It's true. If you're a new voter this election, your recollection of "before Trump" and the associated polarization of media landscapes is hazy at best. They've grown up in a social media driven world designed at its core to confuse and divide, to make people all too skeptical or all too trusting of exactly the wrong things.
I suspect that many middle aged voters today are failing to grasp the ways in which mass communications and media consumption have changed, just as their parents and grandparents did.
Where I see an obvious and blatant scam, my father in law sees an email with the logo of his bank on it as an official document on company letterhead. If it was a scam, he reasons, they would not be allowed to use the bank's logo.
He grew up in a world where the use of such identifying markers demonstrating trustworthiness wasn't yet rendered valueless.
We too grew up in a world whose key indicators of trustworthiness were different from what they have become, and it is still becoming more difficult to spot disinformation, or even to trust that "information" still exists at all.
The majority of us are very bad at recognizing that the entire system has changed beyond recognition from that with which we grew up, and so are incapable of understanding the way the system looks to those who did grow up with it.
And of course, the young people of today will get older, and become befuddled by new paradigms in their turn.
Within any society, at any time since mass literacy allowed people to be aware of the "news", there is a tension between the failure of older people to grasp the ways in which new scams operate, and the failure of young people to have learned skepticism from bitter experience.
Young and old are skeptical of different things, and both are aghast at just how easily fooled the other is.