angelo
Deleted
One can't argue with a deluded cult follower without pulling out what little hair iv'e got left!
It also helped AOC that she lives in New York City, as opposed to St. Louis, Las Vegas, or rural West Virginia.That’s why other House superstars like Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib, and Ayanna Pressley were not considered — they’d all held office before. And while Ocasio-Cortez was the easiest candidate Lears connected with, the rest of the four women profiled in the film were ideal because of their “very strong personal stories of overcoming hardship and loss and pain, and even trauma, to find strength and turn that into a drive for positive action,” a theme that drew her to each of them. Geography and timing played a role as well.
“We wanted to really make this a national story, so the fact that they were from different regions and from different backgrounds and that together they could represent something that was more than the sum of the parts was also a huge factor,” she said. “And their primaries had to be on different dates because we did not have the budget to have multiple crews going around.”
Sen. McConnell is likely to obstruct it, and even if he doesn't, then the Senate is unlikely to pass it. Even if it does, then Trump is unlikely to sign it. Yet another addition to the big pile of bills that the Senator has obstructed.Against the wishes of progressive members, Democratic leadership was moving forward with a bill that would subject at least 25 drugs to price negotiation, with that number growing to 30 drugs in five years and 35 in 10 years. But in a rare show of force, the Progressive Caucus delicately made it clear to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that they would block the bill from getting to the floor by voting down the rule ― unless Pelosi made changes.
The speaker had no choice but to play ball.
Pelosi agreed to increase the number of drugs up for negotiation to at least 50, and she restored a provision that would eventually restrict the ability of pharmaceutical companies to raise the price of a drug above the rate of inflation.
But if there was one member who seemed most open to the idea, it was Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).
“I think we should exercise power,” Ocasio-Cortez told HuffPost in September. “And I think we leave it on the table. I think that we don’t always play things out at our maximum power.”
Ocasio-Cortez was careful to note many of the differences between the Freedom Caucus and a potential counterbalancing group on the left. But she was enthusiastic about the idea of having “a critical mass of that 20 to 25” progressives that could “throw that weight around and exercise power on behalf of working people.”
“Like, hell yeah,” Ocasio-Cortez continued, “I think that should be done.”
Even this week, Ocasio-Cortez told HuffPost she’s been arguing that the Progressive Caucus should be smaller and have more committed members. “I don’t think that we just allow anyone to just walk through the door and be able to call themselves a progressive when their voting record doesn’t do it, when they don’t go to the mat on the issues,” she said.
“There’s a lot that we’re leaving on the table,” Ocasio-Cortez said of the CPC. “And it’s certainly disappointing.”
Something like the "Lifetime Achievement" sorts of awards that Michael Jackson would often get at awards shows. He apparently would only show up if he won something.When Republicans started the Freedom Caucus, the roughly two dozen conservatives who first joined had all largely been ostracized from leadership. They were thrown onto the worst committees, they were constantly at war with then-Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), and they were nowhere near the real power of the Republican Party. For Democrats, it’s a different story.
While Pelosi may make the final decision on just about everything, progressives at least have a seat at the table. Republican leadership staffers love to mock Democrats for having positions like “chair of the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee,” “assistant speaker,” or “co-chairman for the Democratic Steering Committee,” but those seemingly meaningless positions actually have placated a lot of members.
So they are in a bind -- how to exert power without being nihilists and obstructionists.“Progressives have an aspiration beyond policy,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told HuffPost in July. “We hope to see the reconciliation of the country along the vision of a pluralistic America.”
...
Pocan also recognizes that proactively trying to pass legislation is different from blocking it. “If you just want to defeat things, those are good tactics,” Pocan said of the Freedom Caucus this week. “If you want to enact things, they’re not the same tactics.”
Someone ought to put them into a scrapbook.The corridors of Capitol Hill are a marbled monotony, with Oxford heels clacking around corners indistinguishable from one another, white walls, oaken doors, and a steady rhythm of rectangular congressional nameplates.
Except for one. At the very end of a hallway in Cannon Office Building is an explosion of affirmation cribbed onto thousands of Post-it notes, a neon-green-and-pastel-pink flower bursting outward. Go there at the right time, Hill aides say, and you can see groups of people, usually women, often young, weeping at the sight of it.
“I love you from Maine! Keep on with your fierce, informed queen of a self!,” wrote Mikala from Bangor on a pink Post-it. “AOC! Seeing you is seeing me! I live in Michigan, but you are my representative. Adelante!,” says one on white signed (with a heart) from Kristen on August 1. “Dear AOC. Continue to scare old white men,” adds another.
...
Staff took the first batch and framed them in her office, but the notes kept coming. If anyone writes something negative or nasty, one of the myriad devotees who make the pilgrimage takes the errant note down before it can spoil the mood.
“It’s weird,” Ocasio-Cortez said when we spoke inside the Capitol Building one afternoon in mid-December as impeachment hearings consumed Washington. “Because I know I am also one of the most hated people in America.”
A tea party of the left? An Herbal Tea Party?“People come here, and they have served in state legislatures or they may have been executives for health-insurance or fossil-fuel companies or lobbyist groups or PACs, and they’re part of this whole club,” she said. She was dressed in all black — blazer, blouse, pants, and boots, looking more like someone about to cruise out of the last shot of a movie on a motorcycle than someone skipping out on a House Financial Services Committee meeting. “What is it like to show up to Congress with a beginner’s mind? You just fundamentally do things differently.”
The Democratic congressional majority, she told me, is too acquiescent to the demands of its members in so-called red-to-blue districts — those moderates who flipped Republican seats and gave Pelosi the gavel. “For so long, when I first got in, people were like, ‘Oh, are you going to basically be a tea party of the left?’ And what people don’t realize is that there is a tea party of the left, but it’s on the right edges, the most conservative parts of the Democratic Party. So the Democratic Party has a role to play in this problem, and it’s like we’re not allowed to talk about it. We’re not allowed to talk about anything wrong the Democratic Party does,” she said. “I think I have created more room for dissent, and we’re learning to stretch our wings a little bit on the left.”
That's because of Duverger's law forcing convergence onto two parties, meaning that the parties become awkward coalitions.“Oh God,” she said with a groan. “In any other country, Joe Biden and I would not be in the same party, but in America, we are.”
She had portrayed her opponent Joe Crowley as hopelessly compromised by big money. Would she do the same to her colleagues?“I realized this was going to be a tattoo-on-my-face kind of situation,” she said. “I can’t go outside anymore. I miss being able to go out to dinner. I miss anonymity. I have to send my boyfriend out to get groceries. There has been a shift in chores.”
If she was a hero on the streets of New York and online, in Congress, “it was very, very chilly coming in,” she said.
Though it was a daring move for her, her Congressional career survived. She wasn't shoved into the least-wanted committees. In fact, she got into some nice committees for her: the Oversight and Financial Services committee.“I was terrified,” she told me. She doesn’t regret it — though it set the stage for a very complicated year with Pelosi. “I learned a lot about how fear shapes the decisions of elected officials: ‘I know this could be bad, and this could make someone mad, and I don’t know exactly how they would drop the hammer on me or what hammers would be dropped.’ It felt like the right thing to do, and when you say that people think it’s a form of naïveté and that it’s childish, but I don’t think it was.”
A lot of House and NYC-gov't colleagues credit her for doing her job, showing up at meetings, asking detailed questions, taking notes, and doing e-mail followups. She has created 15 bills and resolutions, like the Green new Deal, and she has missed only 2 out of 701 roll-call votes. She's far from Joe-Crowley absenteeism, and her small-dollar fundraising helps her do her work without having to dial for dollars. A House aide said about her "I think people are surprised at how not-strident she comes off."“What was frustrating was getting singled out over and over again over a series of interviews by the Democratic leadership,” Ocasio-Cortez told me. She said that her colleagues consider her an unseen force in every primary this cycle, when in fact she has made endorsements in just two races. Meanwhile, it is the moderates who have put up more challengers to liberal incumbents than the other way around. “As a consequence of my victory, many people are inspired to run for office, and in a body where 70 percent of the seats are safe red or safe blue, that de facto means a lot more primaries. A lot of members think I’m like a Koch brother.”
Hopelessly wimpy, and not on the scale of what needs to be done.“The most ambitious climate plans were a carbon tax here or a biodiesel thing there. There were no climate bills that were a solution on the scale of the problem. I couldn’t take all of this and say, ‘Let’s get a 10 percent subsidy on electric vehicles,’ ” Ocasio-Cortez said. “These very small incremental plans are a form of denialism.”
Ralph Nader - all I can say is "Ugh!" He did some good work in the 1960's on auto safety, but his 2000 campaign was awful. Bernie Sanders has tried to be more approachable recently, by describing his immigrant family heritage as a descendant of Eastern European Jews.Outspoken lefties have come and gone before, but often they were like Bernie or, before him, Ralph Nader: rumpled, grouchy, hectoring. For leftists, politics used to be something to avoid, a corrupting drag on the purity of activism. Ocasio-Cortez has changed that.
“You hear that trope all the time. ‘I am a workhorse; I am not a show horse.’ But what I think people don’t understand is that educating the public is a part of this job. The most effective public servants are part of our culture. They are just as fluidly part of the conversation as Lizzo or as this movie that you saw,” she said.
This is part of her project, too. If people are paying attention, she figures, they will be on her side. “Politics should be pop because it should be consumable and accessible to everyday people,” she said. “I think that’s what populism is about.”
That isn't the whole story, of course. Vermont has had some demographic and sociological changes that are bigger than any one politician's effort. One of them is likely what BS himself is an example of: New Yorkers moving into that state.“Everyone in the House is just constantly thinking about self-preservation, and we don’t get nice things because people are constantly thinking in electoral terms. The way we change that is through political education. I had this conversation with Bernie,” she said. “Here’s this guy in a then-Republican state, a quite conservative state, and he wins by a handful of votes to become mayor of Burlington. And by the time he becomes senator, Vermont is crazy-blue. And a lot of that has to do with his time there. And I said, ‘So how’d you do this?’ And he said that he and different grassroots movements in Vermont spent decades doing political education. And they took on the long-term project of turning a red state blue.”
I recall her writing when Trump was elected that he is more a symptom than the disease. She's right about that, I think, and that's from the sort of supporters that he has.“Republicans have focused on that long-term project for a very long period of time. Democrats don’t. We think if something is red, it stays red. But you know what? I think if a state like Tennessee or West Virginia can go from blue to red in our lifetime, I think it can go back,” she told me. Justice Democrats are taking aim at another dozen or so incumbents this cycle; if a few more get in, she could build a bloc. “That’s a kind of project that a lot of people think is a waste of time, but I don’t think it is,” she said.
“This whole primary,” she went on, referring to the one Biden and Bernie are in, “is going to be about the soul of the Democratic Party. I think it’s a referendum on whether we think everything was fine before Trump. People who live in a lot of privilege, who think of public programs as charity, they often think there was nothing wrong before Trump. They think Hillary was the problem. But it’s much deeper than that.”
Civil-rights activist Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote a book that he titled "Why We Can't Wait". He didn't like all those people who objected that he was pushing for too much too fast.jacksonheightsnystrong:
As a constituent, I can attest to the fact that she's very present in the community, and that her offices ALWAYS answer the phone with a live person. I have called many Republicans in Congress who influence national policy; the vast majority of them have not answered the phone, and some don't even have a working voice mail. And I absolutely love watching her decimate Trump's allies in hearings. Refreshing to have a representative who actually does the real work!
wendylukasletters:
Love you girl. Keep going. signed a 58 year old cisgender white woman with three kids, two grand kids, a loving husband and deceased parents who would have voted for you if given the chance.
thisworks3:
This is the same BS that racists told blacks back in the civil rights era. Just wait a bit, slow down, just take it slow, you're going too fast. The Dems ran a centrist with Hilary Clinton and even though she won the popular vote, many people weren't motivated by her at all. People voted for Barack Obama because they believed he would bring change in a large way. That didn't happen of course because at the end of the day he was a centrist as well, but the point is people believed change would happen. People aren't motivated by the status quo. In fact that's exactly why Trump got elected in the first place. People on he right felt he would bring a great deal of change quickly. I mean he did in a terrible way, but still, he was able to motivate people because both the left and the right are over this take it slow nonsense.
Crowley wasn't some Republican. But he wasn't that great a Democrat, it seems, and AOC was right to slam him on that. He also didn't seem to be doing much in "leading the fight against Trump", something that he claimed in his campaign literature. AOC didn't just talk about hope and change. She listed several specific proposals in her campaign literature.dslimon:
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez speaks for me. I support socialism, because it works in Finland and Norway, and those countries are just like America. She's a very wise Latina. Why compromise with people that disagree with you? When the election is over and you win, you just order them to shut up and impliment your agenda. It's for their own good.
jacksonheightsnystrong:
I actually live in AOC's district. I am a big fan of hers but not of Bernie (because of his negligence/passivity in disavowing the Russian assistance to his campaign, even after he had lost the nomination, among other things). A few points here:
1. Most people in this district pull the D lever because we recognize that there is no upside to voting Republican in any circumstance, or growing the Republican caucus in the House.
2. I thought Crowley was fine, but I attended several of his town halls and asked him point-blank about Trump's trampling of political norms, the rule of law, and basic decency. His response was pretty milquetoast and not sufficiently followed up in the public sphere. So I voted against him in 2018.
3. A Congressional Representative is not the same as a presidential candidate. The whole point of a Representative is that they represent the general perspective and interests of your district in the Congressional body. AOC does this. Nobody seems to have a problem when extremely conservative districts elect extremely conservative representatives.
4. If you want to talk about whether she's an ideal candidate for President in a national election, that's a totally different discussion, not relevant until at least the year 2023, and not something she herself brought up. It makes no sense to conflate the two.
"Auditions" - AOC as an actress?wait500:
I live in her district. She won for one reason. That group that she applied to where they had auditions for people to run for office were very smart and very targeted. They knew that they could get out the gentrification vote in her district for the win and they did! They took advantage of a lazy blue electorate that didn't inform itself on who was running and they went after the newer residents who came from educated/indoctrinated backgrounds (ivy league schools filled with communist and socialist yearnings) and this group of gentrifiers went all out for her and got her elected. Being latina was enough for many of the lazies to vote for her. She didn't live in the district, she knows no one here, she has zero roots, she had zero long term relationships with any local pols - it was simply a smart group that used her and targeted this area. That's not to take away from her ability to hold the camera's gaze (while spouting the stupidest inanities). She will only improve in her ability to actually make coherent messages because "you go girl" will only last so long (as she ages). But the NYC establishment resentment against her is coming so one can only hope that they get some good shots in at this absolutely idiotic and dangerous lunatic.
GND is a pie in the sky. Completely unworkable, even if an actual GND bill could pass Congress. Note that the actual resolution is vague as hell - what meat there is to GND at this point is found in AOC's GND FAQ. Yes, that's the one where she bemoans that she can't get rid of all airplanes and "farting cows" within 10 years.A lot of House and NYC-gov't colleagues credit her for doing her job, showing up at meetings, asking detailed questions, taking notes, and doing e-mail followups. She has created 15 bills and resolutions, like the Green new Deal,
Oh, she is definitely a show filly.“You hear that trope all the time. ‘I am a workhorse; I am not a show horse.’
But what I think people don’t understand is that educating the public is a part of this job. The most effective public servants are part of our culture. They are just as fluidly part of the conversation as Lizzo or as this movie that you saw,” she said.
Real world issues are far more complex than her "politics as pop". That way you get nonsense like GND.This is part of her project, too. If people are paying attention, she figures, they will be on her side. “Politics should be pop because it should be consumable and accessible to everyday people,” she said. “I think that’s what populism is about.”
So it's not socialism when those countries do it, but it is socialism when the US does it, right?Sigh.H. Eric Loewe on Twitter: "@TheTNHoller @AOC MT @_waleedshahid @AOC asked at #SXSW why Democrats don’t defend Scandinavian-style socialism and social democracy:
Scandinavian countries do not have socialism.
Not allowed in a social sense, as opposed to a legal sense.Has the 1st Amendment been repealed and I slept through it?There’s a lot of people that don’t want us to have a social democracy and they are in government and .... I'm not allowed to say that.
She likely has to breathe pure oxygen from a tank, because of having breathing difficulties making it difficult to get enough O2 from the air (20%).As obligate aerobes, so do all of us.My abuela relies on oxygen,
It's socialism when there is public control of the means of production.So it's not socialism when those countries do it, but it is socialism when the US does it, right?
Who is stopping her?Not allowed in a social sense, as opposed to a legal sense.
No shit Sherlock.She likely has to breathe pure oxygen from a tank, because of having breathing difficulties making it difficult to get enough O2 from the air (20%).