You could still have a social safety net but there's nothing to be gained from not spending your whole paycheck. Thus everyone will live paycheck to paycheck.
WHAT paycheck? It’s just as likely YOU paying you as anyone else. You better get useful and get bargaining.
Unless you arw doing something about ut, you’re froggin’ it.
We? You and who else?
So - EITHER Israel changed their processes to prevent a recurrence of a serious issue; OR this is evidence that you were right all along.
Which people? Are they people whose opinions we should care about? Are they anyone you or I know personally? Or are they as mythical as the "we" who saw that you guessed correctly?
Do you ever read your own posts, and think "could this also apply to me?"?
I find it interesting how many people point to Project 2025, done independently of any actual party (even though it's definitely closely associated), but are perfectly content to ignore the DSA's actual published party platform and just hand-wave it away.Dude (and I'm saying that deliberately) maybe do some as you would call "Yank research" and check up on Project 2025. Your thought experiment isn't as theoretical as you'd prefer.Thought experiments are 99% thought and 1% experiment.The point of a thought experiment is to actually think about what would happen.
God forbid you might ever indulge in a thought experiment.
I suppose it depends on whether you assume those english-by-citizenship surnames indicate cultural assimilation or not.
I'm skipping a whole bunch, admittedly. But I think you're making a very fundamental error in your thinking.
Pretty sure that the countries that have billionaires have a much lower portion of people on the edge of starvation than those that don't.
Why would you assume, and why would any sane person believe, that their surnames indicate anything at all about cultural assimilation?
Sure sure, because Welsh and English culture are just wildly different and have such little common ground...Why would you assume, and why would any sane person believe, that their surnames indicate anything at all about cultural assimilation?
Those Englishmen going by the name of "Jones" - why are they so poorly assimilated as to still use a Welsh surname? They could easily have changed their names, so the fact that they didn't clearly implies their support for Meibion Glyndŵr. They should all be closely watched in case they burn down any holiday cottages. Certainly we can't count them as really English.
On the contrary, life for C17th English peasants was longer and healther by far than the life of C19th factory workers.
Probably. But feudalism formally ended in 1645 in England, and was permanently abolished in 1660; Serfdom had already been abolished for 86 years by the time Charles II signed the Tenures Abolition Act - Elizabeth I officially ended serfdom by proclamation in 1574, but it had at that time been de facto nonexistent (for all bar a tiny number of royal bondsmen) for many decades - by the end of the reign of Richard II (died 1400CE), serfdom had largely been replaced by tenancy - farm workers paying rent on land, selling what they produced, and keeping any surplus over and above the rent as income.
The boyos in Meibion Glyndŵr certainly thought so.Sure sure, because Welsh and English culture are just wildly different and have such little common ground...Why would you assume, and why would any sane person believe, that their surnames indicate anything at all about cultural assimilation?
Those Englishmen going by the name of "Jones" - why are they so poorly assimilated as to still use a Welsh surname? They could easily have changed their names, so the fact that they didn't clearly implies their support for Meibion Glyndŵr. They should all be closely watched in case they burn down any holiday cottages. Certainly we can't count them as really English.
Of course it does. Who in this discussion has suggested otherwise?
No diplomatic recognition = no ability to check.
Total human population at zero. Humanity is in a very precarious position, we are so dependent on the interconnections. And when those interconnections fail you'll have cascade failures that take out most of humanity, and the most likely outcome for the survivors is fighting over what remains to below sustainable population. Post-apocalyptic fiction is common but it never answers where the next meal is coming from and why said meal wasn't already eaten by somebody else.
