PyramidHead
Contributor
AOC to endorse Bernie along with the rest of the squad! Never been so happy to be wrong in my life
LOL about that. I've seen some speculations that he has gotten hair transplants.Holy crap! I've never seen a man more vain about his hair than Trump. He's obviously bald and gray yet he colors his hair that ridiculous orange color and spent a great deal of time to grow that huge combover.
That was from last March. She responds: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hit back at transport criticismAOC is a hypocrite and I suspect her apologists here and elsewhere know it! That's not just my opinion either!
Over the weekend, the New York Post published a story about Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s extensive use of Uber and Lyft and her penchant for flying over taking the train. The article raised the question of whether the sponsor of the Green New Deal, which calls for “a full transition off fossil fuels and zero greenhouse gases” in the next decade as well as plans to “totally overhaul transportation by massively expanding electric vehicle manufacturing, build charging stations everywhere, build out high-speed rail,” is a hypocrite.
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-hypocrisy-problem/
That was from last March. She responds: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hit back at transport criticismAOC is a hypocrite and I suspect her apologists here and elsewhere know it! That's not just my opinion either!
Over the weekend, the New York Post published a story about Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s extensive use of Uber and Lyft and her penchant for flying over taking the train. The article raised the question of whether the sponsor of the Green New Deal, which calls for “a full transition off fossil fuels and zero greenhouse gases” in the next decade as well as plans to “totally overhaul transportation by massively expanding electric vehicle manufacturing, build charging stations everywhere, build out high-speed rail,” is a hypocrite.
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-hypocrisy-problem/
She has indeed ridden Amtrak, and on one occasion, she wrote that it less stressful than flying, even if more time-consuming.
Eva Perón became the subject of a musical, Evita, and Cristina Fernández de Kirchner considers her an inspiration. She was president of Argentina over 2007-2015, and she also is known by a three-letter acronym: CFK.She was born in poverty in the rural village of Los Toldos, in the Pampas, as the youngest of five children. At 15 in 1934, she moved to the nation's capital of Buenos Aires to pursue a career as a stage, radio, and film actress. She met Colonel Juan Perón there on 22 January 1944 during a charity event at the Luna Park Stadium to benefit the victims of an earthquake in San Juan, Argentina. The two were married the following year. Juan Perón was elected President of Argentina in 1946; during the next six years, Eva Perón became powerful within the pro-Peronist trade unions, primarily for speaking on behalf of labor rights. She also ran the Ministries of Labor and Health, founded and ran the charitable Eva Perón Foundation, championed women's suffrage in Argentina, and founded and ran the nation's first large-scale female political party, the Female Peronist Party.
In 1951, Eva Perón announced her candidacy for the Peronist nomination for the office of Vice President of Argentina, receiving great support from the Peronist political base, low-income and working-class Argentines who were referred to as descamisados or "shirtless ones". Opposition from the nation's military and bourgeoisie, coupled with her declining health, ultimately forced her to withdraw her candidacy.[4] In 1952, shortly before her death from cancer at 33, Eva Perón was given the title of "Spiritual Leader of the Nation" by the Argentine Congress.[5][6][7] She was given a state funeral upon her death, a prerogative generally reserved for heads of state.
After serving in several government positions, including Minister of Labor and Vice President, he was elected President of Argentina three times, serving from June 1946 to September 1955, when he was overthrown in a coup d'état, and then from October 1973 until his death in July 1974.
During his first presidential term (1946–52), Perón was supported by his second wife, Eva Duarte ("Evita"), and they were immensely popular among the Argentine working class. Eva died in 1952, and Perón was elected to a second term, serving from 1952 until 1955. During the following period of two military dictatorships, interrupted by two civilian governments, the Peronist party was outlawed and Perón was exiled. When the left-wing Peronist Héctor José Cámpora was elected President in 1973, Perón returned to Argentina and was soon after elected President for a third time. His third wife, María Estela Martínez, known as Isabel Perón, was elected as Vice President on his ticket and succeeded him as President upon his death in 1974.
Although they are still controversial figures, Juan and Eva Perón are nonetheless considered icons by the Peronists. The Peróns' followers praised their efforts to eliminate poverty and to dignify labour, while their detractors considered them demagogues and dictators
AOC to endorse Bernie along with the rest of the squad! Never been so happy to be wrong in my life
Wrong. That AOC talks a lot about income inequality is something that is not disputed. Johnny Talker's request was not a genuine one; he just wants to distract from the fact that he was wrong about "democratic socialism" being a type of socialism. He is refusing to admit his mistake, and so he is hiding behind these silly requests.In other words, you got nothin'.
AOC is a hypocrite and I suspect her apologists here and elsewhere know it! That's not just my opinion either!
Over the weekend, the New York Post published a story about Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s extensive use of Uber and Lyft and her penchant for flying over taking the train. The article raised the question of whether the sponsor of the Green New Deal, which calls for “a full transition off fossil fuels and zero greenhouse gases” in the next decade as well as plans to “totally overhaul transportation by massively expanding electric vehicle manufacturing, build charging stations everywhere, build out high-speed rail,” is a hypocrite.
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-hypocrisy-problem/
AOC is a hypocrite and I suspect her apologists here and elsewhere know it! That's not just my opinion either!
Over the weekend, the New York Post published a story about Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s extensive use of Uber and Lyft and her penchant for flying over taking the train. The article raised the question of whether the sponsor of the Green New Deal, which calls for “a full transition off fossil fuels and zero greenhouse gases” in the next decade as well as plans to “totally overhaul transportation by massively expanding electric vehicle manufacturing, build charging stations everywhere, build out high-speed rail,” is a hypocrite.
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-hypocrisy-problem/
Um...
Uber and Lyft have hybrid and electric car drivers for environmentally conscious customers.
Do you suddenly disbelieve in free market pressures just because AOC?
Okay, maybe you do. How about this? In order for drivers to maximize profitability they need to reduce gas price. So buying a used Prius has been recommended to drivers.
So did you also stop believing in capitalism?
Electric cars would make sense, too, but the infrastructure isn't there to make that practicable in many places...which is exactly what AOC is trying to change through legislation. That legislative advocacy also makes sense and is not a contradiction but a way to make the system better.
Maybe you don't believe in improvement.
AOC is a hypocrite and I suspect her apologists here and elsewhere know it! That's not just my opinion either!
Over the weekend, the New York Post published a story about Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s extensive use of Uber and Lyft and her penchant for flying over taking the train. The article raised the question of whether the sponsor of the Green New Deal, which calls for “a full transition off fossil fuels and zero greenhouse gases” in the next decade as well as plans to “totally overhaul transportation by massively expanding electric vehicle manufacturing, build charging stations everywhere, build out high-speed rail,” is a hypocrite.
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-hypocrisy-problem/
Um...
Uber and Lyft have hybrid and electric car drivers for environmentally conscious customers.
Do you suddenly disbelieve in free market pressures just because AOC?
Okay, maybe you do. How about this? In order for drivers to maximize profitability they need to reduce gas price. So buying a used Prius has been recommended to drivers.
So did you also stop believing in capitalism?
Electric cars would make sense, too, but the infrastructure isn't there to make that practicable in many places...which is exactly what AOC is trying to change through legislation. That legislative advocacy also makes sense and is not a contradiction but a way to make the system better.
Maybe you don't believe in improvement.
That improvement is not feesable or affordable until the science catches up with the crazy idea of carbon emission free world for perhaps centuries. Just about every single item in an average home is made or uses fossil fuel.
After her uphill struggle against Joe Crowley, AOC is clearly not wanting to take any chances. In fact, she may end up with an embarrassment of riches.It is hard to imagine a scenario where Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez loses her seat next year. She has raised more than $3.4 million, is better known than some presidential candidates and handily won a district that is among the bluest in the nation.
But that hasn’t stopped people — lots of them — from trying to unseat her.
So far, eight Republicans and three Democrats have filed to run for Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s seat in the Bronx and Queens. Two of the Republicans have each raised more than $420,000, even though no Republican has represented the Bronx in Congress in at least 50 years.
Attacking her for doing her job as a national politician?The challengers, from both parties, share largely the same criticisms of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. They slam her opposition to bringing an Amazon headquarters to New York City, blaming her for 25,000 lost jobs; they call her too radical to represent the district; and they accuse her of being too focused on building her national profile.
“Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez has done an excellent job establishing a national persona for herself,” Mr. Cummings said. “But most of the people who live in the district, even Democrats I’ve spoken to, feel that she’s just not concerned with what goes on here.”
They don't seem to be trying to present themselves as a better AOC than AOC. Instead, they recite right-wing talking points.At times, it can seem the candidates are running against Ms. Ocasio-Cortez more than they are running for any particular message.
That improvement is not feesable or affordable until the science catches up with the crazy idea of carbon emission free world for perhaps centuries. Just about every single item in an average home is made or uses fossil fuel.
You are changing the subject from alleged hypocrisy of AOC to alleged infeasibility of Green New Deal. In discussion about alleged hypocrisy, the claim is that condition A contradicts condition B. But AOC has introduced legislation to move from condition A to condition B by adding enablement of condition B which currently is very lacking. So, condition A does not contradict condition B. If you want to now discuss infeasibility of Green New Deal, at least concede you were wrong about the hypocrisy as I have laid out, first, before changing the subject.
That improvement is not feesable or affordable until the science catches up with the crazy idea of carbon emission free world for perhaps centuries. Just about every single item in an average home is made or uses fossil fuel.
You are changing the subject from alleged hypocrisy of AOC to alleged infeasibility of Green New Deal. In discussion about alleged hypocrisy, the claim is that condition A contradicts condition B. But AOC has introduced legislation to move from condition A to condition B by adding enablement of condition B which currently is very lacking. So, condition A does not contradict condition B. If you want to now discuss infeasibility of Green New Deal, at least concede you were wrong about the hypocrisy as I have laid out, first, before changing the subject.
Blind Freddy can see the blatant hypocrisy of AOC, or anyone else who mentions the green new deal while having a well above average carbon footprint as she and her cronies have.
Blind Freddy can see the blatant hypocrisy of AOC, or anyone else who mentions the green new deal while having a well above average carbon footprint as she and her cronies have.
So after being refuted, you just repeat the claim. That's political, not logical.
Bullshit. It is already feasible. angelo, have you ever heard of the Fischer-Tropsch reaction? One can use as feedstocks H2 from electrolysis of water and CO2 from the air.That improvement is not feesable or affordable until the science catches up with the crazy idea of carbon emission free world for perhaps centuries. Just about every single item in an average home is made or uses fossil fuel.... Electric cars would make sense, too, but the infrastructure isn't there to make that practicable in many places...which is exactly what AOC is trying to change through legislation. That legislative advocacy also makes sense and is not a contradiction but a way to make the system better.
Maybe you don't believe in improvement.