Biden begins erasing girls on day one: transgender executive order

[Metaphor]

laughing dog, are you here to call out the endless whataboutisms in the thread?

 

[GenesisNemesis]

laughing dog, are you here to call out the endless whataboutisms in the thread?

If I recall it's always been the conservatives who started with the whataboutisms.

 

[Metaphor]

As usual, conservatives demanding others follow standards that they don't follow themselves.

If you are too afraid to engage with the issue in the OP, please don't believe you've been successful at disguising it.

 

[Metaphor]

laughing dog, are you here to call out the endless whataboutisms in the thread?

If I recall it's always been the conservatives who started with the whataboutisms.

I posted an OP about Biden signing an executive order that will allow male-bodied high school students to compete against females in sports. If you have no thoughts on this topic I suggest you refrain from engaging in the thread.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

As usual, conservatives demanding others follow standards that they don't follow themselves.

If you are too afraid to engage with the issue in the OP, please don't believe you've been successful at disguising it.

There's direct proof of my claim in your OP.

 

[Metaphor]

As usual, conservatives demanding others follow standards that they don't follow themselves.

If you are too afraid to engage with the issue in the OP, please don't believe you've been successful at disguising it.

There's direct proof of my claim in your OP.

Proof of what? I've asked people to engage in the thread topic.

I didn't ask people to refrain from ad homs, because that is a hopeless proposition on this board. The board has basically been continual invective hurled against Republicans, Trump voters, the "alt-right", and whoever else deviates from the left-leaning orthodoxy for years.

And if your only "contribution" is ad hom, that isn't a contribution at all.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

There's direct proof of my claim in your OP.

Proof of what? I've asked people to engage in the thread topic.

I didn't ask people to refrain from ad homs, because that is a hopeless proposition on this board.

Especially when you yourself engage in it.

 

[Metaphor]

There's direct proof of my claim in your OP.

Proof of what? I've asked people to engage in the thread topic.

I didn't ask people to refrain from ad homs, because that is a hopeless proposition on this board.

Especially when you yourself engage in it.

I didn't ask people to refrain from making ad homs. I asked them to, in addition to getting their hate on, actually discuss the OP.

Do you think Biden's executive order was a good idea and what are your reasons for your opinion?

 

[GenesisNemesis]

It's almost like, when you engage in such childish antics, people are less willing to engage in the topic at hand.

 

[Metaphor]

It's almost like, when you engage in such childish antics, people are less willing to engage in the topic at hand.

Yes: people ideologically opposed to me will use any tactic to avoid answering troubling questions.

Do you think Biden was right to allow trans-identified male-bodied teens compete against females in high school sports?

 

[GenesisNemesis]

It's almost like, when you engage in such childish antics, people are less willing to engage in the topic at hand.

Yes: people ideologically opposed to me will use any tactic to avoid answering troubling questions.

Perhaps it's because you were being needlessly inflammatory and you could've done a much better job of communicating your point, but you chose not to. It shows what your intent behind this post is.

 

[Metaphor]

It's almost like, when you engage in such childish antics, people are less willing to engage in the topic at hand.

Yes: people ideologically opposed to me will use any tactic to avoid answering troubling questions.

Perhaps it's because you were being needlessly inflammatory and you could've done a much better job of communicating your point, but you chose not to.

I don't know if you've noticed, but people are "needlessly inflammatory" all the time on this board. Perhaps it goes down easier or escapes your notice when the sustained vituperative is directed at the same people you would direct it at.

Do you think Biden's executive order was a good idea? Why or why not?

 

[Jarhyn]

It's almost like, when you engage in such childish antics, people are less willing to engage in the topic at hand.

Yes: people ideologically opposed to me will use any tactic to avoid answering troubling questions.

Perhaps it's because you were being needlessly inflammatory and you could've done a much better job of communicating your point, but you chose not to.

Not to mention they ignore the actual discussion? Like, there's been some substantive discussion here about when how, and why this measure is an effective answer to their concerns. It just happens that their "concerns" were apparently more "false concern" shaped. There's a word for it. Something about bridges and monsters, I think.

At any rate, they still haven't answered in any respect why it's better to have a decision forced upon you than to decide for yourself, provided the firmness of your resolve is checked against the prevailing evidence of probable positive outcome.

 

[thebeave]

Poor insecure, small-dicked right wingers are really upset about catching gender dysphoria.

Hey - maybe y'all should go get tested?

Small dicked. Heh. Good one. But, be careful with your dick jokes. Don't go so far as to call anyone dickless in a thread about trans people. Its very uncool.

 

[ideologyhunter]

Keep it to the size of your hands.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

Perhaps it's because you were being needlessly inflammatory and you could've done a much better job of communicating your point, but you chose not to.

I don't know if you've noticed, but people are "needlessly inflammatory" all the time on this board. Perhaps it goes down easier or escapes your notice when the sustained vituperative is directed at the same people you would direct it at.

Do you think Biden's executive order was a good idea? Why or why not?

It definitely was a good idea. After all I'm just an evil communist leftist who doesn't give a shit about women, right?

 

[Trausti]

 

[Metaphor]

It definitely was a good idea. After all I'm just an evil communist leftist who doesn't give a shit about women, right?

So, you appear to accept the need for sex separation in sports (unless you think there should not be men's/women's or boy's/girl's divisions), but also accept that sex separation can be ignored if somebody's gender identity does not align with their sex.

But, how do you square those two views away? When you see male bodied people like Yearwood and Miller competing against females, does that not strike you as unfair? If you don't find it unfair, why do you think there should be sex division in sports in the first place?

 

[GenesisNemesis]

It definitely was a good idea. After all I'm just an evil communist leftist who doesn't give a shit about women, right?

So, you appear to accept the need for sex separation in sports (unless you think there should not be men's/women's or boy's/girl's divisions), but also accept that sex separation can be ignored if somebody's gender identity does not align with their sex.

But, how do you square those two views away? When you see male bodied people like Yearwood and Miller competing against females, does that not strike you as unfair? If you don't find it unfair, why do you think there should be sex division in sports in the first place?

I dunno. Personally I just want people to be able to fuck as many animals as they want to. Eventually we'll get to that point with all the stuff we're allowing, right? Whatever gets us to true communism, I'm 100% for. Plus, people should be allowed to eat as many babies and kittens as they want to.

 

[Metaphor]

It definitely was a good idea. After all I'm just an evil communist leftist who doesn't give a shit about women, right?

So, you appear to accept the need for sex separation in sports (unless you think there should not be men's/women's or boy's/girl's divisions), but also accept that sex separation can be ignored if somebody's gender identity does not align with their sex.

But, how do you square those two views away? When you see male bodied people like Yearwood and Miller competing against females, does that not strike you as unfair? If you don't find it unfair, why do you think there should be sex division in sports in the first place?

I dunno. Personally I just want people to be able to fuck as many animals as they want to. Eventually we'll get to that point with all the stuff we're allowing, right? Whatever gets us to true communism, I'm 100% for. Plus, people should be allowed to eat as many babies and kittens as they want to.

So, you cannot explain your conflicting positions, but you believe both of them? How do you deal with such cognitive dissonance?

I don't see what communism has to do with laws forbidding bestiality. You are a communist if you think state ownership of the means of production should and will eventually dissolve into stateless communal ownership. As for eating kittens, I don't see that that is any better or worse than eating cows.