• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

And now the totally expected Trans Bathroom laws result

Sometimes I wonder whether even conservatives themselves would really want to live in the hellscape they consider an ideal society, if they had the opportunity to actually try it. {snip}

I know I don't want to live in the dystopian, zombie apocalypse hellscape that exists in some parts of Los Angeles, San Fransisco and other major SoCal cities that Newsom and his ilk have created.
So move up north. Give Trinity County a try. If you have no other useful skills, I'm sure they can teach you to operate some of the equipment. For a portion of your first few month's pay, of course. You'll have such a nice life up there in Republican-land, where there are no crimes or drugs or illnesses.

And you won't have to be afraid of meeting a trans person at the gym ever again (they don't have any gyms, that's what the mills are for) nor be likely to be prosecuted for any crimes you might feel inclined to commit if you should meet a trans person at the general store, as long as you manage to talk to the sheriff before charges are filed. Paradise, I guess?
 
Of course, I don't know that anything like that happened. I'm pointing out that there's probably more to this than meets the eye. And I don't trust the sources to be accurate and complete.
Tom
...unless, of course, it confirms your bias... then the article is fair and balanced and totally accurate and complete.

Yeah.
I call that confirmation bias


But when it matches the faith of the Woke then it's

called something else.


Oh well.
Tom
 
Sometimes I wonder whether even conservatives themselves would really want to live in the hellscape they consider an ideal society, if they had the opportunity to actually try it. {snip}

I know I don't want to live in the dystopian, zombie apocalypse hellscape that exists in some parts of Los Angeles, San Fransisco and other major SoCal cities that Newsom and his ilk have created.
So move up north. Give Trinity County a try. If you have no other useful skills, I'm sure they can teach you to operate some of the equipment. For a portion of your first few month's pay, of course. You'll have such a nice life up there in Republican-land, where there are no crimes or drugs or illnesses.

And in the meantime the misery not only continues for the "homeless" but grows worse. And you are fine with that it seems. I'm fine where I am actually.

And you won't have to be afraid of meeting a trans person at the gym ever again (they don't have any gyms, that's what the mills are for) nor be prosecuted for any crimes you might feel inclined to commit if you should meet a trans person at the general store.

Is this one of your fantasies, to meet a trans person in the gym for some weird sexual adventure or is it just gibberish?
 
That is called confirmation bias. It is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.
No it isn't. It's stating the obvious.

Nobody on this forum really knows much about what happened. Important details will commonly get left out if the person reporting has an agenda.
Tom

Bruh. Tswizzle highlighted these two lines. “Noah did then get out of hand” & “screaming, yelling” as if the article was only about the arrest. If you read the article, you’d see that it is more than just about some transgender person getting arrested, it’s about someone following the law leading up to getting attacked which then leads to the police being called and the police arresting the victim because the victim was upset that they (the police) weren’t listing.

So the "more to the story" Tswizzle is implying could be

A) The alleged victim must have said something that warranted getting attacked since the alleged victim was drunk and seemingly didn't comply with the police.

B) The alleged victim was arrested for being belligerent towards the police

or

c) All of the above


Which looks like confirmation bias to me.

Side note: Being belligerent does not make it legal for someone to assault you in the USA. In fact, it is illegal for anyone to assault another person, regardless of whether or not the victim was being belligerent.
 
Sometimes I wonder whether even conservatives themselves would really want to live in the hellscape they consider an ideal society, if they had the opportunity to actually try it. {snip}

I know I don't want to live in the dystopian, zombie apocalypse hellscape that exists in some parts of Los Angeles, San Fransisco and other major SoCal cities that Newsom and his ilk have created.
It is within your power to achieve such a thing. Just follow these 3 easy steps.
1) Stop reading the Daily Mail.
2) That's it.
3) No, seriously. That's it.
 
Tswizzle highlighted these two lines.

What possible reason would you have for believing that TSwizzle's opinion is what I'm talking about?

I don't care what he thinks
Bruh

I don't think anyone on this forum knows enough about what happened in an Ohio campground to have an important opinion. Without y'alls confirmation bias, y'all don't have much.


Some dumbass caused trouble, then blamed it on transphobia.

Guess what? Not all trans folks are nice people. Plenty of them are self-centered pervey brats who will mess with other people and blame their resulting mess on transphobia.
Tom
 
Tswizzle highlighted these two lines.

What possible reason would you have for believing that TSwizzle's opinion is what I'm talking about?

I don't care what he thinks
Bruh

I don't think anyone on this forum knows enough about what happened in an Ohio campground to have an important opinion. Without y'alls confirmation bias, y'all don't have much.


Some dumbass caused trouble, then blamed it on transphobia.

Guess what? Not all trans folks are nice people. Plenty of them are self-centered pervey brats who will mess with other people and blame their resulting mess on transphobia.
Tom
No one here knows enough to have an important opinion, yet you feel the need to share your opinion to hint the victim probably deserved his beating. As if anyone merits a beating.
 
Is this one of your fantasies, to meet a trans person in the gym for some weird sexual adventure or is it just gibberish?
A perfect example of projection masquerading as analysis.
Just like your post right before this.
Oh well.
Tom
Wrong again.

Explain again how lacking perfect information on this incident means the victim merited a beating, and how everyone’s opinions but yours is unimportant.
 
Is this one of your fantasies, to meet a trans person in the gym for some weird sexual adventure or is it just gibberish?
A perfect example of projection masquerading as analysis.
Just like your post right before this.
Oh well.
Tom
Wrong again.

Explain again how lacking perfect information on this incident means the victim merited a beating, and how everyone’s opinions but yours is unimportant.

Since I didn't say any of that, the question becomes "why would I bother with your mischaracterization?".
The answer is "Oh well. Lovely weather we're having.".
Tom
 
Is this one of your fantasies, to meet a trans person in the gym for some weird sexual adventure or is it just gibberish?
A perfect example of projection masquerading as analysis.
Just like your post right before this.
Oh well.
Tom
Wrong again.

Explain again how lacking perfect information on this incident means the victim merited a beating, and how everyone’s opinions but yours is unimportant.

Since I didn't say any of that, the question becomes "why would I bother with your mischaracterization?".
The answer is "Oh well. Lovely weather we're having.".
Tom
True, you did not use those exact words. But why bring up the lack of information and that some transsexuals are self-serving pervs in a discussion about a transsexual being beaten for using the “ wrong” bathroom?

Really, educate me instead of responding with inanities.
 
True, you did not use those exact words.

Can we start here?
I didn't say any of that.

You mischaracterized what I did post.

Do you want to discuss what I say and believe? Or do you prefer to discuss your interpretation of my posts?
Tom
 
True, you did not use those exact words.

Can we start here?
I didn't say any of that.

You mischaracterized what I did post.

Do you want to discuss what I say and believe? Or do you prefer to discuss your interpretation of my posts?
Tom
You keep claiming I mischaracterised what you post without any explanation. Even after being explicitly asked questions and invited to explain what you meant to convey in your posts.

So either you will endeavour to explicate your meaning or you won’t.
 
What possible reason would you have for believing that TSwizzle's opinion is what I'm talking about?

The part where you posted an argument in defense of TSwizzle's post? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Saw this coming from the very start of this BS.

In Ohio, a Trans-man was camping. He went to the public bathroom, and used the women's room since he had been advised to use the bathroom of their birth gender. The result? 3 guys beat him up for using the women's room.

One thing that bothers me is when we get reports like this... from stories that are nearly a year old. I'm usually better at catching the old news thing. This story goes into a black hole and I can't find anything on it. I can't even find records on Ruiz in the Premble County court system, possibly indicating charges dropped. No subsequent article exists indicating charges of particular assaulters, only that the decision was handed up to the Preble County Sheriff’s Office. I did find one article indicating he'd been going or at that campground since before he was 12, he transitioned at 12.
 
You keep claiming I mischaracterised what you post

you did not use those exact words.

Any other questions?
Tom
Yes, why the quote mining instead of answering the questions clipped out or actually explaining your view.

Repetition of what you did nit mean is not an explanation of your meaning.
Totally brilliant dude.
Tom
Apparently I it’s brilliance dazzled you so much that you once again failed to respond to the content and answer the question. It is clear you confuse actual discussion with whining and vapid remarks.
 
Back
Top Bottom