want to.