No, I haven’t looked up the data, but from what we see, it’s a good bet we would make an impact. It’s right in our faces.
Sorry, but without data, you cannot really say that. And I disagree that it's right in our faces. All the data I have seen shows that vast majority of homicides are committed with weapons other than rifles (and so-called "assault weapons" are a subset of all rifles). All the data I have seen also shows that the 90s/Naughts "assault weapon" ban was not effective.
And sometimes it means everything. It’s how you prioritize. Does the deaths of school children bother you? Then this topic is to discuss it.
The problem with slicing the data fine is one of multiple comparisons. Let's say you have a data set. You slice you so you get 20 comparisons. That means that even without any real effect, you are likely to get p<0.05 (i.e. 1/20) by pure chance. Reminiscent of
this xkcd. This phenomenon becomes even worse when you desperately want to find a particular result.
And AR rifles seem to be a unique threat to these kids.
That is a statement born out of feelings, not facts. You admitted you do not have any particular data showing that.
The gun fetishist’s tactic is to always slice and dice in a way to divert attention. Like, “a discussion of dead first graders? May I bring your attention to drug killings in Black communities?” No, you may not.
I am neither a "gun fetishist" nor do I slice and dice.
And if we want to reduce gun violence, we should start where gun violence is most prevalent.
And we can start by enforcing existing laws, not introduce new draconian ones that would mostly impact lawful and peaceful gun owners.
Like not releasing gun offenders early. Example Houston:
The Texan said:
“We’re averaging anywhere from 30 to 40 cases a month in Harris County of defendants being released on a PR bond,” said [Andy] Kahan [of
Crime Stoppers of Houston]. “These are felons in possession of a firearm, a gun.”
Kahan cited the case of
Quinnton Allen, a felon convicted of armed robbery with a deadly weapon but paroled in December 2021. Within weeks, Allen was re-arrested and charged with FPW, but Judge Jason Luong approved his release on PR bond.
On June 18, 2022, police say Allen shot and killed 29-year-old Luis Espinoza. Allen is now back in custody and awaiting trial for murder.
Harris County Releasing Felons Possessing Firearms on Personal Recognizance ‘30 to 40 Times a Month’
We are talking about dead first graders and what are the most likely gun issues for them and how to solve it.
And banning a certain class of firearms outright is not a way to solve it.
Oh, and by the way, Black comunities have beeing trying to mitigate gun violence for a long time and are facing barriers from gun fetishists,
Many in the black communities have, which is why there was large support for the 90s crime bill in those communities.
But these days, they face backlash from #BLM types who fetishize criminals. Like calling
armed robber Daunte Wright the
"Prince of Brooklyn Center". GTFO with that BS!
so when we start a thread for that issue, you can learn all the things they’ve been trying to do for decades. But that is not the topic of school killings, which is the topic of this thread.
School killings are not that separate an issue from the overall problem of gun violence. They are all part of a whole.
Take the case of 17 year old
Austin Lyle, who shot two school employees a few days ago. He was on probation for a gun charge, which was downgraded from a felony. Had the law been adequately enforced, he would not have been allowed to attend school in person to begin with. That's my point again: enforce existing laws before coming up with new ones, esp. ones that ban whole categories of weapons for lawful gun owners.
So take your whataboutism, turn it to positive energy and start a thread on how to reduce violence from [whatever hobby horse - “don’t the rest of us count”]
It's not whataboutism to discuss ways that can actually help.
In a thread about school shootings, I would submit that if you are not a student, a school employee or a parent of school age children, then perhaps not, eh? Although if you are like many of us, you may care about violence to young children even if they are not you or yours.
I care about violence against children. And I am not opposed to sensible legislation either. I am opposed to legislation that is not going to accomplish much but restricts freedoms of lawful gun owners unduly.
And again, no legislation in the world is going to do anything if it is not enforced. What use are felony laws against ghost guns, for example, if the offender is not charged with a felony but is sent back to school instead? What use are laws against "felons in possession of a firearm" when offenders are released on own recognizance until they actually kill someone?
just as this thread focuses on the unique and targeted dangers to school children.
You have not established that AR15s are "unique and targeted danger" for children and teens in schools.