Another White Mass Murderer Taken Alive

[Gospel]

The cops didn't even halfway do their job. Not even a little bit of their job.

Right. They wanted no involvement with a domestic dispute. We know now who Dahmer was; but they didn’t. And his victim did not protest. We know now that’s because Dahmer drugged him and put acid in his brain; but they didn’t.

I bet top dollar those same cops were weed specialists during traffic stops.

 

[Trausti]

The cops didn't even halfway do their job. Not even a little bit of their job.

Right. They wanted no involvement with a domestic dispute. We know now who Dahmer was; but they didn’t. And his victim did not protest. We know now that’s because Dahmer drugged him and put acid in his brain; but they didn’t.

I bet top dollar those same cops were weed specialists during traffic stops.

Could be.

 

[Toni]

The cops didn't even halfway do their job. Not even a little bit of their job.

Right. They wanted no involvement with a domestic dispute. We know now who Dahmer was; but they didn’t. And his victim did not protest. We know now that’s because Dahmer drugged him and put acid in his brain; but they didn’t.

FFS, it was a 14 year old boy who WAS BLEEDING, and disoriented from being drugged and having a hole drilled into his head!

They did not even give a casual exam of the boy or they would have seen that he was injured more than the skinned knee Dahmer claimed. They did not investigate the scent of decaying human flesh in Dahmer's apartment. They did not run a background check on Dahmer which would have let them know that Dahmer had recently been released from a term served for sexually molesting his curren't victim's brother (the family did not know that Dahmer had been released). They did NOT listen to the young women who had called them to help the drugged, injured, disoriented, naked 14 year old who knew him from the neighborhood and knew he had been reported missing (taken by Dahmer). Their own department had a report out on the missing child.

Instead they believed the white guy.

It did not take them knowing that Dahmer was a serial killer and sexual predator who drugged and dismembered his victims. They did not have to know that he had already murdered at least 3 other young men/boys. They just had to believe the terrified victim and the young women who came to the victim's aid and attempted to get the boy help.

You know: they just should have not listened to the only white person there and actually done their job.

 

[Toni]

The cops didn't even halfway do their job. Not even a little bit of their job.

Right. They wanted no involvement with a domestic dispute. We know now who Dahmer was; but they didn’t. And his victim did not protest. We know now that’s because Dahmer drugged him and put acid in his brain; but they didn’t.

I bet top dollar those same cops were weed specialists during traffic stops.

FFS, the boy didn't appear stoned. He was naked, bleeding and 14 years old and there was a police report out on him as missing from his home! And the young women who called the police knew that and told the police! They just didn't listen to anyone except the white guy.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

So they do their jobs when the victim is straight?

Police have had a history of not getting involved in 'domestics'. This was probably far more prominent in the 1980s and I suspect police would be even more reluctant getting involved in same-sex 'domestics'.

The point is, the idea that Dahmer would have been caught sooner but for his 'white privilege' is unsubstantiated.

Yup, back then the police just tried to get things calmed down, they didn't try to solve the problem. For some years growing up we lived two blocks from a house with domestic violence issues, same address, very similar street names and to get there you had to turn onto our street.

Thus the cops often showed up at our door instead of the right one--often enough that the response to finding a cop at the door Friday night was "You want the house two blocks that way (pointing)" without the cop having a chance to say a word. That's messed up!

The same thing they said when they shot a naked, unarmed Anthony Hill (and other black men) who had even less a place to hide any weapon as this shooter kept on his underwear and Hill (and other black men in other incidents) were completely naked.

Naked means you have no place to hide a weapon. It doesn't mean you can't take a weapon from someone. When you see a case of the police shooting an unarmed person you should always consider the possibility it came from the person going after the cop's gun.

 

[Toni]

Yup, back then the police just tried to get things calmed down, they didn't try to solve the problem. For some years growing up we lived two blocks from a house with domestic violence issues, same address, very similar street names and to get there you had to turn onto our street.

Thus the cops often showed up at our door instead of the right one--often enough that the response to finding a cop at the door Friday night was "You want the house two blocks that way (pointing)" without the cop having a chance to say a word. That's messed up!

The same thing they said when they shot a naked, unarmed Anthony Hill (and other black men) who had even less a place to hide any weapon as this shooter kept on his underwear and Hill (and other black men in other incidents) were completely naked.

Naked means you have no place to hide a weapon. It doesn't mean you can't take a weapon from someone. When you see a case of the police shooting an unarmed person you should always consider the possibility it came from the person going after the cop's gun.

And yet two white men, both at least partially clothed had just committed mass murders and were taken into custody by police immediately after murder of people.

Naked black men who are unarmed are killed on sight.

What possibly could be the difference in the situations? White men, one of whom was still heavily armed who just committed mass murder are not seen as big a threat as a naked unarmed black man pleading for help.

It’s hard to admit that people are indeed treated differently because of how they look but they are. Sometimes with brutally tragic results.

It’s time for you to give it up, Loren. After all you came out in defense of police shooting an unarmed 12 year old black child playing in the park. Just stop and consider that police make snap judgements all the time and among those judgement are that even terrified naked black men are more of a threat than heavily armed white mass murderers. And you make those same snap judgements from the safety of your computer screen. Except they aren’t snap judgements.

 

[Gospel]

I bet top dollar those same cops were weed specialists during traffic stops.

Could be.

I think you get the joke Trausti. That's the only quality I find personally redeemable about you so far from reading your posts on this forum. What I mean is police get so extra inquisitive over the smallest bullshit during traffic stops. I was stopped for rolling down my window. Officer said, "that's what they usually do when they see us; try to empty the car out of weed smoke" (don't get it twisted it was a black cop). I was literally told that as an excuse for pulling me over on the way to work at 7:15 am in the god damn morning. So the joke here is (which I think you got) is the police are triggered by something less than a NAKED BLEEDING CHILD that was REPORTED MISSING after RECEIVING A PHONE CALL POINTING THEM IN THAT DIRECTION. So I don't agree with your take.

 

[Coleman Smith]

According to the Daily Beast, the shooter has extreme mental health issues. Paranoid schizophrenia.

What about people who sold him a gun? What mental disorder do they have?

He passed a background check.

That limits their liability.

 

[Swammerdami]

Has there ever been a case of a black man going on a murderous shooting rampage with an assault weapon being taken alive by police?
That's two white ones in a week.

Oops. Doesn't sound too white to me, actually:

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-colorado-boulder-shooting-press-conference-king-sooper-20210323-mcgbcoontrbxrovg6japxjwtce-story.html?utm_source=onesignal&utm_medium=notification&utm_campaign=2021-03-23-Boulder-shootin

Does this change the narrative for you?

Do TFT right-wingers get their memes from Facebook? This "satire" article, or rather its fake screen-grab which offers no clue it was "satire", is making the rounds among FB's right-wingers

When I clicked that link, I first got a pop-up:

Stay Ahead of the Censors
Big Tech is suppressing conservative voices. Sign up for our free newsletter so you'll keep getting our content, no matter what.

Your email: ___________
Sign Up _________________

^{Fake news you can trust, delivered straight to your inbox.}

I think the pop-up tells us whether the website is "humor" or political propaganda. "Suppressing conservatives voices" is in a large font. Even the grudging admission in the fine print that this is "fake news" is qualified: "fake news you can trust."

If photoshopping CNN screen-grabs to change the text is protected by the First Amendment then the First Amendment is an ass.

 

[Trausti]

Do TFT right-wingers get their memes from Facebook? This "satire" article, or rather its fake screen-grab which offers no clue it was "satire", is making the rounds among FB's right-wingers

When I clicked that link, I first got a pop-up:

Stay Ahead of the Censors
Big Tech is suppressing conservative voices. Sign up for our free newsletter so you'll keep getting our content, no matter what.

Your email: ___________
Sign Up _________________

^{Fake news you can trust, delivered straight to your inbox.}

I think the pop-up tells us whether the website is "humor" or political propaganda. "Suppressing conservatives voices" is in a large font. Even the grudging admission in the fine print that this is "fake news" is qualified: "fake news you can trust."

If photoshopping CNN screen-grabs to change the text is protected by the First Amendment then the First Amendment is an ass.

View attachment 32526

Sorry that satire is so hard for you.

 

[repoman]

A more interesting thing is the blood libel against whites by passing off a murder by two black teens as if it were committed by a white girl.

 

[Trausti]

A more interesting thing is the blood libel against whites by passing off a murder by two black teens as if it were committed by a white girl.

There's also the blood libel that a recent uptick in attacks on Asians is caused by wypipo when, ya know.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Naked means you have no place to hide a weapon. It doesn't mean you can't take a weapon from someone. When you see a case of the police shooting an unarmed person you should always consider the possibility it came from the person going after the cop's gun.

And yet two white men, both at least partially clothed had just committed mass murders and were taken into custody by police immediately after murder of people.

Naked black men who are unarmed are killed on sight.

What possibly could be the difference in the situations? White men, one of whom was still heavily armed who just committed mass murder are not seen as big a threat as a naked unarmed black man pleading for help.

It’s hard to admit that people are indeed treated differently because of how they look but they are. Sometimes with brutally tragic results.

It’s time for you to give it up, Loren. After all you came out in defense of police shooting an unarmed 12 year old black child playing in the park. Just stop and consider that police make snap judgements all the time and among those judgement are that even terrified naked black men are more of a threat than heavily armed white mass murderers. And you make those same snap judgements from the safety of your computer screen. Except they aren’t snap judgements.

You are utterly obsessed with race when it actually comes down to behavior.

 

[Trausti]

Naked means you have no place to hide a weapon. It doesn't mean you can't take a weapon from someone. When you see a case of the police shooting an unarmed person you should always consider the possibility it came from the person going after the cop's gun.

And yet two white men, both at least partially clothed had just committed mass murders and were taken into custody by police immediately after murder of people.

Naked black men who are unarmed are killed on sight.

What possibly could be the difference in the situations? White men, one of whom was still heavily armed who just committed mass murder are not seen as big a threat as a naked unarmed black man pleading for help.

It’s hard to admit that people are indeed treated differently because of how they look but they are. Sometimes with brutally tragic results.

It’s time for you to give it up, Loren. After all you came out in defense of police shooting an unarmed 12 year old black child playing in the park. Just stop and consider that police make snap judgements all the time and among those judgement are that even terrified naked black men are more of a threat than heavily armed white mass murderers. And you make those same snap judgements from the safety of your computer screen. Except they aren’t snap judgements.

You are utterly obsessed with race when it actually comes down to behavior.

It could be that the media chooses to report and hype some stories and ignore others to fit a racial narrative. Could be.

 

[Swammerdami]

A more interesting thing is the blood libel against whites by passing off a murder by two black teens as if it were committed by a white girl.

I didn't click your link. What's the story, and why is it "more interesting"?

 

[Derec]

And yet two white men, both at least partially clothed had just committed mass murders and were taken into custody by police immediately after murder of people.

Naked black men who are unarmed are killed on sight.

What possibly could be the difference in the situations?

Anthony Hill was not "killed on sight". He was killed after charging at the cop. Which is very dangerous because an assailant can overpower and disarm a police officer.

White men, one of whom was still heavily armed who just committed mass murder are not seen as big a threat as a naked unarmed black man pleading for help.

If you surrender, you generally do not get shot. If you charge/attack, you probably will. Hill did not "plead for help". Where did you get that?

It’s time for you to give it up, Loren. After all you came out in defense of police shooting an unarmed 12 year old black child playing in the park.

You mean armed with a realistic looking replica firearm of a similar kind used to commit armed robberies? Including in one case by a perp not much older than Rice.

Just stop and consider that police make snap judgements all the time and among those judgement are that even terrified naked black men are more of a threat than heavily armed white mass murderers. And you make those same snap judgements from the safety of your computer screen. Except they aren’t snap judgements.

These judgments police officers make have, by necessity, to be snap judgments as things can escalate quickly within mere seconds. Hesitating too long can lead to a perp taking your gun for example. It has happened before. This is one of the many examples. Some examples end much more tragically though.

When talking about police shootings later on, in the comfort of our homes, we have to be cognizant of that fact.

 

[Derec]

They're still sitting right where I left them Derec.

Evidently not.

[irrelevant crap from another thread]

Are you trying to distract from your racist BS in this thread?

Btw, I am still waiting on your explanation for Alissa is white but Tlaib and Sarsour are not.

 

[thebeave]

Do TFT right-wingers get their memes from Facebook? This "satire" article, or rather its fake screen-grab which offers no clue it was "satire", is making the rounds among FB's right-wingers

When I clicked that link, I first got a pop-up:

Stay Ahead of the Censors
Big Tech is suppressing conservative voices. Sign up for our free newsletter so you'll keep getting our content, no matter what.

Your email: ___________
Sign Up _________________

^{Fake news you can trust, delivered straight to your inbox.}

I think the pop-up tells us whether the website is "humor" or political propaganda. "Suppressing conservatives voices" is in a large font. Even the grudging admission in the fine print that this is "fake news" is qualified: "fake news you can trust."

If photoshopping CNN screen-grabs to change the text is protected by the First Amendment then the First Amendment is an ass.

View attachment 32526

Take it easy dude. I'm not a "right winger" or on Facebook, and that article from Babylon Bee was written after I wrote what I did. All I said was, "Doesn't sound too white to me, actually.", referring to the killer's name. If you notice, there is some ambiguity in my statement as to whether he is actually white or not. I think its clear though, that he turned out not to be the kind of white man that many people had in mind initially, and in fact, many backtracked on their narrative a bit when the facts came out. Like this young lady:

https://www.newsweek.com/meena-harris-tweet-blaming-white-men-boulder-shooting-got-6500-retweets-35k-likes-before-1578206

Meena Harris, the niece of Vice President Kamala Harris, received more than 6,000 retweets and 35,000 likes on a since-deleted tweet, blaming white men for the violent shooting in Boulder, Colorado, on Monday.

According to screenshots of the deleted tweet, as of 6:59 p.m. ET on Monday, Harris received 6,564 retweets, 35,700 likes and over 300 quote tweets.

"The Atlanta shooting was not even a week ago. Violent white men are the greatest terrorist threat to our country," Harris wrote in the tweet that has since been deleted.

The removal of her tweet comes shortly after the Boulder Police Department identified the suspect as Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, a 21-year-old Arvada, Colorado, resident. Quotes from the Prophet Muhammad were posted on a Facebook page that appeared to belong to Alissa.

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjYoNL4g5Vg[/YOUTUBE]

 

[thebeave]

A more interesting thing is the blood libel against whites by passing off a murder by two black teens as if it were committed by a white girl.

There's also the blood libel that a recent uptick in attacks on Asians is caused by wypipo when, ya know.

There have been a lot of random beatings and killing of Asians in the San Francisco Bay Area recently. Its particularly disgusting, as many of the victims have been elderly just minding their own business. Its rather amusing watching the local media do a total tap dance trying not to mention the race of the assailants in these stories. Just calling it a hate crime. Meanwhile, they'll do another story about some "white Karen" who yelled at a black kid to get off her lawn.

I was listening to our local talk radio station recently discuss the uptick in Asian hate crime incidents with an Asian guest who was advocating for the victims. The very woke, liberal radio host asked the guest what is the race of the assailants doing all this. That was followed by just about the longest, most awkward pause I've ever heard on live radio. The guest said, very politely, "We don't track that kind of information". The host then spent most of the rest of the time railing on about how all the anti-Asian hate is being pushed by the white supremecists.

 

[Toni]

Naked means you have no place to hide a weapon. It doesn't mean you can't take a weapon from someone. When you see a case of the police shooting an unarmed person you should always consider the possibility it came from the person going after the cop's gun.

And yet two white men, both at least partially clothed had just committed mass murders and were taken into custody by police immediately after murder of people.

Naked black men who are unarmed are killed on sight.

What possibly could be the difference in the situations? White men, one of whom was still heavily armed who just committed mass murder are not seen as big a threat as a naked unarmed black man pleading for help.

It’s hard to admit that people are indeed treated differently because of how they look but they are. Sometimes with brutally tragic results.

It’s time for you to give it up, Loren. After all you came out in defense of police shooting an unarmed 12 year old black child playing in the park. Just stop and consider that police make snap judgements all the time and among those judgement are that even terrified naked black men are more of a threat than heavily armed white mass murderers. And you make those same snap judgements from the safety of your computer screen. Except they aren’t snap judgements.

You are utterly obsessed with race when it actually comes down to behavior.

Nope. That ain't me, babe.

You're the one who justifies every police shooting of unarmed black people.